Literature DB >> 25213744

What women want: patient recommendations for improving access to breast and cervical cancer screening and follow-up.

Daiva M Ragas1, Narissa J Nonzee2, Laura S Tom3, Ava M Phisuthikul1, Thanh Ha Luu1, XinQi Dong4, Melissa A Simon5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The patient voice remains underrepresented in clinical and public health interventions. To inform interventions that strive to improve access to breast and cervical cancer screening and follow-up among low-income populations, we explored recommendations from low-income women pursuing health care in the safety net.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted among women receiving follow-up care for an abnormal breast or cervical cancer screening result or a positive cancer diagnosis in federally qualified health centers, free clinics, or an academic cancer center in the Chicago metropolitan area.
FINDINGS: Of the 138 women interviewed in the parent study, 52 women provided recommendations for improving access to screening and follow-up care. Most were between 41 and 65 years old (62%) and African American (60%) or White (25%). Recommendations included strengthening community-based health education with more urgent messaging, strategic partnerships, and active learning experiences to increase patient engagement, which women regarded as a key driver of access. Women also suggested increasing access by way of changes to health care delivery systems and policy, including more direct patient-provider and patient-clinic communications, addressing delays caused by high patient volume, combining preventive services, expanding insurance coverage, and adjusting screening guidelines.
CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory study demonstrates important insights from the patient lens that may help to increase the acceptability and efficacy of community and clinical interventions aimed at improving access to breast and cervical cancer screening and follow-up. Further research is needed to identify appropriate integration of patient input into interventions, practice, and policy change.
Copyright © 2014 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25213744      PMCID: PMC4840460          DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Womens Health Issues        ISSN: 1049-3867


  37 in total

1.  Evidence that consumers are skeptical about evidence-based health care.

Authors:  Kristin L Carman; Maureen Maurer; Jill Mathews Yegian; Pamela Dardess; Jeanne McGee; Mark Evers; Karen O Marlo
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients.

Authors:  Angela Coulter; Jo Ellins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-07-07

3.  Addressing disparities and achieving equity: cultural competence, ethics, and health-care transformation.

Authors:  Joseph R Betancourt; James Corbett; Matthew R Bondaryk
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  The public's response to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force's 2009 recommendations on mammography screening.

Authors:  Linda B Squiers; Debra J Holden; Suzanne E Dolina; Annice E Kim; Carla M Bann; Jeanette M Renaud
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 5.  Improving nutrition and physical activity in the workplace: a meta-analysis of intervention studies.

Authors:  Amanda D Hutchinson; Carlene Wilson
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 2.483

6.  Health care strategies to promote earlier presentation of symptomatic breast cancer: perspectives of women and family physicians.

Authors:  R Heisey; M Clemons; L Granek; K Fergus; S Hum; B Lord; D R McCready; B Fitzgerald
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Data and trends in cancer screening in the United States: results from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Judith Swan; Nancy Breen; Barry I Graubard; Timothy S McNeel; Donald Blackman; Florence K Tangka; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Differences in health and cultural beliefs by stage of mammography screening adoption in African American women.

Authors:  Kathleen M Russell; Patrick Monahan; Ann Wagle; Victoria Champion
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Empowering patients through social media: the benefits and challenges.

Authors:  Mowafa Househ; Elizabeth Borycki; Andre Kushniruk
Journal:  Health Informatics J       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  Timeliness of abnormal screening and diagnostic mammography follow-up at facilities serving vulnerable women.

Authors:  L Elizabeth Goldman; Rod Walker; Rebecca Hubbard; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  7 in total

1.  A Community-Based Outreach Navigator Approach to Establishing Partnerships for a Safety Net Mammography Screening Center.

Authors:  Sherrie Wallington; Bridget Oppong; Chiranjeev Dash; Tesha Coleman; Holly Greenwald; Tanya Torres; Marquita Iddirisu; Lucile Lauren Adams-Campbell
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Care for a Patient With Cancer As a Project: Management of Complex Task Interdependence in Cancer Care Delivery.

Authors:  Julia R Trosman; Ruth C Carlos; Melissa A Simon; Debra L Madden; William J Gradishar; Al B Benson; Bruce D Rapkin; Elisa S Weiss; Ilana F Gareen; Lynne I Wagner; Seema A Khan; Mikele M Bunce; Art Small; Christine B Weldon
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Association between patient-reported HIV status and provider recommendation for screening in an opportunistic cervical Cancer screening setting in Jos, Nigeria.

Authors:  Jonah Musa; Chad J Achenbach; Charlesnika T Evans; Neil Jordan; Patrick H Daru; Lifang Hou; Robert L Murphy; Isaac F Adewole; Melissa A Simon
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 4.  Preferences and Experiences Regarding the Use of the Self-Sampling Device in hrHPV Screening for Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Marjolein Dieleman; Jolien de Waard; G Bea A Wisman; Ed Schuuring; Martha D Esajas; Karin M Vermeulen; Geertruida H de Bock
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Association Between Social Engagement and Cancer Screening Utilization in a Community-Dwelling Chinese American Older Population.

Authors:  Ailian Hei; XinQi Dong
Journal:  Gerontol Geriatr Med       Date:  2018-07-17

6.  Impact of Health Information Prescription on Self-care of Women with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Masoomeh Latifi; Nader Alishan Karami; Mozhdeh Beiraghdar; Fatemeh Maraki; Leili Allahbakhshian Farsani
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2018-10-31

7.  Knowledge, Attitudes and Perceptions about Cervical Cancer Risk, Prevention and Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) in Vulnerable Women in Greece.

Authors:  Elena Riza; Argiro Karakosta; Thomas Tsiampalis; Despoina Lazarou; Angeliki Karachaliou; Spyridon Ntelis; Vasilios Karageorgiou; Theodora Psaltopoulou
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.