Literature DB >> 25213870

Response patterns of recurrent glioblastomas treated with tumor-treating fields.

Josef Vymazal1, Eric T Wong2.   

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common form of primary malignant brain cancer. Median overall survival (OS) for newly diagnosed patients is only about 12 to 18 months. GBM tumors invariably recur, and there is no widely recognized and effective standard treatment for recurrent GBM. NovoTTF Therapy is a novel and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved antimitotic treatment for recurrent GBM with potential benefits compared with other options. Recurrent GBM patients from two prior trials with demonstrated radiologic tumor response to single-agent NovoTTF Therapy were analyzed to better characterize tumor response patterns and evaluate the associations between response, compliance, and OS. In addition, a compartmental tumor growth model was developed and evaluated for its ability to predict GBM response to tumor-treating fields (TTFields). The overall response rate across both trials was 15% (4% complete responses): 14% in the phase III trial (14/120) and 20% (2/10) in a pilot study. Tumor responses to NovoTTF Therapy developed slowly (median time to response, 5.2 months) but were durable (median duration, 12.9 months). Response duration was highly correlated with OS (r(2) = .92, P<.0001), and median OS for responders was 24.8 months. Seven of 16 responders exhibited initial tumor growth on magnetic resonance imaging. Compliance appeared to be linked with both improved response and survival. The tumor growth model predicted tumor arrest and shrinkage only after several weeks of continuous NovoTTF Therapy, consistent with the observed clinical findings of initial transient tumor growth in some patients. NovoTTF Therapy is a novel antimitotic treatment for recurrent GBM associated with slowly developing but durable tumor responses in approximately 15% of patients. Some responders exhibit initial tumor growth before shrinkage, indicating treatment should not be terminated prior to allowing for the full effect of NovoTTF Therapy to be realized. OS is longer in responders than in nonresponders. High daily compliance rates may be associated with increased likelihood of an objective response and are predictive of improved survival.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25213870     DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2014.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Oncol        ISSN: 0093-7754            Impact factor:   4.929


  19 in total

1.  Multisite Concordance of DSC-MRI Analysis for Brain Tumors: Results of a National Cancer Institute Quantitative Imaging Network Collaborative Project.

Authors:  K M Schmainda; M A Prah; S D Rand; Y Liu; B Logan; M Muzi; S D Rane; X Da; Y-F Yen; J Kalpathy-Cramer; T L Chenevert; B Hoff; B Ross; Y Cao; M P Aryal; B Erickson; P Korfiatis; T Dondlinger; L Bell; L Hu; P E Kinahan; C C Quarles
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  First report of tumor treating fields use in combination with bevacizumab in a pediatric patient: a case report.

Authors:  Daniel O'Connell; Violet Shen; William Loudon; Daniela A Bota
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2016-12-05

3.  Case of glioblastoma patient treated with tumor treating fields therapy at recurrence degenerating to sarcoma.

Authors:  Pejman Majd; Daniel E O'Connell; Ronald C Kim; Daniela A Bota; Jose A Carrillo
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2017-03-17

4.  Amino Acid PET Imaging of the Early Metabolic Response During Tumor-Treating Fields (TTFields) Therapy in Recurrent Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Edit Bosnyák; Geoffrey R Barger; Sharon K Michelhaugh; Natasha L Robinette; Alit Amit-Yousif; Sandeep Mittal; Csaba Juhász
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 7.794

5.  Complete radiological response following subtotal resection in three glioblastoma patients under treatment with Tumor Treating Fields.

Authors:  Almuth Friederike Kessler; Thomas Linsenmann; Thomas Westermaier; Wanja Wolber; Judith Weiland; Camelia-Maria Monoranu; Maria Breun; Carsten Hagemann; Ralf-Ingo Ernestus; Mario Löhr
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 6.  Tumor-Treating Fields for the treatment of glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ohad Regev; Vladimir Merkin; Deborah T Blumenthal; Israel Melamed; Tehila Kaisman-Elbaz
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2021-04-20

Review 7.  Neuro-oncology biotech industry progress report.

Authors:  Shamik Chakraborty; Imithri Bodhinayake; Amrit Chiluwal; David J Langer; Rosamaria Ruggieri; Marc Symons; John A Boockvar
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 4.506

Review 8.  The Evolving Role of Tumor Treating Fields in Managing Glioblastoma: Guide for Oncologists.

Authors:  Stuart H Burri; Vinai Gondi; Paul D Brown; Minesh P Mehta
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.339

9.  Tumor-treating fields elicit a conditional vulnerability to ionizing radiation via the downregulation of BRCA1 signaling and reduced DNA double-strand break repair capacity in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Narasimha Kumar Karanam; Kalayarasan Srinivasan; Lianghao Ding; Brock Sishc; Debabrata Saha; Michael D Story
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 8.469

10.  Enhancing Predicted Efficacy of Tumor Treating Fields Therapy of Glioblastoma Using Targeted Surgical Craniectomy: A Computer Modeling Study.

Authors:  Anders Rosendal Korshoej; Guilherme Bicalho Saturnino; Line Kirkegaard Rasmussen; Gorm von Oettingen; Jens Christian Hedemann Sørensen; Axel Thielscher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.