Literature DB >> 25215191

Accurate detection of Campylobacter spp. antigens by immunochromatography and enzyme immunoassay in routine microbiological laboratory.

Thomas Regnath, Ralf Ignatius.   

Abstract

Campylobacter spp. are fastidious microorganisms, and their detection by culture depends on the freshness of the stool sample and the skills of the laboratory staff. To improve laboratory diagnosis, assays for the detection of specific antigens have been developed. Here, we evaluated two assays for the detection of Campylobacter spp.-specific antigens, i.e., one immunochromatographic test and one enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (EIA), in 38 frozen Campylobacter spp.-positive specimens and prospectively in 533 fresh stool samples with a conventional enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and culture. Both assays were positive for 36 samples with Campylobacter jejuni and one with Campylobacter coli among 38 Campylobacter spp.-positive frozen samples. One Campylobacter lari-positive sample was identified by the immunochromatographic assay (ICA) only. In a prospective study performed within the course of routine microbiology, both assays were positive for 24/25 C. jejuni culture-positive samples (positive percent agreement, 96.0% [95% CI: 78.9-100%]). ICA and EIA also were positive for 14 and 10 culture-negative samples, respectively (negative percent agreement: ICA, 97.2% [95% CI: 95.4-98.4%]; EIA, 98.0% [95% CI: 96.4-99.0%]). In conclusion, the high agreement between both antigen-detection assays and culture indicates that both assays may be initially performed followed by culture only upon a positive test result.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Campylobacter; antigen detection; culture; enzyme immunoassay; immunochromatographic assay

Year:  2014        PMID: 25215191      PMCID: PMC4160794          DOI: 10.1556/EUJMI-D-14-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp)        ISSN: 2062-509X


  18 in total

1.  False-positive results of Campylobacter rapid antigen testing.

Authors:  Angela L Myers; Mary Anne Jackson; Rangaraj Selvarangan
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Rapid detection of Campylobacter antigen by enzyme immunoassay leads to increased positivity rates.

Authors:  Carmen L Giltner; Sandra Saeki; April M Bobenchik; Romney M Humphries
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Detection of non-jejuni and -coli Campylobacter species from stool specimens with an immunochromatographic antigen detection assay.

Authors:  Brianne A Couturier; Marc Roger Couturier; Kim J Kalp; Mark A Fisher
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  New methods for detection of campylobacters in stool samples in comparison to culture.

Authors:  Emilie Bessède; Adline Delcamp; Elodie Sifré; Alice Buissonnière; Francis Mégraud
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of immunochromatography, PCR and culture methods for the detection of Campylobacter bacteria.

Authors:  Shuvra Kanti Dey; Shuichi Nishimura; Shoko Okitsu; Satoshi Hayakawa; Masashi Mizuguchi; Hiroshi Ushijima
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 2.363

6.  Comparison of premier CAMPY enzyme immunoassay (EIA), ProSpecT Campylobacter EIA, and ImmunoCard STAT! CAMPY tests with culture for laboratory diagnosis of Campylobacter enteric infections.

Authors:  Paul A Granato; Li Chen; Iris Holiday; Russell A Rawling; Susan M Novak-Weekley; Tammy Quinlan; Kimberlee A Musser
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Campylobacter.

Authors:  John E Moore; Deborah Corcoran; James S G Dooley; Séamus Fanning; Brigid Lucey; Motoo Matsuda; David A McDowell; Francis Mégraud; B Cherie Millar; Rebecca O'Mahony; Lisa O'Riordan; Michele O'Rourke; Juluri R Rao; Paul J Rooney; Andrew Sails; Paul Whyte
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.683

8.  Rapid detection of Campylobacter jejuni in stool specimens by an enzyme immunoassay and surveillance for Campylobacter upsaliensis in the greater Salt Lake City area.

Authors:  M Hindiyeh; S Jense; S Hohmann; H Benett; C Edwards; W Aldeen; A Croft; J Daly; S Mottice; K C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  Culture media for the isolation of campylobacters.

Authors:  J E Corry; D E Post; P Colin; M J Laisney
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.277

10.  Evaluation of the positive predictive value of a rapid Immunochromatographic test to detect Campylobacter in stools.

Authors:  Pauline Floch; Julien Goret; Emilie Bessède; Philippe Lehours; Francis Mégraud
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 4.181

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Developments in Rapid Detection Methods for the Detection of Foodborne Campylobacter in the United States.

Authors:  Steven C Ricke; Kristina M Feye; W Evan Chaney; Zhaohao Shi; Hilary Pavlidis; Yichao Yang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 5.640

2.  A Cutoff Determination of Real-Time Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) for End-Point Detection of Campylobacter jejuni in Chicken Meat.

Authors:  Chalita Jainonthee; Warangkhana Chaisowwong; Phakamas Ngamsanga; Anuwat Wiratsudakul; Tongkorn Meeyam; Duangporn Pichpol
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-03-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.