| Literature DB >> 25221388 |
Marília Beatriz de Cuba1, Marcus Paulo Ribeiro Machado1, Thais Soares Farnesi1, Angelica Cristina Alves1, Livia Alves Martins1, Lucas Felipe de Oliveira1, Caroline Santos Capitelli1, Camila Ferreira Leite1, Marcos Vinícius Silva1, Juliana Reis Machado1, Henrique Borges Kappel1, Helioswilton Sales de Campos1, Luciano Paiva1, Natália Lins da Silva Gomes2, Ana Carolina Guimarães Faleiros1, Constança Felicia de Paoli de Carvalho Britto2, Wilson Savino2, Otacílio Cruz Moreira2, Virmondes Rodrigues1, Nicola Montano3, Eliane Lages-Silva1, Luis Eduardo Ramirez1, Valdo Jose Dias da Silva1.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to assess the effects of an anticholinesterase agent, pyridostigmine bromide (Pyrido), on experimental chronic Chagas heart disease in mice. To this end, male C57BL/6J mice noninfected (control:Con) or chronically infected (5 months) with Trypanosoma cruzi (chagasic:Chg) were treated or not (NT) with Pyrido for one month. At the end of this period, electrocardiogram (ECG); cardiac autonomic function; heart histopathology; serum cytokines; and the presence of blood and tissue parasites by means of immunohistochemistry and PCR were assessed. In NT-Chg mice, significant changes in the electrocardiographic, autonomic, and cardiac histopathological profiles were observed confirming a chronic inflammatory response. Treatment with Pyrido in Chagasic mice caused a significant reduction of myocardial inflammatory infiltration, fibrosis, and hypertrophy, which was accompanied by a decrease in serum levels of IFNγ with no change in IL-10 levels, suggesting a shift of immune response toward an anti-inflammatory profile. Lower nondifferent numbers of parasite DNA copies were observed in both treated and nontreated chagasic mice. In conclusion, our findings confirm the marked neuroimmunomodulatory role played by the parasympathetic autonomic nervous system in the evolution of the inflammatory-immune response to T. cruzi during experimental chronic Chagas heart disease in mice.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25221388 PMCID: PMC4158292 DOI: 10.1155/2014/475946
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mediators Inflamm ISSN: 0962-9351 Impact factor: 4.711
Electrocardiogram before treatment with pyridostigmine bromide. Electrocardiographical parameters (expressed as mean ± S.E.M.) collected after five months follow-up in noninoculated control (Con) or T. cruzi-inoculated (Chg) anesthetized C57BL/6j mice before treatment with pyridostigmine bromide (Pyrido) or vehicle (NT: nontreated animals).
| Con-NT | Con-Pyrido | Chg-NT | Chg-Pyrido | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( | ( | |
| RR (ms) | 139.73 ± 5.22 | 150.83 ± 6.02 | 139.04 ± 5.62 | 133.35 ± 4.04 |
| Pd (ms) | 13.87 ± 1.50 | 13.8 ± 1.37 | 18.56 ± 0.51∗# | 18.84 ± 0.72∗# |
| PR (ms) | 38.83 ± 2.61 | 38.72 ± 2.28 | 40.64 ± 0.98 | 40.17 ± 1.29 |
| QRSd (ms) | 14.6 ± 1.86 | 13.61 ± 1.43 | 17.53 ± 1.08∗# | 17.06 ± 1.00∗# |
| QT (ms) | 20.74 ± 2.26 | 17.14 ± 1.60 | 22.28 ± 0.96∗# | 21.2 ± 1.01# |
| cQT (ms1/2) | 1.74 ± 0.51 | 1.42 ± 0.50 | 1.9 ± 0.08∗# | 1.84 ± 0.09# |
RR: RR interval; Pd: P wave duration; PR: PR interval; QRSd: QRS complex duration; QT: QT interval; cQT: corrected QT interval; ms: milliseconds; *P < 0.05 versus Con-NT; and # P < 0.05 versus Con-Pyrido.
