Literature DB >> 25218005

Correlation of obesity with patient-reported outcomes and complications after hip arthroscopy.

Jason A Collins1, Bryan G Beutel1, Garret Garofolo1, Thomas Youm2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate patient-reported outcomes and complications after hip arthroscopy in an obese population compared with a matched nonobese control group with a minimum 2-year follow-up, using the Modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS) and Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS).
METHODS: Data were analyzed from 21 consecutive obese patients (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30) and 18 nonobese patients (BMI < 25) who underwent hip arthroscopy between 2009 and 2012 with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Data collected included MHHS, NAHS, traction and intraoperative times, and postoperative complications.
RESULTS: Traction times were similar between obese and nonobese patients at 48 and 45 minutes (P = .51), respectively. Operative times were also similar at 54 and 51 minutes (P = .79), respectively. Each group had a statistically significant improvement in MHHS from baseline to final follow-up: 45 to 79 (P < .001) in the obese group and 49 to 81 (P < .001) in the nonobese cohort. Similarly, the NAHS showed significant improvement in each group from baseline to final follow-up: 43 to 75 (P < .001) in the obese cohort and 45 to 83 (P < .001) in the nonobese group. There was no difference between groups in MHHS or NAHS data. There were 8 complications in the obese group, most commonly deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and worsened pain, whereas the nonobese cohort had one complication (an instance of heterotopic ossification [HO]). Overall, obese patients had 11.1 times the risk of a complication developing than did nonobese patients (95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 99.7).
CONCLUSIONS: Hip arthroscopy in the obese patient population leads to improved short- to mid-term patient-reported outcomes similar to those seen in nonobese patients. Obese patients, however, are at a significantly increased risk of postoperative complications such as DVTs and worsened hip pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Copyright © 2015 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25218005     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  10 in total

Review 1.  Hip arthroscopy complications regarding surgery and early postoperative care: retrospective study and review of literature.

Authors:  R Seijas; O Ares; A Sallent; X Cuscó; P Álvarez-Díaz; R Tejedor; R Cugat
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-12-07

2.  Increased hip arthroscopy operative duration is an independent risk factor for overnight hospital admission.

Authors:  Patawut Bovonratwet; Venkat Boddapati; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Daniel D Bohl; Michael C Fu; Shane J Nho
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Ability to return to work without restrictions in workers compensation patients undergoing hip arthroscopy.

Authors:  Simon Lee; Gregory L Cvetanovich; Randy Mascarenhas; Thomas H Wuerz; Richard C Mather; Charles A Bush-Joseph; Shane J Nho
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2016-10-27

4.  Postoperative Numbness: A Survey of Patients After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery.

Authors:  Bashar Reda; Ivan Wong
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-05-10

Review 5.  A systematic review-meta-analysis of venous thromboembolic events following primary hip arthroscopy for FAI: clinical and epidemiologic considerations.

Authors:  Ioanna K Bolia; Lorenzo Fagotti; Shannen McNamara; Grant Dornan; Karen K Briggs; Marc J Philippon
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2018-08-17

Review 6.  Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after hip preservation surgery: a review and presentation of institutional experience.

Authors:  Arash Aali Rezaie; Ibrahim Azboy; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2018-10-01

Review 7.  Heterotopic Ossification After Arthroscopic Procedures: A Scoping Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Liang Zhou; Shawn M Gee; Joshua A Hansen; Matthew A Posner
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-01-18

Review 8.  Hip arthroscopy in obese, a successful combination?

Authors:  N H Bech; I F Kodde; F Dusseldorp; P A M C Druyts; S P L Jansen; D Haverkamp
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2015-11-27

9.  Parameters affecting baseline hip function in patients with cam-derived femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: data analysis from the German Cartilage Registry.

Authors:  Sebastian Serong; Moritz Schutzbach; Stefan Fickert; Philipp Niemeyer; Christian Sobau; Gunther Spahn; Wolfgang Zinser; Stefan Landgraeber
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2021-08-04

10.  Revision Surgery and Progression to Total Hip Arthroplasty After Surgical Correction of Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Nicola Maffulli; Alice Baroncini; Jörg Eschweiler; Markus Tingart; Marcel Betsch
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 6.202

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.