| Literature DB >> 25216253 |
Pablo Méndez-Lázaro1, Frank E Muller-Karger2, Daniel Otis3, Matthew J McCarthy4, Marisol Peña-Orellana5.
Abstract
We test the hypothesis that climate and environmental conditions are becoming favorable for dengue transmission in San Juan, Puerto Rico. Sea Level Pressure (SLP), Mean Sea Level (MSL), Wind, Sea Surface Temperature (SST), Air Surface Temperature (AST), Rainfall, and confirmed dengue cases were analyzed. We evaluated the dengue incidence and environmental data with Principal Component Analysis, Pearson correlation coefficient, Mann-Kendall trend test and logistic regressions. Results indicated that dry days are increasing and wet days are decreasing. MSL is increasing, posing higher risk of dengue as the perimeter of the San Juan Bay estuary expands and shorelines move inland. Warming is evident with both SST and AST. Maximum and minimum air surface temperature extremes have increased. Between 1992 and 2011, dengue transmission increased by a factor of 3.4 (95% CI: 1.9-6.1) for each 1 °C increase in SST. For the period 2007-2011 alone, dengue incidence reached a factor of 5.2 (95% CI: 1.9-13.9) for each 1 °C increase in SST. Teenagers are consistently the age group that suffers the most infections in San Juan. Results help understand possible impacts of different climate change scenarios in planning for social adaptation and public health interventions.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25216253 PMCID: PMC4199026 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph110909409
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Puerto Rico and location of the municipality of San Juan.
Database and periods studied.
| Variable | Period | Time Step |
|---|---|---|
| Dengue Cases | 1992–2011 | Daily |
| Rainfall | 1899–2011 | Daily |
| Air Surface Temperature | 1899–2011 | Daily |
| Sea Surface Temperature | 1981–2012 | Monthly |
| Sea Level Pressure | 1978–2012 | Daily |
| Wind Speed | 1978–2012 | Daily |
| Mean Sea Level | 1978–2012 | Daily |
The Extreme Temperature and Precipitation Indices.
| ID | Indicator Name | Indicator Dentitions | Units |
|---|---|---|---|
| TN10p | Cool nights | Percentage of time when daily min temperature < 10th percentile | % |
| TX10p | Cool days | Percentage of time when daily max temperature < 10th percentile | % |
| TN90p | Warm nights | Percentage of time when daily min temperature > 90th Percentile | % |
| TX90p | Warm days | Percentage of time when daily max temperature > 90th percentile | % |
| WSDI | Warm spell duration indicator | Annual count when at least six consecutive days of max temperature > 90th percentile | days |
| CSDIN | Cold spell duration indicator | Annual count when at least six consecutive days of min temperature < 10th percentile | days |
| CSDIX | Cold spell duration indicator | Annual count when at least six consecutive days of max temperature < 10th percentile | days |
| PRCPTOT | Annual total wet-day precipitation | Annual total precipitation from days ≥ 1 mm | mm |
| R10 | Number of heavy precipitation days | Annual count when precipitation ≥ 10 mm | days |
| R20 | Number of very heavy precipitation days | Annual count when precipitation ≥ 20 mm | days |
| CDD | Consecutive dry days | Maximum number of consecutive days when precipitation < 1 mm | days |
| CWD | Consecutive wet days | Maximum number of consecutive days when precipitation ≥ 1 mm | days |
| R95p | Very wet days | Annual total precipitation from days > 95th percentile | mm |
| R99p | Extremely wet days | Annual total precipitation from days > 99th percentile | mm |
Figure 2Upper Panel: Annual rainfall anomaly (blue bars) and moving average (red broken line). Lower Left: Anomalies for dry days (blue bars) and moving average (red line); Lower Right: Anomalies for wet days (blue bars) and moving average (red line); 1899–2011.
