OBJECTIVE: To determine, at 6 weeks postsurgery, if a monitored home exercise program (HEP) is not inferior to usual care rehabilitation for patients undergoing primary unilateral total knee replacement (TKR) surgery for osteoarthritis. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Patients ages 45-75 years were allocated at the time of hospital discharge to usual care rehabilitation (n = 196) or the HEP (n = 194). Outcomes assessed 6 weeks after surgery included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain and physical function subscales, knee range of motion, and the 50-foot walk time. The upper bound of the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) mean difference favoring usual care was used to determine noninferiority. RESULTS: At 6 weeks after surgery there were no significant differences between usual care and HEP, respectively, for pain (7.4 and 7.2; 95% CI mean difference [MD] -0.7, 0.9), physical function (22.5 and 22.4; 95% CI MD -2.5, 2.6), knee flexion (96° and 97°; 95% CI MD -4°, 2°), knee extension (-7° and -6°; 95% CI MD -2°, 1°), or the 50-foot walk time (12.9 and 12.9 seconds; 95% CI MD -0.8, 0.7 seconds). At 6 weeks, 18 patients (9%) allocated to usual care and 11 (6%) to the HEP did not achieve 80° knee flexion. There was no difference between the treatment allocations in the number of hospital readmissions. CONCLUSION: The HEP was not inferior to usual care as an early rehabilitation protocol after primary TKR.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine, at 6 weeks postsurgery, if a monitored home exercise program (HEP) is not inferior to usual care rehabilitation for patients undergoing primary unilateral total knee replacement (TKR) surgery for osteoarthritis. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Patients ages 45-75 years were allocated at the time of hospital discharge to usual care rehabilitation (n = 196) or the HEP (n = 194). Outcomes assessed 6 weeks after surgery included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain and physical function subscales, knee range of motion, and the 50-foot walk time. The upper bound of the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) mean difference favoring usual care was used to determine noninferiority. RESULTS: At 6 weeks after surgery there were no significant differences between usual care and HEP, respectively, for pain (7.4 and 7.2; 95% CI mean difference [MD] -0.7, 0.9), physical function (22.5 and 22.4; 95% CI MD -2.5, 2.6), knee flexion (96° and 97°; 95% CI MD -4°, 2°), knee extension (-7° and -6°; 95% CI MD -2°, 1°), or the 50-foot walk time (12.9 and 12.9 seconds; 95% CI MD -0.8, 0.7 seconds). At 6 weeks, 18 patients (9%) allocated to usual care and 11 (6%) to the HEP did not achieve 80° knee flexion. There was no difference between the treatment allocations in the number of hospital readmissions. CONCLUSION: The HEP was not inferior to usual care as an early rehabilitation protocol after primary TKR.
Authors: Iciar M Dávila Castrodad; Thea M Recai; Megha M Abraham; Jennifer I Etcheson; Nequesha S Mohamed; Armin Edalatpour; Ronald E Delanois Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2019-10
Authors: Karen L Barker; Jon Room; Ruth Knight; Susan J Dutton; Fran Toye; Jose Leal; Seamus Kent; Nicola Kenealy; Michael M Schussel; Gary Collins; David J Beard; Andrew Price; Martin Underwood; Avril Drummond; Elaine Cook; Sarah E Lamb Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2020-11 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Hannah G Withers; Hueiming Liu; Joanne V Glinsky; Jackie Chu; Matthew D Jennings; Alison J Hayes; Ian J Starkey; Blake A Palmer; Lukas Szymanek; Jackson J Cruwys; David Wong; Kitty Duong; Anne Barnett; Matthew J Tindall; Barbara R Lucas; Tara E Lambert; Deborah A Taylor; Catherine Sherrington; Manuela L Ferreira; Christopher G Maher; Joshua R Zadro; Lisa A Harvey Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-07-05 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Daniel K White; Zhichang Li; Yuqing Zhang; Adam R Marmon; Hiral Master; Joseph Zeni; Jingbo Niu; Long Jiang; Shu Zhang; Jianhao Lin Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2017-07-29 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Hannah G Withers; Joanne V Glinsky; Jackie Chu; Matthew D Jennings; Alison J Hayes; Ian J Starkey; Blake A Palmer; Lukas Szymanek; Jackson J Cruwys; David Wong; Kitty Duong; Anne Barnett; Matthew J Tindall; Barbara R Lucas; Tara E Lambert; Catherine Sherrington; Christopher G Maher; Manuela L Ferreira; Deborah A Taylor; Lisa A Harvey Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-05-18 Impact factor: 2.692