BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the potency and molecular mechanism of action of YM155, a first-in-class survivin inhibitor that is currently under phase I/II clinical investigations, in various drug-resistant breast cancers including the oestrogen receptor positive (ER(+) ) tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer and the caspase-3-deficient breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The potency of YM155 in SK-BR-3, MDA-MB-231, MCF7 and its tamoxifen-resistant sublines, TamR6, TamR7, TamR8, TamC3 and TamC6, were determined by MTT assay. Western blot analysis, flow cytometric analysis, reverse transcription-PCR, fluorescent microscopy and comet assay were used to determine the molecular mechanism of action of YM155 in different breast cancer cell lines. KEY RESULTS: YM155 was equally potent towards the parental ER(+) /caspase-3-deficient MCF7 breast cancer cells and its tamoxifen-resistant sublines in vitro. The ER(-) /HER2(+) SK-BR-3 breast cancer cells and the triple-negative/caspase-3-expressing metastatic aggressive MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells were also sensitive to YM155 with IC50 values in the low nanomolar range. Targeting survivin by YM155 modulated autophagy, induced autophagy-dependent caspase-7 activation and autophagy-dependent DNA damage in breast cancer cells. Interestingly, YM155 also induced XIAP degradation and the degradation of XIAP might play an important role in YM155-induced autophagy in breast cancer cells. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: YM155 is a potent survivin inhibitor that has potential for the management of various breast cancer subtypes regardless of the expression of ER, HER2 and caspase-3. Importantly, this study provides new insights into YM155's molecular mechanism of action and therapeutic potential in the treatment of tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the potency and molecular mechanism of action of YM155, a first-in-class survivin inhibitor that is currently under phase I/II clinical investigations, in various drug-resistant breast cancers including the oestrogen receptor positive (ER(+) ) tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer and the caspase-3-deficient breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The potency of YM155 in SK-BR-3, MDA-MB-231, MCF7 and its tamoxifen-resistant sublines, TamR6, TamR7, TamR8, TamC3 and TamC6, were determined by MTT assay. Western blot analysis, flow cytometric analysis, reverse transcription-PCR, fluorescent microscopy and comet assay were used to determine the molecular mechanism of action of YM155 in different breast cancer cell lines. KEY RESULTS: YM155 was equally potent towards the parental ER(+) /caspase-3-deficient MCF7 breast cancer cells and its tamoxifen-resistant sublines in vitro. The ER(-) /HER2(+) SK-BR-3 breast cancer cells and the triple-negative/caspase-3-expressing metastatic aggressive MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells were also sensitive to YM155 with IC50 values in the low nanomolar range. Targeting survivin by YM155 modulated autophagy, induced autophagy-dependent caspase-7 activation and autophagy-dependent DNA damage in breast cancer cells. Interestingly, YM155 also induced XIAP degradation and the degradation of XIAP might play an important role in YM155-induced autophagy in breast cancer cells. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: YM155 is a potent survivin inhibitor that has potential for the management of various breast cancer subtypes regardless of the expression of ER, HER2 and caspase-3. Importantly, this study provides new insights into YM155's molecular mechanism of action and therapeutic potential in the treatment of tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer.
Authors: W H Yu; A Kumar; C Peterhoff; L Shapiro Kulnane; Y Uchiyama; B T Lamb; A M Cuervo; R A Nixon Journal: Int J Biochem Cell Biol Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 5.085
Authors: T Iwasa; I Okamoto; K Takezawa; K Yamanaka; T Nakahara; A Kita; H Koutoku; M Sasamata; E Hatashita; Y Yamada; K Kuwata; M Fukuoka; K Nakagawa Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-06-01 Impact factor: 9.075
Authors: Gozde Korkmaz; Kumsal Ayse Tekirdag; Deniz Gulfem Ozturk; Ali Kosar; Osman Ugur Sezerman; Devrim Gozuacik Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-12-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: G Renner; H Janouskova; F Noulet; V Koenig; E Guerin; S Bär; J Nuesch; F Rechenmacher; S Neubauer; H Kessler; A-F Blandin; L Choulier; N Etienne-Selloum; M Lehmann; I Lelong-Rebel; S Martin; M Dontenwill Journal: Cell Death Differ Date: 2015-10-16 Impact factor: 15.828
Authors: Vikram B Wali; Casey G Langdon; Matthew A Held; James T Platt; Gauri A Patwardhan; Anton Safonov; Bilge Aktas; Lajos Pusztai; David F Stern; Christos Hatzis Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2016-11-21 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Eduardo J Salustiano; Matheus L Dumas; Gabriel G Silva-Santos; Chaquip D Netto; Paulo R R Costa; Vivian M Rumjanek Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2016-05-18 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Amit Mehta; Lisa Zhang; Myriem Boufraqech; Yi Liu-Chittenden; Yaqin Zhang; Dhaval Patel; Sean Davis; Avi Rosenberg; Kris Ylaya; Rachel Aufforth; Zhuyin Li; Min Shen; Electron Kebebew Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-05-05 Impact factor: 13.801
Authors: Esther P Jane; Daniel R Premkumar; Philip A Sutera; Jonathon M Cavaleri; Ian F Pollack Journal: Mol Carcinog Date: 2016-11-22 Impact factor: 5.139