Literature DB >> 25218214

Feasibility of neuromuscular electrical stimulation immediately after cardiovascular surgery.

Kotaro Iwatsu1, Sumio Yamada2, Yuki Iida3, Hideyuki Sampei1, Kiyonori Kobayashi4, Motoshi Kainuma5, Akihiko Usui6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and feasibility of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) from postoperative days (PODs) 1 to 5 after cardiovascular surgery.
DESIGN: Pre-post interventional study.
SETTING: Surgical intensive care unit and thoracic surgical ward of a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients (N=144) who underwent cardiovascular surgery were included. Patients with peripheral arterial disease, psychiatric disease, neuromuscular disease, and dementia were excluded. Patients with severe chronic renal failure and those who required prolonged mechanical ventilation after surgery were also excluded because of the possibility of affecting the outcome of a future controlled study.
INTERVENTIONS: NMES to the lower extremities was implemented from PODs 1 to 5. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility outcomes included compliance, the number of the patients who had changes in systolic blood pressure (BP) >20 mmHg or an increase in heart rate >20 beats/min during NMES, and the incidence of temporary pacemaker malfunction or postoperative cardiac arrhythmias.
RESULTS: Sixty-eight of 105 eligible patients participated in this study. Sixty-one (89.7%) of them completed NMES sessions. We found no patients who had excessive changes in systolic blood pressure, increased heart rate, or pacemaker malfunction during NMES. Incidence of atrial fibrillation during the study period was 26.9% (7/26) for coronary artery bypass surgery, 18.2% (4/22) for valvular surgery, and 20.0% (4/20) for combined or aortic surgery. No sustained ventricular arrhythmia or ventricular fibrillation was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that NMES can be safely implemented even in patients immediately after cardiovascular surgery.
Copyright © 2015 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arrhythmias, cardiac; Cardiovascular surgical procedures; Electric stimulation therapy; Hemodynamics; Rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25218214     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  17 in total

Review 1.  Aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation in the treatment of deconditioned patients in the acute care setting: the role of skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Michael Quittan
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2016-01-12

2.  Functional electrical stimulation improves quality of life by reducing intermittent claudication.

Authors:  David G Embrey; Gad Alon; Brenna A Brandsma; Felix Vladimir; Angela Silva; Bethann M Pflugeisen; Paul J Amoroso
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 4.164

3.  Safety and preliminary efficacy of functional electrical stimulation cycling in an individual with cervical cord injury, autonomic dysreflexia, and a pacemaker: Case report.

Authors:  Gevork N Corbin; Kelsi Weaver; David R Dolbow; Daniel Credeur; Sambit Pattanaik; Dobrivoje S Stokic
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  Respiratory flow and vital signs associated with the intensity of functional electrical stimulation delivered to human abdominal muscles during quiet breathing.

Authors:  Yoko Sewa; Kazuhide Tomita; Yukako Okuno; Hirotaka Ose; Shigeyuki Imura
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-12-27

5.  Ambulation capacity and functional outcome in patients undergoing neuromuscular electrical stimulation after cardiac valve surgery: A randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Telma Cristina Fontes Cerqueira; Manoel Luiz de Cerqueira Neto; Lucas de Assis Pereira Cacau; Géssica Uruga Oliveira; Walderi Monteiro da Silva Júnior; Vitor Oliveira Carvalho; José Teles de Mendonça; Valter Joviniano de Santana Filho
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 6.  Safety of neuromuscular electrical stimulation among critically ill patients: systematic review.

Authors:  Amanda Sachetti; Marta Fiorvanti Carpes; Alexandre Simões Dias; Graciele Sbruzzi
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

7.  The safety of electrical stimulation in patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators: A systematic review.

Authors:  James Badger; Paul Taylor; Ian Swain
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2017-12-05

8.  Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Improves Energy Substrate Metabolism and Survival in Mice With Acute Endotoxic Shock.

Authors:  Takayuki Irahara; Norio Sato; Kosuke Otake; Satoru Murata; Kazuo Inoue; Kaoru Koike; Hiroyuki Yokota
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.533

9.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation is feasible in patients with acute heart failure.

Authors:  Toru Kondo; Sumio Yamada; Daisuke Tanimura; Shingo Kazama; Toshikazu Ishihara; Masafumi Shimojo; Etsuo Iwata; Sayano Kondo; Hiroaki Hiraiwa; Toshiaki Kato; Hiroaki Sano; Yoshifumi Awaji; Takahiro Okumura; Toyoaki Murohara
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2019-08-28

10.  Muscle mass, strength and functional outcomes in critically ill patients after cardiothoracic surgery: does neuromuscular electrical stimulation help? The Catastim 2 randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Arabella Fischer; Matthias Spiegl; Klaus Altmann; Andreas Winkler; Anna Salamon; Michael Themessl-Huber; Mohamed Mouhieddine; Eva Maria Strasser; Arno Schiferer; Tatjana Paternostro-Sluga; Michael Hiesmayr
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.