Electrocardiogram after treatment with pyridostigmine bromide. Electrocardiographical parameters (expressed as mean ± S.E.M.) collected at the 6th month of observation and after one month of treatment (from the 5th to 6th month of infection) in noninoculated control (Con) or T. cruzi-inoculated (Chg) anesthetized C57BL/6j mice treated with pyridostigmine bromide (Pyrido) or vehicle (NT: nontreated animals).
| Con-NT | Con-Pyrido | Chg-NT | Chg-Pyrido | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( | ( | |
| RR (ms) | 137.56 ± 3.37 | 141.05 ± 5.38 | 152.54 ± 5.01∗ | 152.98 ± 12.93 |
| Pd (ms) | 14.01 ± 1.53 | 13.38 ± 1.51 | 18.68 ± 0.52∗&# | 14.63 ± 0.53 |
| PR (ms) | 37.93 ± 1.96 | 44.38 ± 2.51∗ | 45.45 ± 2.22∗ | 43.2 ± 0.99 |
| QRSd (ms) | 14.45 ± 1.39 | 13.47 ± 1.37 | 15.04 ± 0.53 | 14.5 ± 0.41 |
| QT (ms) | 17.77 ± 1.87 | 17.35 ± 1.38 | 22.47 ± 1.04∗# | 18.21 ± 0.59 |
| cQT (ms1/2) | 1.51 ± 0.51 | 1.49 ± 0.47 | 1.83 ± 0.09∗&# | 1.51 ± 0.06 |
RR: RR interval; Pd: P wave duration; PR: PR interval; QRSd: QRS complex duration; QT: QT interval; cQT: corrected QT interval; *P < 0.05 versus Con-NT; ms: milliseconds; & P < 0.05 versus Chg-Pyrido; and # P < 0.05 versus Con-Pyrido.
Heart rate variability after treatment with pyridostigmine bromide. Heart rate variability parameters (expressed as mean ± S.E.M.) collected at the 6th month of observation and after one month of treatment (from the 5th to 6th month of infection) in noninoculated control (Con) or T. cruzi-inoculated (Chg) freely moving C57BL/6j mice treated with pyridostigmine bromide (Pyrido) or vehicle (NT: nontreated animals).
| Con-NT | Con-Pyrido | Chg-NT | Chg-Pyrido | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( | ( | |
| RR (ms) | 117.97 ± 3.97 | 112.67 ± 4.14 | 104.27 ± 4.32 | 113.74 ± 4.33 |
| HR (bpm) | 516.81 ± 8.35 | 543.57 ± 9.06 | 590.61 ± 9.82 | 539.07 ± 8.76 |
| Variance (ms2) | 218.61 ± 12.35 | 148.96 ± 9.91 | 32.13 ± 5.12∗& | 63.57 ± 6.11 |
| VLF (ms2) | 106.06 ± 8.93 | 69.37 ± 7.23 | 11.76 ± 2.84∗& | 22.60 ± 3.90 |
| LF (ms2) | 57.84 ± 6.28 | 52.31 ± 6.23 | 11.10 ± 3.77∗ | 21.99 ± 5.09 |
| LF (nu) | 51.83 ± 4.13 | 56.24 ± 4.09 | 47.80 ± 4.57 | 39.25 ± 4.91 |
| HF (ms2) | 54.71 ± 6.86 | 27.19 ± 4.44 | 9.01 ± 3.19∗& | 18.78 ± 3.53 |
| HF (nu) | 47.54 ± 4.11 | 41.80 ± 3.97 | 48.05 ± 4.49 | 58.70 ± 4.86 |
| LF/HF | 2.31 ± 1.53 | 4.04 ± 1.48 | 2.60 ± 1.54 | 2.92 ± 2.01 |
RR: RR interval; HR: heart rate; VLF: very low frequency spectral component; LF: low frequency spectral component; HF: high frequency spectral component; ms: milliseconds; bpm: beats per minute; nu: normalized units; *P < 0.05 versus Con-NT; and & P < 0.05 versus Chg-Pyrido.
