Literature DB >> 25214943

Continuous tracheal gas insufflation during protective mechanical ventilation in juvenile piglets with acute lung injury induced by endotoxin.

Zhong-Liang Guo1, Tao Ren1, Ying-Yun Cai1, Guo-Ping Lu1, Jing-Yu Gong1, Yong-Jie Liang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low tidal volume mechanical ventilation is difficult to correct hypoxemia, and prolonged inhalation of pure oxygen can lead to oxygen poisoning. We suggest that continuous tracheal gas insufflation (TGI) during protective mechanical ventilation could improve cardiopulmonary function in acute lung injury.
METHODS: Totally 12 healthy juvenile piglets were anesthetized and mechanically ventilated at PEEP of 2 cmH2O with a peak inspiratory pressure of 10 cmH2O. The piglets were challenged with lipopolysaccharide and randomly assigned into two groups (n=6 each group): mechanical ventilation (MV) alone and TGI with continuous airway flow 2 l/min. FIO2 was set at 0.4 to avoid oxygen toxicity and continuously monitored with an oxygen analyzer.
RESULTS: Tidal volume, ventilation efficacy index and mean airway resistant pressure were significantly improved in the TGI group (P<0.01 or P<0.05). At 4 hours post ALI, pH decreased to below 7.20 in the MV group, and improved in the TGI group (P<0.01). Similarly, PaCO2 was stable and was significantly lower in the TGI group than in the MV group (P<0.01). PaO2 and PaO2/FIO2 increased also in the TGI group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in heart rate, respiratory rate, mean artery pressure, central venous pressure, dynamic lung compliance and mean resistance of airway between the two groups. Lung histological examination showed reduced inflammation, reduced intra-alveolar and interstitial patchy hemorrhage, and homogenously expanded lungs in the TGI group.
CONCLUSION: Continuous TGI during MV can significantly improve gas exchange and ventilation efficacy and may provide a better treatment for acute lung injury.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute lung injury; Lung protective strategy; Mechanical ventilation; Tracheal gas insufflation

Year:  2010        PMID: 25214943      PMCID: PMC4129769     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Emerg Med        ISSN: 1920-8642


  16 in total

1.  The value of early enteral nutrition in the prophylaxis of stress ulceration in the severely burned patient.

Authors:  T Raff; G Germann; B Hartmann
Journal:  Burns       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.744

2.  Clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients with and without stress-ulcer prophylaxis.

Authors:  Christophe Faisy; Emmanuel Guerot; Jean-Luc Diehl; Eléonore Iftimovici; Jean-Yves Fagon
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Stress-induced ulcer bleeding in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Tauseef Ali; Richard F Harty
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.806

4.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008.

Authors:  R Phillip Dellinger; Mitchell M Levy; Jean M Carlet; Julian Bion; Margaret M Parker; Roman Jaeschke; Konrad Reinhart; Derek C Angus; Christian Brun-Buisson; Richard Beale; Thierry Calandra; Jean-Francois Dhainaut; Herwig Gerlach; Maurene Harvey; John J Marini; John Marshall; Marco Ranieri; Graham Ramsay; Jonathan Sevransky; B Taylor Thompson; Sean Townsend; Jeffrey S Vender; Janice L Zimmerman; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ilona Kantorova; Petr Svoboda; Peter Scheer; Jaroslav Doubek; Dagmar Rehorkova; Hana Bosakova; Jiri Ochmann
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2004 May-Jun

Review 6.  Stress-related mucosal disease in the critically ill patient: risk factors and strategies to prevent stress-related bleeding in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Kenneth P Steinberg
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 7.  Stress-related mucosal disease in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Donald R Duerksen
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.043

Review 8.  Gastrointestinal complications in critically ill patients: what differs between adults and children?

Authors:  Jesús López-Herce
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.294

9.  Nosocomial pneumonia risk and stress ulcer prophylaxis: a comparison of pantoprazole vs ranitidine in cardiothoracic surgery patients.

Authors:  Todd A Miano; Marc G Reichert; Timothy T Houle; Drew A MacGregor; Edward H Kincaid; David L Bowton
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 10.  Multiple organ dysfunction score: a reliable descriptor of a complex clinical outcome.

Authors:  J C Marshall; D J Cook; N V Christou; G R Bernard; C L Sprung; W J Sibbald
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 7.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.