Literature DB >> 25218596

EndoPredict predicts for the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.

François Bertucci1, Pascal Finetti2, Patrice Viens3, Daniel Birnbaum2.   

Abstract

The EndoPredict (EP) signature is a prognostic 11-gene expression signature specifically developed in ER+/HER2- node-negative/positive breast cancer. It is associated with relapse-free survival in patients treated with adjuvant hormone therapy, suggesting that EP low-risk patients could be treated with adjuvant hormone therapy alone whereas high-risk patients would deserve addition of adjuvant chemotherapy. Thus, it is important to determine whether EP high-risk patients are or are not more sensitive to chemotherapy than low-risk patients. Here, we have assessed the EP predictive value for pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER+/HER2- breast cancer. We gathered gene expression and histoclinical data of 553 pre-treatment ER+/HER2- breast carcinomas treated with anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We searched for correlation between the pathological complete response (pCR) and the EP score-based classification. The overall pCR rate was 12%. Fifty-one percent of samples were classified as low-risk according to the EP score and 49% as high-risk. EP classification was associated with a pCR rate of 7% in the low-risk group and 17% in the high-risk group (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, the EP score remained significantly associated with pCR. Many genes upregulated in the high-risk tumours were involved in cell proliferation, whereas many genes upregulated in the low-risk tumours were involved in ER-signalling and stroma. Despite higher chemosensitivity, the high-risk group was associated with worse disease-free survival. In conclusion, EP high-risk ER+/HER2- breast cancers are more likely to respond to anthracycline-based chemotherapy.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; EndoPredict; Neoadjuvant; Response to chemotherapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25218596     DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Lett        ISSN: 0304-3835            Impact factor:   8.679


  20 in total

1.  PDL1 expression is a poor-prognosis factor in soft-tissue sarcomas.

Authors:  François Bertucci; Pascal Finetti; Delphine Perrot; Agnès Leroux; Françoise Collin; Axel Le Cesne; Jean-Michel Coindre; Jean-Yves Blay; Daniel Birnbaum; Emilie Mamessier
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 8.110

2.  PDL1 expression is an independent prognostic factor in localized GIST.

Authors:  François Bertucci; Pascal Finetti; Emilie Mamessier; Maria Abbondanza Pantaleo; Annalisa Astolfi; Jerzy Ostrowski; Daniel Birnbaum
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 8.110

3.  Cyclin A2 maintains colon homeostasis and is a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yuchen Guo; Monica Gabola; Rossano Lattanzio; Conception Paul; Valérie Pinet; Ruizhi Tang; Hulya Turali; Julie Bremond; Ciro Longobardi; Chloé Maurizy; Quentin Da Costa; Pascal Finetti; Florence Boissière-Michot; Benjamin Rivière; Céline Lemmers; Séverine Garnier; François Bertucci; Inti Zlobec; Karim Chebli; Jamal Tazi; Rania Azar; Jean-Marie Blanchard; Peter Sicinski; Emilie Mamessier; Bénédicte Lemmers; Michael Hahne
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 4.  Advancement of prognostic models in breast cancer: a narrative review.

Authors:  Ningning Min; Yufan Wei; Yiqiong Zheng; Xiru Li
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-09

5.  The E2F4 prognostic signature is also predictive of the pathological response of breast cancer to chemotherapy.

Authors:  François Bertucci; Pascal Finetti; Daniel Birnbaum
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 6.466

6.  Outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Asian breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Li Yan Lim; Hui Miao; Joline S J Lim; Soo Chin Lee; Nirmala Bhoo-Pathy; Cheng Har Yip; Nur Aishah B M Taib; Patrick Chan; Ern Yu Tan; Swee Ho Lim; Geok Hoon Lim; Evan Woo; Yia Swam Tan; Jung Ah Lee; Mabel Wong; Puay Hoon Tan; Kong Wee Ong; Fuh Yong Wong; Yoon Sim Yap; Mikael Hartman
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 4.452

7.  Relationship between IHC4 score and response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  A Sheri; I E Smith; M Hills; R L Jones; S R Johnston; M Dowsett
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 8.  The Potential Use of Tumour-Based Prognostic and Predictive Tools in Older Women with Primary Breast Cancer: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Sophie Gordon-Craig; Ruth M Parks; Kwok-Leung Cheung
Journal:  Oncol Ther       Date:  2020-07-17

9.  A two-gene epigenetic signature for the prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Begoña Pineda; Angel Diaz-Lagares; José Alejandro Pérez-Fidalgo; Octavio Burgués; Inés González-Barrallo; Ana B Crujeiras; Juan Sandoval; Manel Esteller; Ana Lluch; Pilar Eroles
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 6.551

10.  The immunologic constant of rejection classification refines the prognostic value of conventional prognostic signatures in breast cancer.

Authors:  François Bertucci; Pascal Finetti; Ines Simeone; Wouter Hendrickx; Ena Wang; Francesco M Marincola; Patrice Viens; Emilie Mamessier; Michele Ceccarelli; Daniel Birnbaum; Davide Bedognetti
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.