Figure 1Heart rate responses to pharmacological autonomic blockade. Heart rate responses (ΔHR) to propranolol (sympathetic effect) (Panel (a)) or to atropine sulfate (vagal parasympathetic effect) (Panel (b)) expressed as mean ± S.E.M. and measured at the 6th month of observation and after one month of treatment (from the 5th to 6th month of infection) in noninoculated control (Con) or in T. cruzi-inoculated (Chg) freely moving C57BL/6j mice treated with pyridostigmine bromide (Pyrido) or vehicle (NT: nontreated animals). (*P < 0.05 versus Con-NT; & P < 0.05 versus Chg-NT).
Figure 2Relative cardiac weights after treatment with pyridostigmine bromide. Relative cardiac weights (in mg/g) expressed as mean ± S.E.M. calculated at the 6th month of observation and after one month of treatment (from the 5th to 6th month of infection) in noninoculated control (Con) or in T. cruzi-inoculated (Chg) C57BL/6j mice treated with pyridostigmine bromide (Pyrido) or vehicle (NT: non treated animals). (*P < 0.05 versus Con-NT and & P < 0.05 versus Chg-NT).
Figure 3Cardiac histopathology after treatment with pyridostigmine bromide. Photomicrographs of cardiac sections stained with H-E. Panels (a) and (b): ventricular sections from a control nontreated mouse. Panels (c) and (d): ventricular sections from a pyridostigmine bromide-treated control mouse. Panels (e) and (f): ventricular sections from a chagasic nontreated mouse. Panels (g) and (h): atrial sections from a nontreated chagasic mouse showing, respectively, a ganglionitis and neuritis focus. Panels (i), (j), (k), and (l): different ventricular sections from a chagasic mouse treated with pyridostigmine bromide. Note the lower inflammatory infiltration into heart tissues from a chagasic mouse treated with pyridostigmine bromide. (Left panels: magnification = 100x; right panels: magnification = 200x.)
Figure 4Cardiac fibrosis after treatment with pyridostigmine bromide. Fibrotic areas (in μm2) expressed as mean ± S.E.M. for the right (Panel (a)) and left (Panel (b)) atria, the right (Panel (c)) and left (Panel (d)) ventricles, and the atrioventricular septum (Panel (e)), measured after Picrosirius Red staining at the 6th month of observation and after one month of treatment (from the 5th to 6th month of infection) in noninoculated control (Con) or in T. cruzi-inoculated (Chg) C57BL/6j mice treated with pyridostigmine bromide (Pyrido) or vehicle (NT: nontreated animals). (*P < 0.05 versus Con-NT; & P < 0.05 versus Chg-Pyrido; and # P < 0.05 versus Con-Pyrido).
Figure 5Serum cytokines after treatment with pyridostigmine bromide. Serum levels (in pg/mL) expressed as mean ± S.E.M. of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α: Panel (a)), interleukin-5 (IL-5: Panel (b)) measured by the cytometric bead array technique, interferon-γ (IFN-γ: Panel (c)), and interleukin-10 (IL-10: Panel (d)) measured by ELISA at the 6th month of observation and after one month of treatment (from the 5th to 6th month of infection) in noninoculated control (Con) or T. cruzi-inoculated (Chg) C57BL/6j mice treated or not (NT) with pyridostigmine bromide (Pyrido). (*P < 0.05 versus Con-NT; & P < 0.05 versus Chg-Pyrido; and # P < 0.05 versus Con-Pyrido).
Figure 6Immunohistochemistry for parasite antigens. Photomicrographs from left ventricular sections stained with T. cruzi antigens by peroxidase reaction. Panels (a) and (d): control nontreated mouse. Panels (b) and (e): chagasic nontreated mouse. Panels (c) and (f): chagasic mouse treated with pyridostigmine bromide. Top panels: magnification = 100x; bottom panels: magnification = 200x. Note the gray color labeling T. cruzi antigens throughout the sections in Panels (b), (c), (e), and (f).