Padmavati Sahare1, Marcela Ayala2, Rafael Vazquez-Duhalt3, Vivechana Agrawal1. 1. Centro de Investigacion en Ingenieria y Ciencias Aplicadas, UAEM, Av. Universidad 1001, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62209, México. 2. Instituto de Biotecnología Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Av. Universidad 2001, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62250, México. 3. Centro de Nanociencias y Nanotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Km 107 Carretera Tijuana-Ensenada, Apdo Postal 14, CP. 22800 Ensenada, B.C., México.
Abstract
In this work, a commercial peroxidase was immobilized onto porous silicon (PS) support functionalized with 3-aminopropyldiethoxysilane (APDES) and the performance of the obtained catalytic microreactor was studied. The immobilization steps were monitored and the activity of the immobilized enzyme in the PS pores was spectrophotometrically determined. The enzyme immobilization in porous silicon has demonstrated its potential as highly efficient enzymatic reactor. The effect of a polar organic solvent (acetonitrile) and the temperature (up to 50°C) on the activity and stability of the biocatalytic microreactor were studied. After 2-h incubation in organic solvent, the microreactor retained 80% of its initial activity in contrast to the system with free soluble peroxidase that lost 95% of its activity in the same period of time. Peroxidase immobilized into the spaces of the porous silicon support would be perspective for applications in treatments for environmental security such as removal of leached dye in textile industry or in treatment of different industrial effluents. The system can be also applied in the field of biomedicine.
In this work, a commercial peroxidase was immobilized onto porous silicon (PS) support functionalized with 3-aminopropyldiethoxysilane (APDES) and the performance of the obtained catalytic microreactor was studied. The immobilization steps were monitored and the activity of the immobilized enzyme in the PS pores was spectrophotometrically determined. The enzyme immobilization in porous silicon has demonstrated its potential as highly efficient enzymatic reactor. The effect of a polar organic solvent (acetonitrile) and the temperature (up to 50°C) on the activity and stability of the biocatalytic microreactor were studied. After 2-h incubation in organic solvent, the microreactor retained 80% of its initial activity in contrast to the system with free soluble peroxidase that lost 95% of its activity in the same period of time. Peroxidase immobilized into the spaces of the porous silicon support would be perspective for applications in treatments for environmental security such as removal of leached dye in textile industry or in treatment of different industrial effluents. The system can be also applied in the field of biomedicine.
Among microelectronic materials, silicon (Si) has the most mature and low-cost
technology; hence, several research groups are approaching Si-compatible technology
as an innovative platform for biosensors. Porous silicon has been intensively
investigated for a variety of applications such as chemical and biological sensors,
medical diagnostics, optical band pass filters, microchemical reactors, and
microfuel cells [1]. Moreover, Si-based matrixes have been proved to be a very useful support
for the immobilization of enzymes thanks to their capability of retaining biological
activity [2]. Silicon (Si) received a lot of attention due to its specific
semiconductor properties and furthermore because it allows the development of a
broad range of micropatterning processes in order to achieve functional features for
future integration in complex systems.Furthermore, the Si-H and Si-OH groups on porous silicon surface can be easily
modified by many reactive reagents and derivatives with receptors, thus enabling the
identification of ligands [3]. Microreactors are miniaturized reaction systems fabricated by
microtechnology and precision engineering. The microreactors work with micro and
nanoliter volumes of reaction media and ensure high efficiency and reproducibility
of biocatalytic processes. Enzymatic microreactors have been already proposed as
integrated components termed lab-on-a-chip for analytical applications in micrototal
analysis systems (MTAS) [4]. There, the immobilization strategies to graft different chemical
substances on the surface of a microreactor, a support, are used for a design of
necessary conditions within the microreactor spaces. Surface modification by
silanization is a very common method for particle functionalization. High density of
free amino groups (-NH2) lying outwards the particle surface provides an excellent
media for further chemical surface modification such as enzyme cross-linking with
glutaraldehyde [5]. The immobilization of enzymes in microreactors is mostly carried out in
a covalent way. The main advantage of covalent immobilization is the retention of
the enzyme during the whole biocatalytic process [6]. Actually, immobilization is a well-established approach in a wide range
of industrial applications. Both synthetic and natural inorganic materials such as
clay, glass beads, silice-based materials, and celite have been used to immobilize
enzymes, the natural catalysts for many biological processes. Among them, mesoporous
silicates are the most interesting due to their attractive properties, availability,
and simple preparation [7]. Peroxidase immobilization on inorganic mesoporous silicates has proven
to be an interesting alternative to improve enzyme functionality [8]. The large regular repeating structures of photonic porous silicon
structure offer the possibility of adsorbing or entrapping large biomolecules within
their pores, providing a suitable microenvironment to stabilize the enzyme.Peroxidases (EC 1.11.1.7, etc.) belong to a large family of enzymes that
participate in a large number of natural processes developed in living organisms.
