Literature DB >> 25220181

Joined at the hip: kinetochores, microtubules, and spindle assembly checkpoint signaling.

Carlos Sacristan1, Geert J P L Kops2.   

Abstract

Error-free chromosome segregation relies on stable connections between kinetochores and spindle microtubules. The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) monitors such connections and relays their absence to the cell cycle machinery to delay cell division. The molecular network at kinetochores that is responsible for microtubule binding is integrated with the core components of the SAC signaling system. Molecular-mechanistic understanding of how the SAC is coupled to the kinetochore-microtubule interface has advanced significantly in recent years. The latest insights not only provide a striking view of the dynamics and regulation of SAC signaling events at the outer kinetochore but also create a framework for understanding how that signaling may be terminated when kinetochores and microtubules connect.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  aneuploidy; checkpoint; kinetochore; microtubule; spindle

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25220181     DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2014.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cell Biol        ISSN: 0962-8924            Impact factor:   20.808


  77 in total

Review 1.  How the SAC gets the axe: Integrating kinetochore microtubule attachments with spindle assembly checkpoint signaling.

Authors:  Shivangi Agarwal; Dileep Varma
Journal:  Bioarchitecture       Date:  2015-10-02

Review 2.  Ubiquitin, the centrosome, and chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Paul J Galardy
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Mad1 promotes chromosome congression by anchoring a kinesin motor to the kinetochore.

Authors:  Takashi Akera; Yuhei Goto; Masamitsu Sato; Masayuki Yamamoto; Yoshinori Watanabe
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 4.  The spindle assembly checkpoint promotes chromosome bi-orientation: A novel Mad1 role in chromosome alignment.

Authors:  Takashi Akera; Yoshinori Watanabe
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 5.  Connecting the microtubule attachment status of each kinetochore to cell cycle arrest through the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  P Todd Stukenberg; Daniel J Burke
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 6.  Where is the right path heading from the centromere to spindle microtubules?

Authors:  Masatoshi Hara; Tatsuo Fukagawa
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 4.534

7.  PP2A-B56γ is required for an efficient spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  Prajakta Varadkar; Fatima Abbasi; Kazuyo Takeda; Jade J Dyson; Brent McCright
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  Conformation-specific anti-Mad2 monoclonal antibodies for the dissection of checkpoint signaling.

Authors:  Garry G Sedgwick; Marie Sofie Yoo Larsen; Tiziana Lischetti; Werner Streicher; Rosa Rakownikow Jersie-Christensen; Jesper V Olsen; Jakob Nilsson
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 5.857

9.  Inositol Pyrophosphate Kinase Asp1 Modulates Chromosome Segregation Fidelity and Spindle Function in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

Authors:  Boris Topolski; Visnja Jakopec; Natascha A Künzel; Ursula Fleig
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 10.  How oocytes try to get it right: spindle checkpoint control in meiosis.

Authors:  Sandra A Touati; Katja Wassmann
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 4.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.