Literature DB >> 25221332

Electrical storm induced by cardiac resynchronization therapy is determined by pacing on epicardial scar and can be successfully managed by catheter ablation.

Carla Roque1, Nicola Trevisi1, John Silberbauer1, Teresa Oloriz1, Hiroya Mizuno1, Francesca Baratto1, Caterina Bisceglia1, Nicoleta Sora1, Alessandra Marzi1, Andrea Radinovic1, Fabrizio Guarracini1, Pasquale Vergara1, Simone Sala1, Gabriele Paglino1, Simone Gulletta1, Patrizio Mazzone1, Manuela Cireddu1, Giuseppe Maccabelli1, Paolo Della Bella2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The mechanism of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)-induced proarrhythmia remains unknown. We postulated that pacing from a left ventricular (LV) lead positioned on epicardial scar can facilitate re-entrant ventricular tachycardia. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between CRT-induced proarrhythmia and LV lead location within scar. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Twenty-eight epicardial and 63 endocardial maps, obtained from 64 CRT patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia ablation, were analyzed. A positive LV lead/scar relationship, defined as a lead tip positioned on scar/border zone, was determined by overlaying fluoroscopic projections with LV electroanatomical maps. CRT-induced proarrhythmia occurred in 8 patients (12.5%). They all presented early with electrical storm (100% versus 39% of patients with no proarrhythmia; P<0.01), requiring temporary biventricular pacing discontinuation in half of cases. They more frequently presented with heart failure/cardiogenic shock (50% versus 7%; P<0.01), requiring intensive care management. Ventricular tachycardia was re-entrant in all. The LV lead location within epicardial scar was significantly more frequent in the proarrhythmia group (60% versus 9% P=0.03 on epicardial bipolar scar, 80% versus 17% P=0.02 on epicardial unipolar scar, and 80% versus 17% P=0.02 on any-epicardial scar). Ablation was performed within epicardial scar, close to the LV lead, and allowed CRT reactivation in all patients.
CONCLUSIONS: CRT-induced proarrhythmia presented early with electrical storm and was associated with an LV lead positioning within epicardial scar. Catheter ablation allowed for resumption of biventricular stimulation in all patients.
© 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac resynchronization therapy; catheter ablation; tachycardia, ventricular

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25221332     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.114.001796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1941-3084


  18 in total

1.  Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy and Heart Failure: Persepctive from 5P Medicine.

Authors:  Fang Fang; Zhou Yu Jie; Luo Xiu Xia; Liu Ming; Ma Zhan; Gan Shu Fen; Yu Cheuk-Man
Journal:  Card Fail Rev       Date:  2015-04

2.  Precision Medicine for Cardiac Resynchronization: Predicting Quality of Life Benefits for Individual Patients-An Analysis From 5 Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Michael E Nassif; Yuanyuan Tang; John G Cleland; William T Abraham; Cecilia Linde; Michael R Gold; James B Young; J Claude Daubert; Lou Sherfesee; Dan Schaber; Anthony S L Tang; Philip G Jones; Suzanne V Arnold; John A Spertus
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 8.790

3.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy-induced proarrhythmia: understanding preferential conduction within myocardial scars.

Authors:  Jason S Bradfield; Kalyanam Shivkumar
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-12

4.  Right ventricular lead induced ventricular arrhythmia-A rare complication of cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Dawid Miśkowiec; Paweł Życiński; Dariusz H Qawoq; Piotr Pagórek; Piotr Zając; Michał Chudzik; Tomasz Wcisło; Jarosław D Kasprzak
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 1.468

5.  Arrhythmic Recurrence and Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized With First Episode of Electrical Storm.

Authors:  Juan Ignacio Damonte; Marco Giuseppe Del Buono; Georgia K Thomas; James Mbualungu; Bennett Clark; Rocco Antonio Montone; Daniel H Berrocal; Tamas S Gal; Le Kang; Juan Lu; Benjamin Van Tassell; Jayanthi Koneru; Thomas C Crawford; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Antonio Abbate; Jordana Kron
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.133

6.  Myocardial infarction induces structural and functional remodelling of the intrinsic cardiac nervous system.

Authors:  Pradeep S Rajendran; Keijiro Nakamura; Olujimi A Ajijola; Marmar Vaseghi; J Andrew Armour; Jeffrey L Ardell; Kalyanam Shivkumar
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Risk factors for ventricular tachyarrhythmic events in patients without left bundle branch block who receive cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Arwa Younis; Mehmet K Aktas; Wojciech Zareba; Scott McNitt; Valentina Kutyifa; Ilan Goldenberg
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 1.468

8.  Proarrhythmic effects of dynamic atrioventricular delay programming in a patient with cardiac resynchronization therapy and activity-induced atrioventricular node dysfunction.

Authors:  Luke Chong; Ryan Kipp
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2022-02-01

9.  Polymorphic ventricular arrhythmia triggered by temporary epicardial right ventricular stimulation after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Carlos Lopez; Teresa Oloriz; Naiara Calvo; Isabel Sancho; Francisco Diaz; Antonio Asso
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2017-10-12

10.  A case of premature ventricular contractions, ventricular tachycardia, and arrhythmic storm induced by right ventricular pacing during cardiac resynchronization therapy: Electrophysiological mechanism and catheter ablation.

Authors:  Stefano Pedretti; Sara Vargiu; Marco Paolucci; Maurizio Lunati
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2015-07-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.