They are ubiquitous in fungi, plants, and vertebrates [9]. Their principal active sites contain a heme prosthetic group or,
alternately, residues of redox-active cysteine or seleno-cysteine groups that are
able to oxidize a large number of organic compounds initiated by one electron
oxidation step [10]. For all peroxidases, the natural substrate is hydrogen peroxide, but the
oxidative process can be performed with many other organic hydro-peroxides such as
lipid peroxides. In the oxidation of phenols or aromatic amines, peroxidases produce
free radicals that may dimerise or polymerize and thus, in general, form products
that are much less soluble in water. This property might be used in removing
carcinogenic aromatic amines and phenols from industrial aqueous effluents. Enzymes
are also involved in degradation of aromatic compounds and other xenobiotics,
including pesticides, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and dioxins [11], and thus can be used for removal of aromatic pollutants [12,13] as antioxidant [14], as indicators for food processing [15], in bioelectrodes [16] and in the synthesis of conducting materials [17]. Peroxidases could also be used in the synthesis of fine chemicals and
optically and biologically active oxide. Despite the obviously practical value of
peroxidases, at present, their commercial uses are limited, primarily due to its low
stability in the presence of hydrogen peroxide, their natural substrate. All
heme-proteins, including peroxidases, are inactivated in the presence of some
concentrations of hydrogen peroxide. This process, described as a suicide
inactivation, is especially important in the absence of reducing substrates, but its
mechanism has not been yet fully elucidated [18]. Although the interest to peroxidase started several decades ago, their
application as biocatalysts in industrial processes is still negligible due to its
inherent instability under operational conditions, mainly caused by the inactivation
in the presence of hydrogen peroxide. The development of techniques for enzyme
stabilizing can improve a number of biocatalytic industrial processes. In this work,
peroxidase enzyme has been immobilized onto porous silicon (PS) supports for the
possible prevention from its self-inactivation and its stability under different
operational conditions has been analyzed.
Methods
A commercial peroxidase, Baylase® RP, was kindly donated by Bayer Mexico
(Mexico, Federal District, Mexico). Crystalline silicon was a product from Cemat
Silicon (Warsaw, Poland). Glutaraldehyde, 3-aminopropyldiethoxysilane, guaiacol, and
bovine serum albumin were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Bradford reagent
was from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA, USA). All other chemical reagents used in our
experiment were of analytical grade without further purification.
Microreactor fabrication
Fabrication of porous silicon(PS) <100 > oriented, heavily
doped p-type Si wafers with resistivity 0.002 to 0.005 ohm-cm were
electrochemically etched with an electrolyte composed of HF/ethanol/glycerol
(3:7:1 (v/v)) at a constant current density of
50 mA cm-2 for 170 s to obtain a porous layer of
3,000 ± 60 nm.
Functionalization of porous support
The porous silicon samples were subjected to thermal oxidation in air at
600°C for 60 min. Silanization process with
3-aminopropyldiethoxysilane (APDES) was performed by immersing the sample in a
5% APDES in toluene for a period of 1 h and annealed at 110°C for
15 min. Glutaraldehyde (GTA, 2.5%) in phosphate buffer pH 6.0 was
subsequently coupled to the support for 1 h and finally incubated with
peroxidase for 24 h at 4°C. After each step of functionalization, the
percent reflectance was measured and the chemical modification of the surface
was verified by FTIR.
RIFTS, SEM, FTIR, and gravimetric measurement of enzymatic microreactor
Reflective interferometric Fourier transform method provides a fast and
convenient method of extracting the basic optical parameters modified during the
bio-functionalization steps onto of the PS surface. This method presents high
sensitivity to small changes in the average refractive index of the porous thin
film, allowing for direct and real-time monitoring of the binding of different
species to the pore walls [19-22]. Reflective interferometric Fourier transform spectroscopy RIFTS
analysis was performed on the specular reflectivity spectra of the PS measured
with UV-VIS-NIR spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer Lambda 950, Waltham, MA, USA). As
gravimetric measurement is the most direct method of determining the porosity of
porous silicon [23-25], the measured porosity of the sample is found to be approximately
80%.The surface and cross section image of mesoporous silicon was obtained by
scanning electron microscope (SEM). Fourier transform infrared (FTIR)
spectroscopy was used to identify and characterize the functional groups on the
porous silicon surface. The FTIR spectra were collected at a resolution of
2 cm-1 on a Cary 640/660 FTIR Spectrometer - with an ATR
accessory (Agilent Technologies, Mexico, Federal District, Mexico).