Figure 3Upper Panel: Time series of annual average minimum and average maximum air surface temperature. Middle: Seasonal Trends in annual average minimum and maximum air temperature. DJF indicates December-January-February and JJA indicates June-July-August. Lower Left: Consecutive days > 90th percentile Tmin (25 °C). Lower Right: TN90p (San Juan 1899–2011).
Ocean and meteorological Mann-Kendall trend analysis. Positive “S” indicates a positive trend. Negative “S” values indicate negative trends. If p < 0.05, the slope is significantly different from zero.
| ID | S | Test Interpretation | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CWD | −195 | 0.63 | Accept H0 |
| CDD | 516 | 0.20 | Accept H0 |
| #Days > 1 mm | |||
| Max Consecutive days > 90th (13 mm) | −169 | 0.66 | Accept H0 |
| Max Consecutive days R10 mm | 66 | 0.86 | Accept H0 |
| #Days < 1 mm | |||
| R10 | −676 | 0.09 | Accept H0 |
| R20 | −407 | 0.31 | Accept H0 |
| Max Consecutive days > 95th (22.1 mm) | −412 | 0.26 | Accept H0 |
| Max Consecutive days> R20 mm | −119 | 0.75 | Accept H0 |
| Max Consecutive days > 99th (49.8 mm) | −74 | 0.82 | Accept H0 |
| #Days > 99th (49.8 mm) | 168 | 0.67 | Accept H0 |
| #Days > 95th (22.1 mm) | −544 | 0.18 | Accept H0 |
| TN10p | |||
| TX10p | |||
| TN90p | |||
| TX90p | |||
| WSDI | |||
| CSDIX | |||
| CSDIN | |||
| SLP Annual Max | |||
| SLP Annual Min | 36 | 0.591 | Accept H0 |
| SLP Annual Average | |||
| SLP #Days < 10th percentile | |||
| SLP Monthly Max | |||
| MSL Max | |||
| MSL Min | |||
| MSL Average | |||
| SST Annual Max | |||
| SST Annual Min | Accept H0 | ||
| Wind Speed Annual Average | Accept H0 | ||
| Wind Speed Annual Max |
Figure 4Upper Panel: Annual Maximum and Minimum Mean Sea Level. Middle: Seasonal Mean Sea Level (DJF-December, January and February; JJA-June, July and August). Lower Left: Maximum Annual Mean Sea Level trends. Lower Right: Mean Sea Level annual 90th percentile per decade.
Figure 5Top Panel: Seasonal Sea Surface Temperature trends (AVHRR Pathfinder v5.2 SST, extracted in a 4x4 km2 area in the Atlantic Ocean immediately off San Juan 1981–2012). Lower Panel: Number of days showing extremely high SST (above the 90th percentile: 29 °C, and 95th percentile: 29.4 °C).
Figure 6Upper: Monthly sea surface temperature (SST), minimum air surface temperature (Tmin) and monthly dengue cases (2000–2011). Middle: Weekly rainfall and dengue. Lower: Minimum air surface temperature and weekly dengue cases.
Monthly correlation matrix Pearson. 1992–2011.
| Periods | Variables | Dengue Cases | SST | SLP | Rainfall | Tmax | Tmin | MSL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1992–2011 | Dengue Cases | 0.22 | 0.16 | 0.25 | ||||
| SST | ||||||||
| SLP | ||||||||
| Rainfall | 0.22 | 0.19 | 0.29 | |||||
| Tmax | 0.16 | 0.19 | ||||||
| Tmin | 0.25 | |||||||
| MSL | 0.29 |
Note: Values in bold are different from 0 with a significance level alpha = 0.05.
Figure 7Comparison of age-specific dengue incidence rates per 1000 inhabitants in epidemic years (1994, 1998, 2007, and 2010) in San Juan. Upper Panel: Age-specific dengue incidence rates (age groups <24 years old and >60 years old). Lower Panel: Age-specific dengue incidence rates (all age groups).