Bonnie Ghosh-Dastidar1, Deborah Cohen2, Gerald Hunter3, Shannon N Zenk4, Christina Huang5, Robin Beckman2, Tamara Dubowitz3. 1. RAND Corporation, Arlington, Virginia. Electronic address: bonnieg@rand.org. 2. Santa Monica, California. 3. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 4. Department of Health Systems Science, College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 5. Pardee RAND Graduate School, Santa Monica, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lack of access to healthy foods may explain why residents of low-income neighborhoods and African Americans in the U.S. have high rates of obesity. The findings on where people shop and how that may influence health are mixed. However, multiple policy initiatives are underway to increase access in communities that currently lack healthy options. Few studies have simultaneously measured obesity, distance, and prices of the store used for primary food shopping. PURPOSE: To examine the relationship among distance to store, food prices, and obesity. METHODS: The Pittsburgh Hill/Homewood Research on Eating, Shopping, and Health study conducted baseline interviews with 1,372 households between May and December 2011 in two low-income, majority African American neighborhoods without a supermarket. Audits of 16 stores where participants reported doing their major food shopping were conducted. Data were analyzed between February 2012 and February 2013. RESULTS: Distance to store and prices were positively associated with obesity (p<0.05). When distance to store and food prices were jointly modeled, only prices remained significant (p<0.01), with higher prices predicting a lower likelihood of obesity. Although low- and high-price stores did not differ in availability, they significantly differed in their display and marketing of junk foods relative to healthy foods. CONCLUSIONS: Placing supermarkets in food deserts to improve access may not be as important as simultaneously offering better prices for healthy foods relative to junk foods, actively marketing healthy foods, and enabling consumers to resist the influence of junk food marketing.
BACKGROUND: Lack of access to healthy foods may explain why residents of low-income neighborhoods and African Americans in the U.S. have high rates of obesity. The findings on where people shop and how that may influence health are mixed. However, multiple policy initiatives are underway to increase access in communities that currently lack healthy options. Few studies have simultaneously measured obesity, distance, and prices of the store used for primary food shopping. PURPOSE: To examine the relationship among distance to store, food prices, and obesity. METHODS: The Pittsburgh Hill/Homewood Research on Eating, Shopping, and Health study conducted baseline interviews with 1,372 households between May and December 2011 in two low-income, majority African American neighborhoods without a supermarket. Audits of 16 stores where participants reported doing their major food shopping were conducted. Data were analyzed between February 2012 and February 2013. RESULTS: Distance to store and prices were positively associated with obesity (p<0.05). When distance to store and food prices were jointly modeled, only prices remained significant (p<0.01), with higher prices predicting a lower likelihood of obesity. Although low- and high-price stores did not differ in availability, they significantly differed in their display and marketing of junk foods relative to healthy foods. CONCLUSIONS: Placing supermarkets in food deserts to improve access may not be as important as simultaneously offering better prices for healthy foods relative to junk foods, actively marketing healthy foods, and enabling consumers to resist the influence of junk food marketing.
Authors: Shannon N Zenk; Angela M Odoms-Young; Constance Dallas; Elaine Hardy; April Watkins; Jacqueline Hoskins-Wroten; Loys Holland Journal: Health Educ Behav Date: 2011-04-21
Authors: Dalia Stern; Jennifer M Poti; Shu Wen Ng; Whitney R Robinson; Penny Gordon-Larsen; Barry M Popkin Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2016-02-24 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Jonathan J Suarez; Tamara Isakova; Cheryl A M Anderson; L Ebony Boulware; Myles Wolf; Julia J Scialla Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 5.043