Enzyme assays
Steady-state measurements for peroxidase activity were carried out
spectrophotometrically using guaiacol as electron donor substrate. Peroxidase
activity was measured in 1 mL reaction solution containing 60 mM
sodium phosphate buffer pH 6.0 at 25 to 28°C using 3 mM guaiacol,
1 mM hydrogen peroxide as the substrates and by monitoring the absorbance
changes at λ = 470 nm using molar extinction
coefficient value of 26.6 mM-1 cm-1 for the
product tetra-guaiacol formed by the enzymatic reaction [26]. One unit of peroxidase activity was defined as the amount of enzyme
that caused the formation of micromoles of tetraguaiacol per min. The protein
content was determined by Bradford method with the BioRad protein reagent.
Specific and non-specific immobilization
In an effort to compare the specific and non-specific immobilization of the
enzyme load onto the microreactors, three different microreactors has been
designed, (1) oxidized support immobilized with enzyme, (2) oxidized and ADPES
treated then enzyme immobilization, and (3) oxidized, ADPES, and
glutaraldehyde-activated surface incubated with the enzyme. The peroxidase
activity of the anchored enzymes onto the pores of microreactors was detected by
absorption spectroscopy using guaiacol as substrate at 470 nm.
Stability assays
Three different stabilities were tested for soluble and immobilized peroxidase
preparations: Thermostability by incubating at 50°C, stability to organic
solvent by incubating in 50% acetronitrile, and against inactivation in the
presence of hydrogen peroxide (1 mM). In all cases, aliquots of each sample
were withdrawn at different times and assayed for enzymatic activity under the
standard condition. The data were adjusted to first-order rate model in order to
calculate inactivation rate constants under each condition.
Results and discussion
Preparation of porous silicon substrates
As shown in Figure 1, the oxidized samples were
epoxy-silanized with ADPES to obtain an amine-terminated group. 3-Aminopropyl
(diethoxy) methyl silane have been used for surface modification [27], as their bi-functional nature is expected to offer the possibility
to covalently attach a bio-molecule, either directly or through a linker.
Supports activated with glutaraldehyde or the treatment of the adsorbed enzymes
with glutaraldehyde produces a covalent attachment of the enzyme onto the
support with glutaraldehyde as a spacer arm, conferring stability to covalently
bound enzymes [28]. A detailed view of the surface morphology and thickness has been
obtained using the scanning electron microscope (SEM). The porous layer is
3,000 ± 60 nm thick shown in Figure 2a, with interconnecting cylindrical pores ranging in diameter from
30 to 50 nm can be seen in Figure 2b. The pore
size distribution is relatively uniform and the columnar walls are thin.
Figure 1
Schematic diagram illustrating the general process from porous silicon
functionalization to enzyme coupling. (a) Functionalization of
oxidized porous support with ADPES. (b) Attachment of aldehyde
group using glutaraldehyde. (c) Covalent attachment of peroxidase
to the support through the formation of peptide bond between the
aldehyde group and amino acids of the enzyme.
Figure 2
SEM observation of porous silicon structure fabricated, (a) cross
section, (b) sample surface.
Schematic diagram illustrating the general process from porous silicon
functionalization to enzyme coupling. (a) Functionalization of
oxidized porous support with ADPES. (b) Attachment of aldehyde
group using glutaraldehyde. (c) Covalent attachment of peroxidase
to the support through the formation of peptide bond between the
aldehyde group and amino acids of the enzyme.SEM observation of porous silicon structure fabricated, (a) cross
section, (b) sample surface.
Fourier transform are widely involved in spectroscopy in all research areas that
require high accuracy, sensitivity, and resolution [29-31]. It should be noted that the nanostructure is designed to allow
proper infiltration of the peroxidase enzyme (approximate size of 40 KDa),
characterized by an average diameter of 60 to 80 Å, considering a
globular conformation The functionalization of each compound was monitored
through shift in reflectance peak. It is expected that the chemical modification
of the porous nanostructure (as outlined in Figure 3) will result in an increase of the optical thickness (i.e., red shift
of second) due to the increase in the average refractive index upon attachment
of different species to the pore walls.
Figure 3
Shift in optical thickness (2nd) of the porous silicon structure after
functionalization. The increase of the refractive index after
the incubation in APDES and GTA results in a red shift in the
reflectance peak, and hence, the corresponding change in optical
thickness is observed.
