Literature DB >> 25214205

Experience with a new device for pathological assessment of colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection.

A Trecca1, G Marinozzi, V Villanacci, M Salemme, G Bassotti.   

Abstract

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is gaining popularity worldwide in the treatment of neoplastic lesions of the gastrointestinal tract. However, the experience in Western countries is quite limited and restricted to large or academic centers. Besides, this approach requires an optimal pathological assessment. The aim of this study was to report our experience with colonic ESD using a new device that allows complete handling of the resected specimens and especially of lateral margins, for pathological analysis. In a 1-year period, 14 patients (6 men, 8 women, age range 50-82 years) underwent colonic ESD in a non-academic hospital. The endoscopic procedure was carried out successfully en bloc in more than 90 % of cases. Perforation requiring surgery occurred in one patient (7 %). Pathological assessment with the new device allowed entire and complete examination of both the deep and lateral margins of the excised specimens. Colonic ESD is a viable option for non-surgical treatment of large bowel lesions even in relatively small centers and in non-academic settings. The new device allows good handling of the specimens, and it seems to be useful for the entire examination of the resection margins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25214205     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-014-1213-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  22 in total

1.  Is it possible to improve the histological yield of oesophageal endoscopic mucosectomies?

Authors:  Vincenzo Villanacci; Gianpaolo Cengia; Renzo Cestari; Gabrio Bassotti
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 4.088

2.  A Western single-center experience with endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastrointestinal cancers.

Authors:  Sergio Coda; Paolo Trentino; Fabio Antonellis; Barbara Porowska; Francesco Gossetti; Franco Ruberto; Francesco Pugliese; Giulia D'Amati; Paolo Negro; Takuji Gotoda
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 3.  Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review.

Authors:  A Repici; C Hassan; D De Paula Pessoa; N Pagano; A Arezzo; A Zullo; R Lorenzetti; R Marmo
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 4.  Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: is it suitable in western countries?

Authors:  Toshio Uraoka; Adolfo Parra-Blanco; Naohisa Yahagi
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.029

Review 5.  Update on the paris classification of superficial neoplastic lesions in the digestive tract.

Authors: 
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Biospecimen reporting for improved study quality (BRISQ).

Authors:  Helen M Moore; Andrea B Kelly; Scott D Jewell; Lisa M McShane; Douglas P Clark; Renata Greenspan; Daniel F Hayes; Pierre Hainaut; Paula Kim; Elizabeth A Mansfield; Olga Potapova; Peter Riegman; Yaffa Rubinstein; Edward Seijo; Stella Somiari; Peter Watson; Heinz-Ulrich Weier; Claire Zhu; Jim Vaught
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Self-assembled hydro-jet system for submucosal elevation before endoscopic resection of nonpolypoid colorectal lesions (with video).

Authors:  Livio Cipolletta; Gianluca Rotondano; Maria A Bianco; Maria Lucia Garofano; Costantino Meucci; Antonio Prisco; Fabio Cipolletta; Roberto Piscopo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Rectal laterally spreading tumors successfully treated in two steps by endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection.

Authors:  Italo Stroppa; Giovanni Milito; Raffaella Lionetti; Giovanni Palmieri; Federica Cadeddu; Francesco Pallone
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  1,635 Endoscopic submucosal dissection cases in the esophagus, stomach, and colorectum: complication rates and long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Takashi Toyonaga; Mariko Man-i; James E East; Eisei Nishino; Wataru Ono; Tomoomi Hirooka; Chie Ueda; Yoshinori Iwata; Takeshi Sugiyama; Toshio Dozaiku; Takashi Hirooka; Tsuyoshi Fujita; Hideto Inokuchi; Takeshi Azuma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Indications for and technical aspects of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Yutaka Saito; Yosuke Otake; Taku Sakamoto; Takeshi Nakajima; Masayoshi Yamada; Shin Haruyama; Eriko So; Seiichiro Abe; Takahisa Matsuda
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.519

View more
  4 in total

1.  Optimal processing of ESD specimens to avoid pathological artifacts.

Authors:  L Reggiani Bonetti; R Manta; M Manno; R Conigliaro; G Missale; G Bassotti; V Villanacci
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Toward optimal processing of endoscopic submucosal dissection specimens.

Authors:  Vincenzo Villanacci; Gabrio Bassotti; Luca Reggiani Bonetti; Antonello Trecca; Moris Cadei
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Response to letter to the editor by Dr. Villanacci: toward optimal processing of endoscopic submucosal dissection specimens.

Authors:  Alicia Dessain; Christophe Snauwaert; Pamela Baldin; Pierre Deprez; Louis Libbrecht; Hubert Piessevaux; Anne Jouret-Mourin
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emmanuel Akintoye; Nitin Kumar; Hiroyuki Aihara; Hala Nas; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-09-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.