Literature DB >> 25218013

Visceral fat and body composition changes in a female population after RYGBP: a two-year follow-up by DXA.

Alberto Bazzocchi1, Federico Ponti, Stefano Cariani, Danila Diano, Luca Leuratti, Ugo Albisinni, Giulio Marchesini, Giuseppe Battista.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to monitor the impact of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) on body composition over a 24-month period by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
METHODS: Forty-one women (40.6 ± 10.0 years old; 42.6 ± 6.6 kg/m(2)) entering a bariatric surgery programme were submitted to whole-body DXA (Lunar iDXA) before treatment and after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Fat mass (FM), non-bone lean mass (LM), bone mineral content (BMC) and density (BMD) were measured at whole body and regionally. Android visceral adipose tissue (VAT) was estimated by a recently validated software.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (44.3 ± 11.8 years old; BMI, 45.4 ± 8.9 kg/m(2)) concluded the study. Following surgery, the progressive decrease of BMI was associated with reduced whole-body and regional FM. LM showed a moderate decrease at 3 months and stabilized thereafter. A progressive decrease of total FM/LM and android FM/LM ratios were observed in the 3- to 6-month (-19.1 ± 8.4 % and -26.5 ± 10.9 %, respectively; p < 0.0001) and 6- to 12-month periods (-23.5 ± 16.8 % and -29.4 ± 23.9 %, respectively; p < 0.0001). VAT was the parameter showing the largest decrease (-65.6 ± 17.5 % at 12 months; p < 0.0001). Two years after the surgery, a slight but significant decrease of total and regional LM was observed, without any significant change in BMI.
CONCLUSIONS: Body composition significantly changes after RYGBP with a metabolically healthier redistribution of total and regional FM and a positive balance of FM/LM variation. DXA should be considered as a valid supplementary tool for the clinical assessment and follow-up in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25218013     DOI: 10.1007/s11695-014-1422-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  31 in total

1.  Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity: National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in obesity.

Authors:  Alberto Bazzocchi; Danila Diano
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  The Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry: Indications of Use and Reporting of DXA for Body Composition.

Authors:  David L Kendler; Joao L C Borges; Roger A Fielding; Akira Itabashi; Diane Krueger; Kathleen Mulligan; Bruno M Camargos; Brian Sabowitz; Chih-Hsing Wu; Elaine W Yu; John Shepherd
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  Beneficial effects of subcutaneous fat transplantation on metabolism.

Authors:  Thien T Tran; Yuji Yamamoto; Stephane Gesta; C Ronald Kahn
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 27.287

5.  Clinical observations in total body DXA: technical aspects of positioning and analysis.

Authors:  Jessie Libber; Neil Binkley; Diane Krueger
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 2.617

6.  Three-year results of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass-on-vertical banded gastroplasty: an effective and safe procedure which enables endoscopy and X-ray study of the stomach and biliary tract.

Authors:  Stefano Cariani; Enrico Amenta
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 7.  Increased fat intake, impaired fat oxidation, and failure of fat cell proliferation result in ectopic fat storage, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Eric Ravussin; Steven R Smith
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Changes in bone mineral density, body composition and adiponectin levels in morbidly obese patients after bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Fernando Carrasco; Manuel Ruz; Pamela Rojas; Attila Csendes; Annabella Rebolledo; Juana Codoceo; Jorge Inostroza; Karen Basfi-Fer; Karin Papapietro; Jorge Rojas; Fernando Pizarro; Manuel Olivares
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Changes in body composition, metabolic profile and nutritional status 24 months after gastric banding.

Authors:  C Gasteyger; M Suter; J M Calmes; R C Gaillard; V Giusti
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Dual-energy X-ray performs as well as clinical computed tomography for the measurement of visceral fat.

Authors:  Lisa K Micklesfield; Julia H Goedecke; Mark Punyanitya; Kevin E Wilson; Thomas L Kelly
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 5.002

View more
  22 in total

1.  Visceral fat measured by DXA is associated with increased risk of non-spine fractures in nonobese elderly women: a population-based prospective cohort analysis from the São Paulo Ageing & Health (SPAH) Study.

Authors:  L G Machado; D S Domiciano; C P Figueiredo; V F Caparbo; L Takayama; R M Oliveira; J B Lopes; P R Menezes; R M R Pereira
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Does bariatric surgery improve adipose tissue function?

Authors:  H Frikke-Schmidt; R W O'Rourke; C N Lumeng; D A Sandoval; R J Seeley
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 9.213

3.  Prospective Longitudinal Trends in Body Composition and Clinical Outcomes 3 Years Following Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Shiri Sherf-Dagan; Shira Zelber-Sagi; Assaf Buch; Nir Bar; Muriel Webb; Nasser Sakran; Asnat Raziel; David Goitein; Andrei Keidar; Oren Shibolet
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 4.  Subcutaneous fat loss is greater than visceral fat loss with diet and exercise, weight-loss promoting drugs and bariatric surgery: a critical review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  C Merlotti; V Ceriani; A Morabito; A E Pontiroli
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 5.095

5.  Short-Term Changes on Body Composition and Bone Mass After One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: a Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Artur Marc-Hernández; Jaime Ruiz-Tovar; Jose M Jimenez; Miguel A Carbajo; Maria Lopez; Maria J Cao; Maria J Castro
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Imaging of diabetic bone.

Authors:  Federico Ponti; Sara Guerri; Claudia Sassi; Giuseppe Battista; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Alberto Bazzocchi
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 3.633

7.  Drug disposition and modelling before and after gastric bypass: immediate and controlled-release metoprolol formulations.

Authors:  Ina Gesquiere; Adam S Darwich; Bart Van der Schueren; Jan de Hoon; Matthias Lannoo; Christophe Matthys; Amin Rostami; Veerle Foulon; Patrick Augustijns
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 8.  Quantitative imaging techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis and sarcopenia.

Authors:  Sara Guerri; Daniele Mercatelli; Maria Pilar Aparisi Gómez; Alessandro Napoli; Giuseppe Battista; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Alberto Bazzocchi
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

9.  Drug disposition before and after gastric bypass: fenofibrate and posaconazole.

Authors:  Ina Gesquiere; Bart Hens; Bart Van der Schueren; Raf Mols; Jan de Hoon; Matthias Lannoo; Christophe Matthys; Veerle Foulon; Patrick Augustijns
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Is There a Role for Visceral Adiposity in Inducing Type 2 Diabetes Remission in Severely Obese Patients Following Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch Surgery?

Authors:  Audrey Auclair; Julie Martin; Marjorie Bastien; Nadine Bonneville; Laurent Biertho; Simon Marceau; Frédéric-Simon Hould; Simon Biron; Stéfane Lebel; Odette Lescelleur; Jean-Pierre Després; Paul Poirier
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.