Shift in optical thickness (2nd) of the porous silicon structure after
functionalization. The increase of the refractive index after
the incubation in APDES and GTA results in a red shift in the
reflectance peak, and hence, the corresponding change in optical
thickness is observed.
FTIR studies
Figure 4 shows a FTIR spectrum measured after
oxidation step and after immobilization. The reference spectrum of oxidized
porous silicon support shows two bands corresponding to the characteristic
asymmetric stretching mode of Si-O at 1,050 to 1,100 cm-1 and
the Si-OH bond at 825 cm-1[32]. The spectra of immobilized support show a sharp band of silanol at
about 3,730 cm-1 and a band at 3,350 cm-1
correspond to the asymmetric stretching modes of -NH2 groups. [33]. Functionalization with ADPES resulted in a band related to Si-O-Si
at 1,034 cm-1, which confirms that the siloxane bonding between
ADPES and oxidized support has taken place [34]. The asymmetric and symmetric deformation modes of the CH3 group from
ethoxy moieties of APTES are observed around 1,440 cm-1[35]. The peak at 1,691 cm-1 corresponds to Amide I, the
most intense absorption band in proteins. It is primarily governed by the
stretching vibrations of the C = O (70 to 85%) and C-N groups (10 to
20%) [36]. The setup of spectroscopic analysis presented above confirms the
effective immobilization of a biocatalyst onto the surface of PS support.
Figure 4
Attenuated total reflectance (ATR) spectrum of PS structure with
immobilized peroxidase taken after all the functionalization
steps. FTIR analysis reveals some characteristic peaks of
different functional group and peroxidase that has been infiltrated into
the porous support.
Attenuated total reflectance (ATR) spectrum of PS structure with
immobilized peroxidase taken after all the functionalization
steps. FTIR analysis reveals some characteristic peaks of
different functional group and peroxidase that has been infiltrated into
the porous support.Table 1 shows the enzyme activity and protein load of
three different microreactors. The microreactor in which enzyme was loaded after
glutaraldehyde shows maximum activity in comparison to the other two
microreactors. Type of activation, its presence, distribution, and density of
functional groups determines the activity yields of an immobilization reaction
and operational stability of the carrier-fixed enzyme. Compared to non-specific
adsorption, specific adsorption often orients the enzyme molecule in a direction
allowed by the nature of binding and the spatial complementary effect which may
contribute for the higher activity in glutaraldehyde-activated
microreactors.
Table 1
Effect of immobilization chemistry on the enzyme loading onto PS
support
Microreactors
Enzyme activity (U)
Protein (mg)
Oxidized + enzyme
0.193/50 ml
1.8/50 ml
Oxidized + ADPES + enzyme
0.276/100 ml
2.4/100 ml
Oxidized + ADPES + GTA + enzyme
0.712/100 ml
3.9/100 ml
Effect of immobilization chemistry on the enzyme loading onto PS
support
Effect of PS layer thickness on the enzymatic activity
Peroxidase immobilization onto the microreactor with different thickness of the
layer indicates that large amount of enzyme has been immobilized onto the
thicker layer but are not available for the substrate conversion (data shown in
Table 2). In most cases, a large surface area and
high porosity are desirable, so that enzyme and substrate (guaiacol) can easily
penetrate. A pore size of >30 nm seems to make the internal surface
accessible for immobilization of most enzymes. All reactions of immobilized
enzymes must obey the physicochemical laws of mass transfer and their interplay
with enzyme catalysis [37].
Table 2
Effect of PS layer thickness (Si wafer) on the enzymatic activity
Thickness of the porous layer
Enzyme activity
Protein
(U cm-2)
(mg cm-2)
Crystalline silicon
No detectable activity
0.32
500 nm
0.576
2.15
4,000 nm
0.456
3.52
Effect of PS layer thickness (Si wafer) on the enzymatic activity
Thermal stability of immobilized peroxidase enzyme
Thermo-stability is the ability of an enzyme to resist against thermal unfolding
in the absence of substrates. The relative thermal stability of the free
versus immobilized enzymes was compared at 50°C (Figure
5). The results suggested that the immobilized enzyme
is inactivated more rapidly compared to the soluble enzyme as indicated by the
inactivation constant rate. The decrease in the thermal stability of the
immobilized support is attributed to the thermal conductance of silicon
resulting in the major heat transfer from Si support to the enzyme (thermal
conductivity of silica 8 W m
k), as has been observed in other reports [38].
