Literature DB >> 25221420

Sensitivity Analysis of Multiple Informant Models When Data are Not Missing at Random.

Shelley A Blozis1, Xiaojia Ge2, Shu Xu3, Misaki N Natsuaki4, Daniel S Shaw5, Jenae Neiderhiser3, Laura Scaramella6, Leslie Leve7, David Reiss8.   

Abstract

Missing data are common in studies that rely on multiple informant data to evaluate relationships among variables for distinguishable individuals clustered within groups. Estimation of structural equation models using raw data allows for incomplete data, and so all groups may be retained even if only one member of a group contributes data. Statistical inference is based on the assumption that data are missing completely at random or missing at random. Importantly, whether or not data are missing is assumed to be independent of the missing data. A saturated correlates model that incorporates correlates of the missingness or the missing data into an analysis and multiple imputation that may also use such correlates offer advantages over the standard implementation of SEM when data are not missing at random because these approaches may result in a data analysis problem for which the missingness is ignorable. This paper considers these approaches in an analysis of family data to assess the sensitivity of parameter estimates to assumptions about missing data, a strategy that may be easily implemented using SEM software.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 25221420      PMCID: PMC4162658          DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2013.769393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Struct Equ Modeling        ISSN: 1070-5511            Impact factor:   6.125


  19 in total

1.  A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures.

Authors:  L M Collins; J L Schafer; C M Kam
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2001-12

2.  On the performance of random-coefficient pattern-mixture models for non-ignorable drop-out.

Authors:  Hakan Demirtas; Joseph L Schafer
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Detecting, measuring, and testing dyadic patterns in the actor-partner interdependence model.

Authors:  David A Kenny; Thomas Ledermann
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2010-06

4.  Familism, mother-daughter mutuality, and suicide attempts of adolescent Latinas.

Authors:  Ana A Baumann; Jill A Kuhlberg; Luis H Zayas
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2010-10

Review 5.  Using multilevel models to analyze couple and family treatment data: basic and advanced issues.

Authors:  David C Atkins
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2005-03

6.  Where's poppa? The relative lack of attention to the role of fathers in child and adolescent psychopathology.

Authors:  V Phares
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1992-05

7.  How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory.

Authors:  John W Graham; Allison E Olchowski; Tamika D Gilreath
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2007-06-05

8.  Selection models for repeated measurements with non-random dropout: an illustration of sensitivity.

Authors:  M G Kenward
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Should I stay or should I go? Predicting dating relationship stability from four aspects of commitment.

Authors:  Galena K Rhoades; Scott M Stanley; Howard J Markman
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2010-10

10.  The association between adolescents' depressive symptoms, maternal negative affect, and family relationships in Hong Kong: cross-sectional and longitudinal findings.

Authors:  Sharron S K Leung; Sunita M Stewart; Joy P S Wong; Daniel S Y Ho; Daniel Y T Fong; T H Lam
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2009-10
View more
  4 in total

1.  Parenting and prenatal risk as moderators of genetic influences on conduct problems during middle childhood.

Authors:  Kristine Marceau; Emily Rolan; Leslie D Leve; Jody M Ganiban; David Reiss; Daniel S Shaw; Misaki N Natsuaki; Helen L Egger; Jenae M Neiderhiser
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2019-03-07

2.  Bayesian Sensitivity Analysis of a Nonlinear Dynamic Factor Analysis Model with Nonparametric Prior and Possible Nonignorable Missingness.

Authors:  Niansheng Tang; Sy-Miin Chow; Joseph G Ibrahim; Hongtu Zhu
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  The Early Growth and Development Study: a prospective adoption study from birth through middle childhood.

Authors:  Leslie D Leve; Jenae M Neiderhiser; Daniel S Shaw; Jody Ganiban; Misaki N Natsuaki; David Reiss
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 1.587

4.  The (Ir)Responsibility of (Under)Estimating Missing Data.

Authors:  María P Fernández-García; Guillermo Vallejo-Seco; Pablo Livácic-Rojas; Ellian Tuero-Herrero
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.