Daiva M Ragas1, Narissa J Nonzee2, Laura S Tom3, Ava M Phisuthikul1, Thanh Ha Luu1, XinQi Dong4, Melissa A Simon5. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. 2. Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. 3. Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. 4. Rush Institute for Healthy Aging, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois. 5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: m-simon2@northwestern.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The patient voice remains underrepresented in clinical and public health interventions. To inform interventions that strive to improve access to breast and cervical cancer screening and follow-up among low-income populations, we explored recommendations from low-income women pursuing health care in the safety net. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted among women receiving follow-up care for an abnormal breast or cervical cancer screening result or a positive cancer diagnosis in federally qualified health centers, free clinics, or an academic cancer center in the Chicago metropolitan area. FINDINGS: Of the 138 women interviewed in the parent study, 52 women provided recommendations for improving access to screening and follow-up care. Most were between 41 and 65 years old (62%) and African American (60%) or White (25%). Recommendations included strengthening community-based health education with more urgent messaging, strategic partnerships, and active learning experiences to increase patient engagement, which women regarded as a key driver of access. Women also suggested increasing access by way of changes to health care delivery systems and policy, including more direct patient-provider and patient-clinic communications, addressing delays caused by high patient volume, combining preventive services, expanding insurance coverage, and adjusting screening guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory study demonstrates important insights from the patient lens that may help to increase the acceptability and efficacy of community and clinical interventions aimed at improving access to breast and cervical cancer screening and follow-up. Further research is needed to identify appropriate integration of patient input into interventions, practice, and policy change.
BACKGROUND: The patient voice remains underrepresented in clinical and public health interventions. To inform interventions that strive to improve access to breast and cervical cancer screening and follow-up among low-income populations, we explored recommendations from low-income women pursuing health care in the safety net. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted among women receiving follow-up care for an abnormal breast or cervical cancer screening result or a positive cancer diagnosis in federally qualified health centers, free clinics, or an academic cancer center in the Chicago metropolitan area. FINDINGS: Of the 138 women interviewed in the parent study, 52 women provided recommendations for improving access to screening and follow-up care. Most were between 41 and 65 years old (62%) and African American (60%) or White (25%). Recommendations included strengthening community-based health education with more urgent messaging, strategic partnerships, and active learning experiences to increase patient engagement, which women regarded as a key driver of access. Women also suggested increasing access by way of changes to health care delivery systems and policy, including more direct patient-provider and patient-clinic communications, addressing delays caused by high patient volume, combining preventive services, expanding insurance coverage, and adjusting screening guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory study demonstrates important insights from the patient lens that may help to increase the acceptability and efficacy of community and clinical interventions aimed at improving access to breast and cervical cancer screening and follow-up. Further research is needed to identify appropriate integration of patient input into interventions, practice, and policy change.
Authors: Linda B Squiers; Debra J Holden; Suzanne E Dolina; Annice E Kim; Carla M Bann; Jeanette M Renaud Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Judith Swan; Nancy Breen; Barry I Graubard; Timothy S McNeel; Donald Blackman; Florence K Tangka; Rachel Ballard-Barbash Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-10-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Julia R Trosman; Ruth C Carlos; Melissa A Simon; Debra L Madden; William J Gradishar; Al B Benson; Bruce D Rapkin; Elisa S Weiss; Ilana F Gareen; Lynne I Wagner; Seema A Khan; Mikele M Bunce; Art Small; Christine B Weldon Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2016-10-31 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Jonah Musa; Chad J Achenbach; Charlesnika T Evans; Neil Jordan; Patrick H Daru; Lifang Hou; Robert L Murphy; Isaac F Adewole; Melissa A Simon Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2018-11-22 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Marjolein Dieleman; Jolien de Waard; G Bea A Wisman; Ed Schuuring; Martha D Esajas; Karin M Vermeulen; Geertruida H de Bock Journal: Patient Date: 2021-09-24 Impact factor: 3.883
Authors: Elena Riza; Argiro Karakosta; Thomas Tsiampalis; Despoina Lazarou; Angeliki Karachaliou; Spyridon Ntelis; Vasilios Karageorgiou; Theodora Psaltopoulou Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-21 Impact factor: 3.390