Figure 5
First-order rate constant calculations from semi-logarithmic plot of
residual activity of soluble and immobilized peroxidase during
incubation (50°C).
First-order rate constant calculations from semi-logarithmic plot of
residual activity of soluble and immobilized peroxidase during
incubation (50°C).
Stability of peroxidase in aqueous-organic solvent mixture
As the stabilization of enzymes is one of the most complex challenges in protein
chemistry, the stability of soluble and immobilized peroxidase has also been
investigated in aqueous solution containing 50% acetonitrile. As shown in
Figure 6, the immobilized peroxidase showed a
greater tolerance to acetonitrile by retaining 80% of the catalytic efficiency
in comparison to the soluble enzyme which lost 95% of its activity after
2 h. Organic solvents can inactivate enzymes in several ways: the organic
solvent molecules can interact with the biocatalyst, disrupting the secondary
bonds in the native structure; they can strip the essential water molecules from
the hydration shell altering the structure of the enzyme; or they can interact
with the active site of the biocatalyst, causing inactivation.
Figure 6
First-order rate constant calculations from semi-logarithmic plot of
residual activity of soluble and immobilized peroxidase during
incubation (50% acetonitrile). The insert shows an amplification
of immobilized enzyme profile.
First-order rate constant calculations from semi-logarithmic plot of
residual activity of soluble and immobilized peroxidase during
incubation (50% acetonitrile). The insert shows an amplification
of immobilized enzyme profile.
Stability of peroxidase in the presence of hydrogen peroxide
The stability of peroxidase in the presence of hydrogen peroxide is a key issue
because peroxidase becomes inactive in the presence of excess hydrogen peroxide;
therefore, the effects of hydrogen peroxide on the stability of the enzyme were
investigated. As expected, the activities of the free peroxidase decreased
rapidly in the presence of hydrogen peroxide, with a decrease to less than 50%
of the initial activities occurring within 40 min. On the other hand,
immobilized peroxidase showed a slightly lower inactivation rate, suggesting no
significant protection of the enzyme against hydrogen peroxide, due to the
binding of the enzyme to PS matrix as shown in Figure 7.
Figure 7
First-order rate constant calculations from semi-logarithmic plot of
residual activity of soluble and immobilized peroxidase with H
O
incubation.
First-order rate constant calculations from semi-logarithmic plot of
residual activity of soluble and immobilized peroxidase with H
O
incubation.
Conclusions
This work is focused on porous silicon surface functionalization through the covalent
attachment of the peroxidase enzyme with the PS support. The immobilization of the
enzyme onto the porous silicon support has been confirmed from the RIFTS and FTIR
studies. The study of thickness of the porous layer onto the availability of enzyme
showed that higher thickness hinders the passage of substrate into the pores, which
results in lower activity. The immobilized support showed lower thermo-stability
with respect to soluble/free enzyme due to the major heat transfer through silicon
support. The inactivation profile of peroxidase in the presence of acetonitrile
indicates that the immobilized peroxidase is protected from acetonitrile
deactivation; thus, acetonitrile has been revealed to be a very promising solvent to
perform biocatalysis with peroxidase in organic media. While the deactivation of the
enzyme in the presence of H2O2 in immobilized support is
almost similar as compared to the soluble enzyme, these results conclude that a
commercial peroxidase enzyme immobilized onto the porous silicon nanostructure
confers more stability against organic solvents for potential industrial
applications.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
P.S. carried out all the experimental work. M.A. helped in the biological part of the
experiments. P.S. and V.A. jointly discussed and wrote the manuscript. V.A. and
R.V.D. conceived the experiments. All the authors analyzed and discussed the
results. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Authors' information
P.S. is a third year PG student at CIICAp, UAEM. RVD is a senior scientist in
Biotechnology Institute (IBT) of National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM)
working in the field of nano-biotechnology and bio-catalysis. MA is a scientist in
IBT UNAM. VA is a senior scientist working in Research Centre for Engineering and
Applied Sciences in the field of porous silicon and its applications.
Authors: Michael P Schwartz; Austin M Derfus; Sara D Alvarez; Sangeeta N Bhatia; Michael J Sailor Journal: Langmuir Date: 2006-08-01 Impact factor: 3.882
Authors: Claudia Pacholski; Marta Sartor; Michael J Sailor; Frédérique Cunin; Gordon M Miskelly Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2005-08-24 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Cristian Felipe Ramirez-Gutierrez; Harol David Martinez-Hernandez; Ivan Alonso Lujan-Cabrera; Mario Enrique Rodriguez-García Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-10-14 Impact factor: 4.379