Joyce F Liu1, William T Barry2, Michael Birrer3, Jung-Min Lee4, Ronald J Buckanovich5, Gini F Fleming6, Bj Rimel7, Mary K Buss8, Sreenivasa Nattam9, Jean Hurteau10, Weixiu Luo2, Philippa Quy11, Christin Whalen11, Lisa Obermayer11, Hang Lee12, Eric P Winer11, Elise C Kohn13, S Percy Ivy14, Ursula A Matulonis11. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: joyce_liu@dfci.harvard.edu. 2. Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Women's Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. 5. Department of Medical Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 6. Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 8. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Beth-Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. 9. Department of Oncology, Fort Wayne Medical Oncology and Hematology, Fort Wayne, IN, USA. 10. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, North Shore University Health System, Evanston Hospital, Evanston, IL, USA. 11. Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. 12. Department of Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 13. Women's Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA; Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. 14. Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Olaparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor and cediranib is an anti-angiogenic agent with activity against VEGF receptor (VEGFR) 1, VEGFR2, and VEGFR3. Both oral agents have antitumour activity in women with recurrent ovarian cancer, and their combination was active and had manageable toxicities in a phase 1 trial. We investigated whether this combination could improve progression-free survival (PFS) compared with olaparib monotherapy in women with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. METHODS: In our randomised, open-label, phase 2 study, we recruited women (aged ≥18 years) who had measurable platinum-sensitive, relapsed, high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer, or those with deleterious germline BRCA1/2 mutations from nine participating US academic medical centres. We randomly allocated participants (1:1) according to permuted blocks, stratified by germline BRCA status and previous anti-angiogenic therapy, to receive olaparib capsules 400 mg twice daily or the combination at the recommended phase 2 dose of cediranib 30 mg daily and olaparib capsules 200 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival analysed in the intention-to-treat population. The phase 2 trial is no longer accruing patients. An interim analysis was conducted in November, 2013, after 50% of expected events had occurred and efficacy results were unmasked. The primary analysis was performed on March 31, 2014, after 47 events (66% of those expected). The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01116648. FINDINGS: Between Oct 26, 2011, and June 3, 2013, we randomly allocated 46 women to receive olaparib alone and 44 to receive the combination of olaparib and cediranib. Median PFS was 17·7 months (95% CI 14·7-not reached) for the women treated with cediranib plus olaparib compared with 9·0 months (95% CI 5·7-16·5) for those treated with olaparib monotherapy (hazard ratio 0·42, 95% CI 0·23-0·76; p=0·005). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events were more common with combination therapy than with monotherapy, including fatigue (12 patients in the cediranib plus olaparib group vs five patients in the olaparib monotherapy group), diarrhoea (ten vs none), and hypertension (18 vs none). INTERPRETATION:Cediranib plus olaparib seems to improve PFS in women with recurrent platinum-sensitive high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian cancer, and warrants study in a phase 3 trial. The side-effect profile suggests such investigations should include assessments of quality of life and patient-reported outcomes to understand the effects of a continuing oral regimen with that of intermittent chemotherapy. FUNDING: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (3 U01 CA062490-16S2); Intramural Program of the Center for Cancer Research; and the Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, NIH.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Olaparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor and cediranib is an anti-angiogenic agent with activity against VEGF receptor (VEGFR) 1, VEGFR2, and VEGFR3. Both oral agents have antitumour activity in women with recurrent ovarian cancer, and their combination was active and had manageable toxicities in a phase 1 trial. We investigated whether this combination could improve progression-free survival (PFS) compared with olaparib monotherapy in women with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. METHODS: In our randomised, open-label, phase 2 study, we recruited women (aged ≥18 years) who had measurable platinum-sensitive, relapsed, high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer, or those with deleterious germline BRCA1/2 mutations from nine participating US academic medical centres. We randomly allocated participants (1:1) according to permuted blocks, stratified by germline BRCA status and previous anti-angiogenic therapy, to receive olaparib capsules 400 mg twice daily or the combination at the recommended phase 2 dose of cediranib 30 mg daily and olaparib capsules 200 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival analysed in the intention-to-treat population. The phase 2 trial is no longer accruing patients. An interim analysis was conducted in November, 2013, after 50% of expected events had occurred and efficacy results were unmasked. The primary analysis was performed on March 31, 2014, after 47 events (66% of those expected). The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01116648. FINDINGS: Between Oct 26, 2011, and June 3, 2013, we randomly allocated 46 women to receive olaparib alone and 44 to receive the combination of olaparib and cediranib. Median PFS was 17·7 months (95% CI 14·7-not reached) for the women treated with cediranib plus olaparib compared with 9·0 months (95% CI 5·7-16·5) for those treated with olaparib monotherapy (hazard ratio 0·42, 95% CI 0·23-0·76; p=0·005). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events were more common with combination therapy than with monotherapy, including fatigue (12 patients in the cediranib plus olaparib group vs five patients in the olaparib monotherapy group), diarrhoea (ten vs none), and hypertension (18 vs none). INTERPRETATION:Cediranib plus olaparib seems to improve PFS in women with recurrent platinum-sensitive high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian cancer, and warrants study in a phase 3 trial. The side-effect profile suggests such investigations should include assessments of quality of life and patient-reported outcomes to understand the effects of a continuing oral regimen with that of intermittent chemotherapy. FUNDING: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (3 U01 CA062490-16S2); Intramural Program of the Center for Cancer Research; and the Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, NIH.
