Ye-Cheng Liu1, Ji-Hai Liu1, Zhe Amy Fang2, Guang-Liang Shan3, Jun Xu1, Zhi-Wei Qi4, Hua-Dong Zhu1, Zhong Wang1, Xue-Zhong Yu1. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing 100730, China. 2. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Alberta, Canada. 3. Institute of Epidemiology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine whether modified shock index (MSI) is associated with mortality that is superior to heart rate, blood pressure, or the shock index (SI) in emergency patients. METHODS: A retrospective database review was performed on 22 161 patients who presented to Peking Union Medical College Hospital Emergency Department and received intravenous fluids from January 1 to December 31, 2009. We gathered data of the patients on age, gender, vital signs, levels of consciousness, presenting complaints, and SI and MSI were calculated for all patients. RESULTS: Multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine the correlation between risk factors and outcome. There is a significant correlation between emergency patient mortality rate and patient's vital signs obtained at the triage desk (HR>120 beats/min, systolic BP<90 mmHg, diastolic BP<60 mmHg). MSI is a stronger predictor of emergency patient mortality compared to heart rate and blood pressure alone, whereas SI does not have a significant correlation with emergency patient mortality rate. CONCLUSION: MSI is a clinically significant predictor of mortality in emergency patients. It may be better than using heart rate and blood pressure alone. SI is not significantly correlated with the mortality rate of the emergency patient.
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine whether modified shock index (MSI) is associated with mortality that is superior to heart rate, blood pressure, or the shock index (SI) in emergency patients. METHODS: A retrospective database review was performed on 22 161 patients who presented to Peking Union Medical College Hospital Emergency Department and received intravenous fluids from January 1 to December 31, 2009. We gathered data of the patients on age, gender, vital signs, levels of consciousness, presenting complaints, and SI and MSI were calculated for all patients. RESULTS: Multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine the correlation between risk factors and outcome. There is a significant correlation between emergency patient mortality rate and patient's vital signs obtained at the triage desk (HR>120 beats/min, systolic BP<90 mmHg, diastolic BP<60 mmHg). MSI is a stronger predictor of emergency patient mortality compared to heart rate and blood pressure alone, whereas SI does not have a significant correlation with emergency patient mortality rate. CONCLUSION: MSI is a clinically significant predictor of mortality in emergency patients. It may be better than using heart rate and blood pressure alone. SI is not significantly correlated with the mortality rate of the emergency patient.
Authors: Daniel R McAdams; Noah J Kolodziejski; Christopher J Stapels; Daniel E Fernandez; Matthew J Podolsky; Dana Farkas; James F Christian; Michael J Joyner; Christopher P Johnson; Norman A Paradis Journal: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng Date: 2016-03-17
Authors: José Rojas-Suarez; Ángel Paternina-Caicedo; Jorge E Tolosa; Leidy Guzmán-Polanía; Nataly Gonzalez; Fredy Pomares; Augusto Maza; Jezid Miranda Journal: Obstet Med Date: 2019-04-26
Authors: Cheng-Shyuan Rau; Shao-Chun Wu; Spencer C H Kuo; Kuo Pao-Jen; Hsu Shiun-Yuan; Yi-Chun Chen; Hsiao-Yun Hsieh; Ching-Hua Hsieh; Hang-Tsung Liu Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-07-05 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Soon Yong Kim; Ki Jeong Hong; Sang Do Shin; Young Sun Ro; Ki Ok Ahn; Yu Jin Kim; Eui Jung Lee Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 2.153