| Literature DB >> 25218419 |
Fabiana S Jerônimo1, Giovanni N Alves2, Gerson Cipriano3, Paulo J C Vieira4, Adriana M Güntzel Chiappa4, Gaspar R Chiappa5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: the impact of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) on lung function is well known and associated with a reduction in pulmonary ventilation. Moreover, the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy has been associated with mitochondrial dysfunction and decreased muscle strength. However, there is scarce information about the factors associated with inspiratory muscle weakness in these patients.Entities:
Keywords: Diaphragm muscle; Exercise tolerance, highly active antiretroviral therapy; Inflammatory response; Inspiratory muscle; Lung function
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25218419 PMCID: PMC9425230 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjid.2014.07.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Infect Dis ISSN: 1413-8670 Impact factor: 3.257
Fig. 1The CONSORT-flow diagram of patients in the study.
Characteristics of participants.
| Characteristics | All patients ( | IMW+ ( | IMW− ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 45 ± 11 | 46.5 ± 11 | 49.2 ± 10 | 0.24 |
| Sex (male/female) | 53/18 | 35/10 | 18/8 | 0.77 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23 ± 3 | 23 ± 4 | 25 ± 4 | 0.42 |
| Fasting Glucose (mg/dL) | 99 ± 22 | 91 ± 25 | 86 ± 16 | 0.12 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 180 ± 40 | 176 ± 42 | 189 ± 37 | 0.23 |
| HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) | 43 ± 13 | 46 ± 14 | 39 ± 9 | 0.11 |
| LDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) | 110 ± 45 | 105 ± 34 | 118 ± 37 | 0.29 |
| MBP (mm Hg) | 90 ± 16 | 98 ± 12 | 90 ± 18 | 0.35 |
| HR (beats min−1) | 77 ± 7 | 88 ± 8 | 76 ± 10 | 0.74 |
| 122 ± 18 | 104 ± 12 | 111 ± 21 | 0.34 | |
| 56 ± 27 | 81 ± 12 | 38 ± 13 | 0.01 | |
| CD4 count (cells/mm3) | 536 ± 72 | 327 ± 88 | 637 ± 97 | 0.02 |
| CD8 count (cells/mm3) | 1098 ± 444 | 1086 ± 480 | 1124 ± 358 | 0.25 |
| CD4/CD8 ratio | 0.48 ± 0.18 | 0.31 ± 0.04 | 0.56 ± 0.09 | 0.01 |
| CD4 nadir (cells/mm3) | ||||
| Median (interquartile range) | 245 (140–368) | 90 (19–144) | 270 (159–354) | 0.03 |
| Viral load (log) | 2.1 (1.7–3.5) | 2.5 (1.8–3.6) | 2.1 (1.5–3.4) | 0.55 |
| Viral load (≤50 cells/mm3; %) | 71 | 67 | 92 | 0.04 |
| FEV1 (L) | 3.02 ± 0.45 | 2.66 ± 0.46 | 2.88 ± 0.67 | 0.02 |
| FEV1 (% of predicted) | 95 ± 10 | 85 ± 6 | 93 ± 8 | 0.03 |
| FVC (% of predicted) | 101 ± 12 | 92 ± 13 | 102 ± 9 | 0.03 |
| FEV1/FVC | 94 ± 5 | 92 ± 8 | 91 ± 9 | 0.67 |
| MIP (cm H2O) | 80 ± 12 | 45 ± 12 | 90 ± 17 | 0.01 |
| MIP (% predicted) | 77 ± 11 | 46 ± 14 | 89 ± 12 | 0.01 |
| 6MWD (m) | 445 ± 65 | 265 ± 38 | 452 ± 67 | 0.01 |
| 6MWD (% of predicted) | 95 ± 22 | 45 ± 18 | 91 ± 12 | 0.01 |
Continuous variables expressed as mean ± standard deviation; categorical variables expressed using chi-square or Fisher's exact test.
BMI, body mass index; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; MBP, mean blood pressure; HR, heart rate; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1st min; FVC, forced vital capacity; FEV1/FVC, forced expiratory volume in 1st min to forced vital capacity ratio; MIP, maximal inspiratory pressure; 6MWD, distance traveled on six-minute walk test; HAART, highly active antiretroviral therapy.
Significant difference in comparison to other two groups.
Significant difference in comparison to IMW− (p < 0.05).
cChi-square test.
Fig. 2Scattergram of the association between maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) and CD4 count (cells/mm3) for all subjects. Open circles represent patients without inspiratory muscle weakness. Filled circles represent patients with inspiratory muscle weakness. r = Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Results of stepwise multiple regression analysis of maximum inspiratory pressure.
| Dependent variable | Independent variable | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 6MWD | HAART duration | −0.62 | 0.68 |
| MIP | 0.66 | ||
| CD4 count | 0.78 |
MIP, maximum inspiratory pressure; HAART duration, duration of highly active antiretroviral therapy; 6MWD, distance on six-minute walk test; β, standardized partial regression coefficient; r, multiple correlation coefficient.
p < 0.001.
Comparative assessment of pulmonary function, inspiratory muscle strength and distance walked in different groups according to CD4 count.
| IMW+ | IMW− | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD4 <200 ( | CD4 >200 ( | CD4 <200 ( | CD4 >200 ( | |
| 1.88 ± 0.66 | 2.58 ± 0.45 | 2.88 ± 0.49 | 3.01 ± 0.56 | |
| 83 ± 5 | 90 ± 8 | 95 ± 12 | 96 ± 9 | |
| 95 ± 12 | 95 ± 7 | 98 ± 8 | 102 ± 12 | |
| 88 ± 6 | 94 ± 5 | 96 ± 5 | 94 ± 8 | |
| 45 ± 12 | 68 ± 15 | 80 ± 13 | 97 ± 20 | |
| 46 ± 14 | 69 ± 12 | 82 ± 18 | 98 ± 19 | |
| 265 ± 38 | 301 ± 44 | 349 ± 49 | 452 ± 67 | |
| 45 ± 18 | 52 ± 14 | 81 ± 27 | 95 ± 29 | |
| ≤50 | 41 | 69 | 60 | 83 |
Data expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
IM, inspiratory muscle weakness; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1st min; FVC, forced vital capacity; FEV1/FVC, forced expiratory volume in 1st min to forced vital capacity ratio; MIP, maximal inspiratory pressure; 6MWD, distance traveled on six-minute walk test.
Significant difference in overall comparison (p < 0.001).
Comparison of CD4 below 200 cells/mm3 in IMW+ and IMW− (p < 0.01).
Comparison between CD4 above versus below 200 cells/mm3 in IMW− (p < 0.01).