| Literature DB >> 25214826 |
Mohamed M Shoukry1, Sameya M T Ezzat2.
Abstract
Pd(MME)Cl2 complex (MME = methionine methyl ester) was synthesised and characterized by physicochemical measurements. The reaction of [Pd(MME)(H2O)2](2+) with amino acids, peptides, or dicarboxylic acids was investigated at 25°C and 0.1 M ionic strength. Amino acids and dicarboxylic acids form 1 : 1 complexes. Peptides form both 1 : 1 complexes and the corresponding deprotonated amide species. The stability of the complexes formed was determined and the binding centres of the ligands were assigned. Effect of solvent on the stability constant of Pd(MME)-CBDCA complex, taken as a representative example, shows that the complex is more favoured in a medium of low dielectric constant. The concentration distribution diagrams of the complexes were evaluated.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25214826 PMCID: PMC4158289 DOI: 10.1155/2014/382646
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioinorg Chem Appl Impact factor: 7.778
Formation constants for complexes of [Pd(MME)(H2O)2]2+ with amino acids at 25°C and 0.1 M ionic strength.
| System | M | L | Ha | log | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pd(MME)-OH | 1 | 0 | −1 | −5.29 (0.01) | 5.29 |
| 1 | 0 | −2 | −12.96 (0.05) | 7.67 | |
| 2 | 0 | −1 | −2.46 (0.07) | ||
|
| |||||
| Glycine | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9.60 (0.01) | 9.60 |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 11.93 (0.02) | 2.33 | |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 10.40 (0.03) | ||
|
| |||||
| Alanine | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9.69 (0.01) | 9.69 |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 11.89 (0.02) | 2.20 | |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 10.33 (0.05) | ||
|
| |||||
| Proline | 0 | 1 | 1 | 10.52 (0.01) | 10.52 |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 12.03 (0.04) | 1.51 | |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 10.79 (0.02) | ||
|
| |||||
|
| 0 | 1 | 1 | 9.12 (0.01) | 9.12 |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 11.01 (0.02) | 1.89 | |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.87 (0.04) | ||
|
| |||||
| Imidazole | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7.04 (0.01) | 7.04 |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 8.41 (0.04) | ||
| 1 | 2 | 0 | 15.93 (0.06) | ||
|
| |||||
| Lysine | 0 | 1 | 1 | 10.51 (0.00) | 10.51 |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 19.71 (0.01) | 9.20 | |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 11.15 (0.01) | 10.17 | |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 20.29 (0.07) | 9.14 | |
|
| |||||
| Methionine | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8.76 (0.00) | 8.76 |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.05 (0.04) | ||
|
| |||||
| Histamine | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9.88 (0.01) | 9.88 |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 15.30 (0.01) | 5.42 | |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 12.54 (0.04) | 3.43 | |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 15.97 (0.1) | 3.43 | |
|
| |||||
| Histidine | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9.52 (0.01) | 9.52 |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 15.81 (0.02) | 6.29 | |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 14.26 (0.07) | ||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 18.30 (0.09) | 4.0 | |
aM, L, and H are the stoichiometric coefficients corresponding to Pd(MME), amino acid, and H+, respectively; the coefficient −1 refers to a proton loss; blogβ of Pd(MME)-amino acids complexes, standard deviations are given in parentheses; sum of square of residuals is less than 2E − 7; cthe pK a of the ligands and the protonated complexes.
Formation constants for complexes of [Pd(MME)(H2O)2]2+ with peptides at 25°C and 0.1 M ionic strength.
| System | M | L | Ha | log | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glycinamide | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7.88 (0.02) | 7.88 |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 7.25 (0.05) | ||
| 1 | 1 | −1 | 3.96 (0.01) | 3.29 | |
|
| |||||
| Glycylglycine | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7.94 (0.01) | 7.94 |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 10.80 (0.01) | 2.86 | |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 8.55 (0.04) | ||
| 1 | 1 | −1 | 3.17 (0.06) | 5.38 | |
|
| |||||
| Asparagine | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8.56 (0.01) | 8.56 |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.11 (0.03) | ||
| 1 | 1 | −1 | 1.63 (0.04) | 7.48 | |
|
| |||||
| Glutamine | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9.50 (0.01) | 9.50 |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.78 (0.06) | ||
| 1 | 1 | −1 | 0.93 (0.01) | 8.85 | |
aM, L, and H are the stoichiometric coefficients corresponding to Pd(MME), peptides, and H+, respectively; the coefficient −1 refers to a proton loss; blogβ of Pd(MME)-peptide complexes, standard deviations are given in parentheses and sum of square of residuals is less than 5E − 7; cthe pK a of the peptides or of coordinated peptides.
