Literature DB >> 25216023

Intercropping enhances soil carbon and nitrogen.

Wen-Feng Cong1, Ellis Hoffland, Long Li, Johan Six, Jian-Hao Sun, Xing-Guo Bao, Fu-Suo Zhang, Wopke Van Der Werf.   

Abstract

Intercropping, the simultaneous cultivation of multiple crop species in a single field, increases aboveground productivity due to species complementarity. We hypothesized that intercrops may have greater belowground productivity than sole crops, and sequester more soil carbon over time due to greater input of root litter. Here, we demonstrate a divergence in soil n class="Chemical">organic carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) content over 7 years in a field experiment that compared rotational strip intercrop systems and ordinary crop rotations. Soil organic C content in the top 20 cm was 4% ± 1% greater in intercrops than in sole crops, indicating a difference in C sequestration rate between intercrop and sole crop systems of 184 ± 86 kg C ha(-1) yr(-1). Soil organic N content in the top 20 cm was 11% ± 1% greater in intercrops than in sole crops, indicating a difference in N sequestration rate between intercrop and sole crop systems of 45 ± 10 kg N ha(-1) yr(-1). Total root biomass in intercrops was on average 23% greater than the average root biomass in sole crops, providing a possible mechanism for the observed divergence in soil C sequestration between sole crop and intercrop systems. A lowering of the soil δ(15) N signature suggested that increased biological N fixation and/or reduced gaseous N losses contributed to the increases in soil N in intercrop rotations with faba bean. Increases in soil N in wheat/maize intercrop pointed to contributions from a broader suite of mechanisms for N retention, e.g., complementary N uptake strategies of the intercropped plant species. Our results indicate that soil C sequestration potential of strip intercropping is similar in magnitude to that of currently recommended management practises to conserve organic matter in soil. Intercropping can contribute to multiple agroecosystem services by increased yield, better soil quality and soil C sequestration.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ecosystem services; functional complementarity; intercropping; plant diversity; plant productivity; root biomass; soil carbon; soil nitrogen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25216023     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  17 in total

1.  Citrus stand ages regulate the fraction alteration of soil organic carbon under a citrus/Stropharua rugodo-annulata intercropping system in the Three Gorges Reservoir area, China.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jiupai Ni; John Yang; Tong Zhang; Deti Xie
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Integrated farming with intercropping increases food production while reducing environmental footprint.

Authors:  Qiang Chai; Thomas Nemecek; Chang Liang; Cai Zhao; Aizhong Yu; Jeffrey A Coulter; Yifan Wang; Falong Hu; Li Wang; Kadambot H M Siddique; Yantai Gan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Intercropping Pinto Peanut in Litchi Orchard Effectively Improved Soil Available Potassium Content, Optimized Soil Bacterial Community Structure, and Advanced Bacterial Community Diversity.

Authors:  Ya Zhao; Caibin Yan; Fuchu Hu; Zhiwen Luo; Shiqing Zhang; Min Xiao; Zhe Chen; Hongyan Fan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 6.064

4.  Finding the right mix: a framework for selecting seeding rates for cover crop mixtures.

Authors:  K Ann Bybee-Finley; Stéphane Cordeau; Séverin Yvoz; Steven B Mirsky; Matthew R Ryan
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 6.105

Review 5.  Plant Breeding for Intercropping in Temperate Field Crop Systems: A Review.

Authors:  Virginia M Moore; Brandon Schlautman; Shui-Zhang Fei; Lucas M Roberts; Marnin Wolfe; Matthew R Ryan; Samantha Wells; Aaron J Lorenz
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Genotypic Differences in Phosphorus Efficiency and the Performance of Physiological Characteristics in Response to Low Phosphorus Stress of Soybean in Southwest of China.

Authors:  Tao Zhou; Yongli Du; Shoaib Ahmed; Ting Liu; Menglu Ren; Weiguo Liu; Wenyu Yang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Straw and residual film management enhances crop yield and weakens CO2 emissions in wheat-maize intercropping system.

Authors:  Zhiwen Gou; Wen Yin; Qiang Chai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Proteome characterization of two contrasting soybean genotypes in response to different phosphorus treatments.

Authors:  Hongyu Zhao; Ahui Yang; Lingjian Kong; Futi Xie; Haiying Wang; Xue Ao
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 3.276

9.  Intercropping with wheat lowers nutrient uptake and biomass accumulation of maize, but increases photosynthetic rate of the ear leaf.

Authors:  Fang Gou; Martin K van Ittersum; Antoine Couëdel; Yue Zhang; Yajun Wang; Peter E L van der Putten; Lizhen Zhang; Wopke van der Werf
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.276

10.  Diversity and Co-occurrence Patterns of Soil Bacterial and Fungal Communities in Seven Intercropping Systems.

Authors:  Sen Li; Fengzhi Wu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.