Authors: Ranjit S Bindra; Shannon L Gibson; Alice Meng; Ulrica Westermark; Maria Jasin; Andrew J Pierce; Robert G Bristow; Marie K Classon; Peter M Glazer Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2005-12-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Stephen A Cannistra; Ursula A Matulonis; Richard T Penson; Julie Hambleton; Jakob Dupont; Howard Mackey; Jeffrey Douglas; Robert A Burger; Deborah Armstrong; Robert Wenham; William McGuire Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-11-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Robert A Burger; Michael W Sill; Bradley J Monk; Benjamin E Greer; Joel I Sorosky Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-11-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ursula A Matulonis; Suzanne Berlin; Percy Ivy; Karin Tyburski; Carolyn Krasner; Corrine Zarwan; Anna Berkenblit; Susana Campos; Neil Horowitz; Stephen A Cannistra; Hang Lee; Julie Lee; Maria Roche; Margaret Hill; Christin Whalen; Laura Sullivan; Chau Tran; Benjamin D Humphreys; Richard T Penson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-10-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Peter C Fong; Timothy A Yap; David S Boss; Craig P Carden; Marja Mergui-Roelvink; Charlie Gourley; Jacques De Greve; Jan Lubinski; Susan Shanley; Christina Messiou; Roger A'Hern; Andrew Tutt; Alan Ashworth; John Stone; James Carmichael; Jan H M Schellens; Johann S de Bono; Stan B Kaye Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-04-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Helen E Bryant; Niklas Schultz; Huw D Thomas; Kayan M Parker; Dan Flower; Elena Lopez; Suzanne Kyle; Mark Meuth; Nicola J Curtin; Thomas Helleday Journal: Nature Date: 2005-04-14 Impact factor: 69.504
Authors: Peter C Fong; David S Boss; Timothy A Yap; Andrew Tutt; Peijun Wu; Marja Mergui-Roelvink; Peter Mortimer; Helen Swaisland; Alan Lau; Mark J O'Connor; Alan Ashworth; James Carmichael; Stan B Kaye; Jan H M Schellens; Johann S de Bono Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-06-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Hannah Farmer; Nuala McCabe; Christopher J Lord; Andrew N J Tutt; Damian A Johnson; Tobias B Richardson; Manuela Santarosa; Krystyna J Dillon; Ian Hickson; Charlotte Knights; Niall M B Martin; Stephen P Jackson; Graeme C M Smith; Alan Ashworth Journal: Nature Date: 2005-04-14 Impact factor: 69.504
Authors: Don S Dizon; Lada Krilov; Ezra Cohen; Tara Gangadhar; Patricia A Ganz; Thomas A Hensing; Stephen Hunger; Smitha S Krishnamurthi; Andrew B Lassman; Merry Jennifer Markham; Erica Mayer; Michael Neuss; Sumanta Kumar Pal; Lisa C Richardson; Richard Schilsky; Gary K Schwartz; David R Spriggs; Miguel Angel Villalona-Calero; Gina Villani; Gregory Masters Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-02-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sarah J Hill; Brennan Decker; Emma A Roberts; Neil S Horowitz; Michael G Muto; Michael J Worley; Colleen M Feltmate; Marisa R Nucci; Elizabeth M Swisher; Huy Nguyen; Chunyu Yang; Ryuji Morizane; Bose S Kochupurakkal; Khanh T Do; Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos; Joyce F Liu; Joseph V Bonventre; Ursula A Matulonis; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Ross S Berkowitz; Christopher P Crum; Alan D D'Andrea Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2018-09-13 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Jung-Min Lee; Cody J Peer; Minshu Yu; Lauren Amable; Nicolas Gordon; Christina M Annunziata; Nicole Houston; Andrew K L Goey; Tristan M Sissung; Bernard Parker; Lori Minasian; Victoria L Chiou; Robert F Murphy; Brigitte C Widemann; William D Figg; Elise C Kohn Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-09-23 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Chaoyang Sun; Yong Fang; Jun Yin; Jian Chen; Zhenlin Ju; Dong Zhang; Xiaohua Chen; Christopher P Vellano; Kang Jin Jeong; Patrick Kwok-Shing Ng; Agda Karina B Eterovic; Neil H Bhola; Yiling Lu; Shannon N Westin; Jennifer R Grandis; Shiaw-Yih Lin; Kenneth L Scott; Guang Peng; Joan Brugge; Gordon B Mills Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2017-05-31 Impact factor: 17.956