Formation constants for complexes of [Pd(MME)(H2O)2]2+ with dibasic acids at 25°C and 0.1 M ionic strength.
| System | M | L | Ha | log | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cyclobutane-1,1-dicarboxylic acid | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5.42 (0.00) | 5.42 |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 8.06 (0.01) | 2.64 | |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 7.13 (0.01) | ||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 8.95 (0.07) | 1.82 | |
|
| |||||
| Malonic acid | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5.30 (0.00) | 5.30 |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 7.86 (0.01) | 2.56 | |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 6.84 (0.06) | ||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 10.29 (0.08) | 3.45 | |
|
| |||||
| Oxalic acid | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3.83 (0.00) | 3.83 |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 5.66 (0.01) | 1.83 | |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 7.16 (0.04) | ||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 10.3 (0.05) | 3.14 | |
|
| |||||
| Succinic acid | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5.21 (0.00) | 5.21 |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 9.26 (0.00) | 4.05 | |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 4.27 (0.03) | ||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 8.45 (0.08) | 4.18 | |
|
| |||||
| Adipic acid | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5.11 (0.03) | 5.11 |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 9.35 (0.04) | 5.24 | |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 4.11 (0.02) | ||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.494 (0.04) | 3.62 | |
aM, L, and H are the stoichiometric coefficients corresponding to Pd(MME), dibasic acids, and H+, respectively. blogβ of Pd(MME)-dibasic acid complexes; standard deviations are given in parentheses; sum of square of residuals is less than 1.57e −8. cThe pK a of ligands or the protonated complexes.
Effect of solvent (dioxane) on the stability constant of Pd(MME)-CBDCA complexes.
| System | % Solvent (v/v) | M | L | H | log |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pd(MME)-CBDCA | 12.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6.24 (0.01) |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 9.76 (0.02) | ||
| 1 | 0 | −1 | −4.07 (0.01) | ||
| 1 | 0 | −2 | −9.63 (0.03) | ||
| 2 | 0 | −1 | −1.08 (0.04) | ||
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 8.19 (0.03) | ||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 10.84 (0.07) | ||
| 25.0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6.86 (0.03) | |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 10.72 (0.05) | ||
| 1 | 0 | −1 | −3.67 (0.09) | ||
| 1 | 0 | −2 | −8.93 (0.02) | ||
| 2 | 0 | −1 | −0.59 (0.09) | ||
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 8.69 (0.03) | ||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 11.64 (0.07) | ||
| 37.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7.16 (0.01) | |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 11.33 (0.02) | ||
| 1 | 0 | −1 | −3.86 (0.01) | ||
| 1 | 0 | −2 | −9.13 (0.01) | ||
| 2 | 0 | −1 | −0.78 (0.40) | ||
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.07 (0.04) | ||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 12.65 (0.06) | ||
| 50.0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7.42 (0.01) | |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 11.85 (0.01) | ||
| 1 | 0 | −1 | −3.87 (0.01) | ||
| 1 | 0 | −2 | −9.40 (0.02) | ||
| 2 | 0 | −1 | −0.43 (0.07) | ||
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.08 (0.04) | ||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 13.09 (0.05) | ||
| 62.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7.88 (0.01) | |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 12.78 (0.02) | ||
| 1 | 0 | −1 | −3.85 (0.02) | ||
| 1 | 0 | −2 | −9.80 (0.02) | ||
| 2 | 0 | −1 | −0.30 (0.04) | ||
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.8 (0.01) | ||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 14.08 (0.02) |
Figure 1Concentration distribution of various species as a function of pH in the Pd(MME)-OH system (at concentration of 1.25 mmole/liter for Pd(MME)).
Figure 2Concentration distribution of various species as a function of pH in the Pd(MME)-CBDCA system (at concentration of 1.25 mmole/liter for Pd(MME) and CBDCA).
Figure 3Effect of dioxane on the CBDCA complex formation constant, Logβ 110.
Figure 4Effect of dioxane on the CBDCA complex formation constant, Logβ 111.