Literature DB >> 25214158

The importance of side marking in preventing surgical site errors.

Dvora Pikkel1, Adi Sharabi-Nov2, Joseph Pikkel3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Wrong site confusions are among the most common mistakes in operations of twosome organs.
PURPOSE: To examine the frequency of wrong sided confusions that could theoretically occur in various surgeries in the absence of preoperative verification.
METHODS: Ten cataract surgeons, twelve orthopedic surgeons and 6 ENT surgeons participated in the study. The surgeons were asked to fill a questionnaire that included their demographic data, occupational habits and their approach to and handling of patients preoperatively. On the day of operation the surgeons were asked to recognize the side of the operation from the patient's name only. At the second stage of the study, surgeons were asked to recognize the side of the operation while standing a two meter distance from the patient's face. Surgeons' answers were compared to the actual operation side. Patients then underwent a full "time out" procedure, which included side marking before the operation.
RESULTS: Of a total of 67 ophthalmic patients, 52 orthopedic patients and 26 ENT patients the surgeons correctly identified the operated side in 111 (76.5%) by name and in 126 (87%) by looking at patients' faces. Wrong side identification correlated with the time lapsed from the last preoperative examination (p = 0.034). The number of cataract surgeries performed by the same surgeon (on the same day) also correlated to the number of wrong identifications (p = 0.001) in ophthalmology. Orthopedic surgeons were more accurate in identifying the operated site Surgeon seniority or age did not correlate to the number of wrong identifications.
CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates the high error that can result in the absence of side marking prior to cataract surgery, as well as in operations on other twosome organs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Wrong site surgery; side marking; time out; wrong side surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25214158     DOI: 10.3233/JRS-140621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Risk Saf Med        ISSN: 0924-6479


  4 in total

1.  'Never Events in Surgery': Mere Error or an Avoidable Disaster.

Authors:  Jitendra Kumar; Rajni Raina
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 2.  Current issues in patient safety in surgery: a review.

Authors:  Fernando J Kim; Rodrigo Donalisio da Silva; Diedra Gustafson; Leticia Nogueira; Timothy Harlin; David L Paul
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2015-06-05

Review 3.  Models of teaching medical errors.

Authors:  Gassem Gohal
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

4.  Assessing clarity and erasability of commercially available pens for surgical site marking: a comparative study in human volunteers.

Authors:  F C J Sim; D Angadi; G E Jarvis; M Porteous
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2016-03-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.