Literature DB >> 25218551

Comparison of maternal outcomes from primary cesarean section during the second compared with first stage of labor by indication for the operation.

Samuel Lurie1, Nili Raz2, Mona Boaz3, Oscar Sadan4, Abraham Golan4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal outcomes when cesarean sections were performed in the second stage of labor to those performed in the first stage of labor by indication for the operation. STUDY
DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort (n=383) of term parturient women who underwent primary cesarean section during active labor. Cases were drawn from the Obstetrics Department, E. Wolfson Medical Center, a tertiary health care university facility, during a 24 month period. All cases were term singleton pregnancies in vertex presentation following unremarkable pregnancy. Maternal morbidity was assessed.
RESULTS: A significantly higher rate of unintentional uterine incision extensions was observed in cesarean sections performed during second stage compared to first stage (17.1% vs. 4.6%, p=0.001). It was higher whenever (at first or second stage) the fetal head was pushed (20.0% vs. 5.4%, p=0.0024). Unintentional uterine incision extensions were significantly more frequent when the cesarean section was performed for non-progressive labor during the second stage compared to first stage (16.1% vs. 3.6%, p=0.0052). Uterine atonia was more frequent among parturient women who underwent cesarean section for non-progressive labor during the first stage compared to second stage (16.7% vs. 4.8%, p=0.0382).
CONCLUSION: Uterine atony during first stage cesarean section and unintentional uterine incision extensions during second stage cesarean section were significantly more frequent when the operation was performed for non-progressive labor.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean section; Labor; Maternal morbidity; Stages of labor

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25218551     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.08.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  6 in total

1.  The morbidly adherent placenta: when and what association of signs can improve MRI diagnosis? Our experience.

Authors:  Anna Lia Valentini; Benedetta Gui; Valeria Ninivaggi; Maura Miccò; Michela Giuliani; Luca Russo; Maria Giulia Marini; Mauro Tintoni; Anna Franca Cavaliere; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.630

2.  Obesity, Second Stage Duration, and Labor Outcomes in Nulliparous Women.

Authors:  Antonina I Frolova; Nandini Raghuraman; Molly J Stout; Methodius G Tuuli; George A Macones; Alison G Cahill
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2019-09-28       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Which Foetal-Pelvic Variables Are Useful for Predicting Caesarean Section and Instrumental Assistance?

Authors:  P Frémondière; L Thollon; P Adalian; J Delotte; F Marchal
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 1.927

4.  Cesarean in the second stage: a possible risk factor for subsequent spontaneous preterm birth.

Authors:  Vincenzo Berghella; Alexis C Gimovsky; Lisa D Levine; Joy Vink
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Complete cervical inversion and nearly inappropriate stitching with cesarean section during the second stage of labor: a case report.

Authors:  Jun Zhan; Aiyun Xing; Xi Tan
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.671

6.  Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population-based ecological study with longitudinal data.

Authors:  J Ye; J Zhang; R Mikolajczyk; M R Torloni; A M Gülmezoglu; A P Betran
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 6.531

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.