Yufang Ma1, Yuanying Gong1, Zhixiang Cheng1, Sudan Loganathan1, Crystal Kao1, Jann N Sarkaria1, Ty W Abel1, Jialiang Wang1. 1. Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (Y.M., Y.G., Z.C., C.K., J.W.); Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (T.W.A.); Department of Cancer Biology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (J.W.); Department of Pain Management and Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China (Z.C.); Department of Neuroscience and Pharmacology, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, Tennessee (S.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.N.S.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: RhoB is a member of the Rho small GTPase family that regulates cytoskeletal dynamics and vesicle trafficking. The RhoB homologs, RhoA and RhoC, have been shown to promote cancer progression and metastasis. In contrast, the functions of RhoB in human cancers are context dependent. Although expression of RhoB inversely correlates with disease progression in several epithelial cancers, recent data suggest that RhoB may support malignant phenotypes in certain cancer types. METHODS: We assessed RhoB protein levels in glioma surgical specimens and patient-derived xenografts. The roles of RhoB in glioblastoma were determined by loss-of-function and gain-of-function assays in vitro and in vivo. The impact on p53 and STAT3 signaling was investigated. RESULTS: RhoB expression was similar in tumor specimens compared with normal neural tissues obtained from epilepsy surgery. RhoB was expressed in the vast majority of xenograft tumors and spheroid cultures. Knockdown of RhoB induced cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis and compromised in vivo tumorigenic potential. However, overexpression of wild-type RhoB or a constitutively active mutant (RhoB-V14) did not significantly affect cell growth, which suggests that RhoB is not a rate-limiting oncogenic factor and is consistent with the scarcity of RhoB mutations in human cancer. Knockdown of RhoB reduced basal STAT3 activity and impaired cytokine-induced STAT3 activation. In glioblastoma tumors retaining wild-type p53, depletion of RhoB also activated p53 and induced expression of p21(CIP1) (/WAF1). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that RhoB belongs to an emerging class of "nononcogene addiction" factors that are essential for maintenance of malignant phenotypes in human cancers.
BACKGROUND:RhoB is a member of the Rho small GTPase family that regulates cytoskeletal dynamics and vesicle trafficking. The RhoB homologs, RhoA and RhoC, have been shown to promote cancer progression and metastasis. In contrast, the functions of RhoB in humancancers are context dependent. Although expression of RhoB inversely correlates with disease progression in several epithelial cancers, recent data suggest that RhoB may support malignant phenotypes in certain cancer types. METHODS: We assessed RhoB protein levels in glioma surgical specimens and patient-derived xenografts. The roles of RhoB in glioblastoma were determined by loss-of-function and gain-of-function assays in vitro and in vivo. The impact on p53 and STAT3 signaling was investigated. RESULTS:RhoB expression was similar in tumor specimens compared with normal neural tissues obtained from epilepsy surgery. RhoB was expressed in the vast majority of xenograft tumors and spheroid cultures. Knockdown of RhoB induced cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis and compromised in vivo tumorigenic potential. However, overexpression of wild-type RhoB or a constitutively active mutant (RhoB-V14) did not significantly affect cell growth, which suggests that RhoB is not a rate-limiting oncogenic factor and is consistent with the scarcity of RhoB mutations in humancancer. Knockdown of RhoB reduced basal STAT3 activity and impaired cytokine-induced STAT3 activation. In glioblastoma tumors retaining wild-type p53, depletion of RhoB also activated p53 and induced expression of p21(CIP1) (/WAF1). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that RhoB belongs to an emerging class of "nononcogene addiction" factors that are essential for maintenance of malignant phenotypes in humancancers.
Authors: Diego Luis-Ravelo; Iker Antón; Carolina Zandueta; Karmele Valencia; María-José Pajares; Jackeline Agorreta; Luis Montuenga; Silvestre Vicent; Ignacio I Wistuba; Javier De Las Rivas; Fernando Lecanda Journal: Mol Oncol Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 6.603
Authors: Olga A Guryanova; Qiulian Wu; Lin Cheng; Justin D Lathia; Zhi Huang; Jinbo Yang; Jennifer MacSwords; Christine E Eyler; Roger E McLendon; John M Heddleston; Weinian Shou; Dolores Hambardzumyan; Jeongwu Lee; Anita B Hjelmeland; Andrew E Sloan; Markus Bredel; George R Stark; Jeremy N Rich; Shideng Bao Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2011-04-12 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Marie-Annick Forget; Richard R Desrosiers; MaestroRolandaF Del; Robert Moumdjian; Daniel Shedid; France Berthelet; Richard Béliveau Journal: Clin Exp Metastasis Date: 2002 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: Anne Ducassou; Emmanuelle Uro-Coste; Pierre Verrelle; Thomas Filleron; Alexandra Benouaich-Amiel; Vincent Lubrano; Jean-Christophe Sol; Marie-Bernadette Delisle; Gilles Favre; Solea Ken; Anne Laprie; Peter De Porre; Christine Toulas; Muriel Poublanc; Elizabeth Cohen-Jonathan Moyal Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2013-04-06 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Shiva Kazerounian; Damien Gerald; Minzhou Huang; Y Rebecca Chin; Durga Udayakumar; Ningning Zheng; Rebekah K O'Donnell; Carole Perruzzi; Lee Mangiante; Jacob Pourat; Thuy L Phung; Arturo Bravo-Nuevo; Sharon Shechter; Stephanie McNamara; James B Duhadaway; Olivier N Kocher; Lawrence F Brown; Alex Toker; George C Prendergast; Laura E Benjamin Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2012-11-07 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Arko Sen; Briana C Prager; Cuiqing Zhong; Donglim Park; Zhe Zhu; Ryan C Gimple; Qiulian Wu; Jean A Bernatchez; Sungjun Beck; Alex E Clark; Jair L Siqueira-Neto; Jeremy N Rich; Graham McVicker Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2021-12-13 Impact factor: 13.312
Authors: Kim Clarke; Thomas Daubon; Nil Turan; Fabienne Soulet; Maihafizah Mohd Zahari; Katie R Ryan; Sarah Durant; Shan He; John Herbert; John Ankers; John K Heath; Rolf Bjerkvig; Roy Bicknell; Neil A Hotchin; Andreas Bikfalvi; Francesco Falciani Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2015-07-01 Impact factor: 5.917