Amy Hughes Lansing1, Cynthia A Berg2. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Utah. 2. Department of Psychology, University of Utah cynthia.berg@psych.utah.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To illustrate adolescent self-regulation as a foundation for both individual and interpersonal processes in adolescent chronic illness self-management. METHOD: Literature review. RESULTS: Research has identified multiple individual (e.g., self-efficacy, coping, and adherence) and interpersonal factors (parental monitoring and friend support) that are sources of risk and resilience to adolescent chronic illness self-management. In this article, we highlight literature consistent with the idea that self-regulation (including cognitive, emotional, and behavioral regulation) underlies both individual and interpersonal sources of risk and resilience across development. CONCLUSIONS: This self-regulation approach has multiple benefits: A parsimonious construct for explaining both individual and interpersonal processes that contribute to risk and resilience for chronic illness self-management, the incorporation of methods used in developmental and health psychology research, including performance-based, physiological, daily, and ecological momentary assessment, and a new look to interventions that target self-regulation as a way to improve individual and interpersonal processes in chronic illness self-management.
OBJECTIVE: To illustrate adolescent self-regulation as a foundation for both individual and interpersonal processes in adolescent chronic illness self-management. METHOD: Literature review. RESULTS: Research has identified multiple individual (e.g., self-efficacy, coping, and adherence) and interpersonal factors (parental monitoring and friend support) that are sources of risk and resilience to adolescent chronic illness self-management. In this article, we highlight literature consistent with the idea that self-regulation (including cognitive, emotional, and behavioral regulation) underlies both individual and interpersonal sources of risk and resilience across development. CONCLUSIONS: This self-regulation approach has multiple benefits: A parsimonious construct for explaining both individual and interpersonal processes that contribute to risk and resilience for chronic illness self-management, the incorporation of methods used in developmental and health psychology research, including performance-based, physiological, daily, and ecological momentary assessment, and a new look to interventions that target self-regulation as a way to improve individual and interpersonal processes in chronic illness self-management.
Authors: Avani C Modi; Ahna L Pai; Kevin A Hommel; Korey K Hood; Sandra Cortina; Marisa E Hilliard; Shanna M Guilfoyle; Wendy N Gray; Dennis Drotar Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Terrie E Moffitt; Louise Arseneault; Daniel Belsky; Nigel Dickson; Robert J Hancox; Honalee Harrington; Renate Houts; Richie Poulton; Brent W Roberts; Stephen Ross; Malcolm R Sears; W Murray Thomson; Avshalom Caspi Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-01-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Kelly McNally; Jennifer Rohan; Jennifer Shroff Pendley; Alan Delamater; Dennis Drotar Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2010-03-09 Impact factor: 17.152
Authors: Lawrence Fisher; Danielle Hessler; William Polonsky; Lisa Strycker; Susan Guzman; Vicky Bowyer; Ian Blumer; Umesh Masharani Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2017-07-08