Literature DB >> 25218277

Considering effects of nanosecond pulsed electric fields on proteins.

Stephen J Beebe1.   

Abstract

Most, if not all, effects of intense, pulsed electric fields are analyzed in terms of electrical charging of plasma membranes and/or subcellular membranes. However, not all cell responses from nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs) are fully explained by poration of cell membranes. Observations that nsPEFs induce a Ca2-dependent dissipation of the mitochondria membrane potential (ΔΨm), which is enhanced when high frequency components are present in fast rise-fall waveforms, are not compatible with a poration event. Ca(2+) is shown to have little or no effect on propidium iodide uptake as a measure of plasma membrane poration and consequently intracellular membranes. Since most if not all Ca(2+)-regulated events are mediated by proteins, actions of nsPEFs on a protein(s) that regulate and/or affect the mitochondria membrane potential are possible. To show that nsPEFs can directly affect proteins, nsPEFs non-thermally inactivated the catalytic (phosphotransferase) activity of the catalytic subunit of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase, which is the prototype of the protein kinase superfamily that share a common catalytic mechanism and whose functions are highly dependent on their structure. These studies present indirect and direct evidences that nsPEFs can affect proteins and their functions, at least in part, by affecting their structure.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Calcium; Electric fields; Mitochondria membrane potential; Molecular dynamics; cAMP-dependent protein kinase

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25218277     DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2014.08.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry        ISSN: 1567-5394            Impact factor:   5.373


  11 in total

1.  Induction of apoptosis of liver cancer cells by nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs).

Authors:  Ling He; Deyou Xiao; Jianguo Feng; Chenguo Yao; Liling Tang
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) and vaccines: a novel technique for the inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 and other viruses?

Authors:  A R Ruiz-Fernández; M Rosemblatt; T Perez-Acle
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 5.348

3.  Monopole patch antenna for in vivo exposure to nanosecond pulsed electric fields.

Authors:  C Merla; F Apollonio; A Paffi; C Marino; P T Vernier; M Liberti
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Modification of Pulsed Electric Field Conditions Results in Distinct Activation Profiles of Platelet-Rich Plasma.

Authors:  Andrew L Frelinger; Anja J Gerrits; Allen L Garner; Andrew S Torres; Antonio Caiafa; Christine A Morton; Michelle A Berny-Lang; Sabrina L Carmichael; V Bogdan Neculaes; Alan D Michelson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Inactivation of Ricin Toxin by Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields Including Evidences from Cell and Animal Toxicity.

Authors:  Kai Wei; Wei Li; Shan Gao; Bin Ji; Yating Zang; Bo Su; Kaile Wang; Maosheng Yao; Jue Zhang; Jinglin Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Tubulin response to intense nanosecond-scale electric field in molecular dynamics simulation.

Authors:  Paolo Marracino; Daniel Havelka; Jiří Průša; Micaela Liberti; Jack Tuszynski; Ahmed T Ayoub; Francesca Apollonio; Michal Cifra
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Nanosecond pulsed electric signals can affect electrostatic environment of proteins below the threshold of conformational effects: The case study of SOD1 with a molecular simulation study.

Authors:  Elena Della Valle; Paolo Marracino; Olga Pakhomova; Micaela Liberti; Francesca Apollonio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effects of Low Frequency-Low Voltage Alternating Electric Current on Apoptosis Progression in Bioelectrical Reactor Biofilm.

Authors:  Edris Hoseinzadeh; Chiang Wei; Mahdi Farzadkia; Abbas Rezaee
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-01-22

9.  Evaluation of the Genetic Response of U937 and Jurkat Cells to 10-Nanosecond Electrical Pulses (nsEP).

Authors:  Caleb C Roth; Randolph D Glickman; Gleb P Tolstykh; Larry E Estlack; Erick K Moen; Ibtissam Echchgadda; Hope T Beier; Ronald A Barnes; Bennett L Ibey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Nanopulse Stimulation (NPS) Induces Tumor Ablation and Immunity in Orthotopic 4T1 Mouse Breast Cancer: A Review.

Authors:  Stephen J Beebe; Brittany P Lassiter; Siqi Guo
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.