Literature DB >> 25216357

Cognitive and neuropsychological underpinnings of relational and conjunctive working memory binding across age.

Bonnie van Geldorp1, Mario A Parra2,3, Roy P C Kessels1,4.   

Abstract

The ability to form associations (i.e., binding) is critical for memory formation. Recent studies suggest that aging specifically affects relational binding (associating separate features) but not conjunctive binding (integrating features within an object). Possibly, this dissociation may be driven by the spatial nature of the studies so far. Alternatively, relational binding may simply require more attentional resources. We assessed relational and conjunctive binding in three age groups and we included an interfering task (i.e., an articulatory suppression task). Binding was examined in a working memory (WM) task using non-spatial features: shape and colour. Thirty-one young adults (mean age = 22.35), 30 middle-aged adults (mean age = 54.80) and 30 older adults (mean age = 70.27) performed the task. Results show an effect of type of binding and an effect of age but no interaction between type of binding and age. The interaction between type of binding and interference was significant. These results indicate that aging affects relational binding and conjunctive binding similarly. However, relational binding is more susceptible to interference than conjunctive binding, which suggests that relational binding may require more attentional resources. We suggest that a general decline in WM resources associated with frontal dysfunction underlies age-related deficits in WM binding.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Binding; Relational memory; Working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25216357     DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2014.953959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  5 in total

1.  Item strength affects working memory capacity.

Authors:  Zhangfan Shen; Vencislav Popov; Anita B Delahay; Lynne M Reder
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-02

2.  Intraobject and extraobject memory binding across early development.

Authors:  Kevin P Darby; Per B Sederberg; Vladimir M Sloutsky
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2022-03-21

3.  Feature Binding of Common Everyday Items Is Not Affected by Age.

Authors:  Serge Hoefeijzers; Alfredis González Hernández; Angela Magnolia Rios; Mario A Parra
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 5.750

4.  Recalling feature bindings differentiates Alzheimer's disease from frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Mario Amore Cecchini; Mônica Sanches Yassuda; Valéria Santoro Bahia; Leonardo Cruz de Souza; Henrique Cerqueira Guimarães; Paulo Caramelli; Maria Teresa Carthery-Goulart; Flávia Patrocínio; Maria Paula Foss; Vitor Tumas; Thaís Bento Lima-Silva; Sônia Maria Dozzi Brucki; Ricardo Nitrini; Sergio Della Sala; Mario A Parra
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Refining understanding of working memory buffers through the construct of binding: Evidence from a single case informs theory and clinical practise.

Authors:  Pierre-Yves Jonin; Clara Calia; Sophie Muratot; Serge Belliard; Quentin Duché; Emmanuel J Barbeau; Mario A Parra
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 4.027

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.