Literature DB >> 25220899

Motoneuron regeneration accuracy and recovery of gait after femoral nerve injuries in rats.

M Kruspe1, H Thieme1, O Guntinas-Lichius1, A Irintchev2.   

Abstract

The rat femoral nerve is a valuable model allowing studies on specificity of motor axon regeneration. Despite common use of this model, the functional consequences of femoral nerve lesions and their relationship to precision of axonal regeneration have not been evaluated. Here we assessed gait recovery after femoral nerve injuries of varying severity in adult female Wistar rats using a video-based approach, single-frame motion analysis (SFMA). After nerve crush, recovery was complete at 4 weeks after injury (99% of maximum 100% as estimated by a recovery index). Functional restoration after nerve section/suture was much slower and incomplete (84%) even 20 weeks post-surgery. A 5-mm gap between the distal and proximal nerve stumps additionally delayed recovery and worsened the outcome (68% recovery). As assessed by retrograde labeling in the same rats at 20 weeks after injury, the anatomical outcome was also dependent on lesion severity. After nerve crush, 97% of the femoral motoneurons (MNs) had axons correctly projecting only into the distal quadriceps branch of the femoral nerve. The percentage of correctly projecting MNs was only 55% and 15% after nerve suture and gap repair, respectively. As indicated by regression analyses, better functional recovery was associated with higher numbers of correctly projecting MNs and, unexpectedly, lower numbers of MNs projecting to both muscle and skin. The data show that type of nerve injury and repair profoundly influence selectivity of motor reinnervation and, in parallel, functional outcome. The results also suggest that MNs' projection patterns may influence their contribution to muscle performance. In addition to the experiments described above, we performed repeated measurements and statistical analyses to validate the SFMA. The results revealed high accuracy and reproducibility of the SFMA measurements.
Copyright © 2014 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  behavioral test; peripheral nerve regeneration; preferential motor reinnervation; retrograde motoneuron labeling; single-frame motion analysis; structure–function correlations

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25220899     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.08.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  6 in total

Review 1.  Preclinical Evidence for the Role of Botulinum Neurotoxin A (BoNT/A) in the Treatment of Peripheral Nerve Injury.

Authors:  Michael Adler; Sabine Pellett; Shashi K Sharma; Frank J Lebeda; Zygmunt F Dembek; Mark A Mahan
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-04-24

2.  The lh3 Glycosyltransferase Directs Target-Selective Peripheral Nerve Regeneration.

Authors:  Jesse Isaacman-Beck; Valerie Schneider; Clara Franzini-Armstrong; Michael Granato
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Preserved limb function following subtotal iliopsoas muscle and femoral nerve resection in a dog with low grade intramuscular chondrosarcoma.

Authors:  Robert Slater; Michelle Oblak; Tanya Wright; Arata Matsuyama
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.008

4.  Neuroskeletal Effects of Chronic Bioelectric Nerve Stimulation in Health and Diabetes.

Authors:  Alec T Beeve; Ivana Shen; Xiao Zhang; Kristann Magee; Ying Yan; Matthew R MacEwan; Erica L Scheller
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Botulinum Neurotoxin Application to the Severed Femoral Nerve Modulates Spinal Synaptic Responses to Axotomy and Enhances Motor Recovery in Rats.

Authors:  Marcel Irintchev; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius; Andrey Irintchev
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.599

6.  The course of recovery of locomotor function over a 10-week observation period in a rat model of femoral nerve resection and autograft repair.

Authors:  Johannes Christoph Heinzel; David Hercher; Heinz Redl
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 2.708

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.