Literature DB >> 25213708

Using drug response data to identify molecular effectors, and molecular "omic" data to identify candidate drugs in cancer.

William C Reinhold1, Sudhir Varma, Vinodh N Rajapakse, Augustin Luna, Fabricio Garmus Sousa, Kurt W Kohn, Yves G Pommier.   

Abstract

The current convergence of molecular and pharmacological data provides unprecedented opportunities to gain insights into the relationships between the two types of data. Multiple forms of large-scale molecular data, including but not limited to gene and microRNA transcript expression, DNA somatic and germline variations from next-generation DNA and RNA sequencing, and DNA copy number from array comparative genomic hybridization are all potentially informative when one attempts to recognize the panoply of potentially influential events both for cancer progression and therapeutic outcome. Concurrently, there has also been a substantial expansion of the pharmacological data being accrued in a systematic fashion. For cancer cell lines, the National Cancer Institute cell line panel (NCI-60), the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE), and the collaborative Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) databases all provide subsets of these forms of data. For the patient-derived data, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) provides analogous forms of genomic information along with treatment histories. Integration of these data in turn relies on the fields of statistics and statistical learning. Multiple algorithmic approaches may be chosen, depending on the data being considered, and the nature of the question being asked. Combining these algorithms with prior biological knowledge, the results of molecular biological studies, and the consideration of genes as pathways or functional groups provides both the challenge and the potential of the field. The ultimate goal is to provide a paradigm shift in the way that drugs are selected to provide a more targeted and efficacious outcome for the patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25213708      PMCID: PMC4282979          DOI: 10.1007/s00439-014-1482-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  69 in total

1.  Molecular interaction maps as information organizers and simulation guides.

Authors:  Kurt W. Kohn
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.642

2.  Connecting chemosensitivity, gene expression and disease.

Authors:  David G Covell
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 14.819

3.  Genome-wide mRNA and microRNA profiling of the NCI 60 cell-line screen and comparison of FdUMP[10] with fluorouracil, floxuridine, and topoisomerase 1 poisons.

Authors:  William H Gmeiner; William C Reinhold; Yves Pommier
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.261

4.  Predicting drug sensitivity and resistance: profiling ABC transporter genes in cancer cells.

Authors:  Gergely Szakács; Jean-Philippe Annereau; Samir Lababidi; Uma Shankavaram; Angela Arciello; Kimberly J Bussey; William Reinhold; Yanping Guo; Gary D Kruh; Mark Reimers; John N Weinstein; Michael M Gottesman
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 31.743

5.  Reactome: a database of reactions, pathways and biological processes.

Authors:  David Croft; Gavin O'Kelly; Guanming Wu; Robin Haw; Marc Gillespie; Lisa Matthews; Michael Caudy; Phani Garapati; Gopal Gopinath; Bijay Jassal; Steven Jupe; Irina Kalatskaya; Shahana Mahajan; Bruce May; Nelson Ndegwa; Esther Schmidt; Veronica Shamovsky; Christina Yung; Ewan Birney; Henning Hermjakob; Peter D'Eustachio; Lincoln Stein
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Collections of simultaneously altered genes as biomarkers of cancer cell drug response.

Authors:  David L Masica; Rachel Karchin
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 7.  Personalized cancer therapy with selective kinase inhibitors: an emerging paradigm in medical oncology.

Authors:  Ultan McDermott; Jeff Settleman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Mass homozygotes accumulation in the NCI-60 cancer cell lines as compared to HapMap Trios, and relation to fragile site location.

Authors:  Xiaoyang Ruan; Jean-Pierre A Kocher; Yves Pommier; Hongfang Liu; William C Reinhold
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Depicting combinatorial complexity with the molecular interaction map notation.

Authors:  Kurt W Kohn; Mirit I Aladjem; Sohyoung Kim; John N Weinstein; Yves Pommier
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 11.429

10.  CellMiner: a relational database and query tool for the NCI-60 cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Uma T Shankavaram; Sudhir Varma; David Kane; Margot Sunshine; Krishna K Chary; William C Reinhold; Yves Pommier; John N Weinstein
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Functional genomics to uncover drug mechanism of action.

Authors:  Sebastian M B Nijman
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 15.040

2.  rcellminer: exploring molecular profiles and drug response of the NCI-60 cell lines in R.

Authors:  Augustin Luna; Vinodh N Rajapakse; Fabricio G Sousa; Jianjiong Gao; Nikolaus Schultz; Sudhir Varma; William Reinhold; Chris Sander; Yves Pommier
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 3.  Preclinical mouse cancer models: a maze of opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Chi-Ping Day; Glenn Merlino; Terry Van Dyke
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Current dichotomy between traditional molecular biological and omic research in cancer biology and pharmacology.

Authors:  William C Reinhold
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-10

Review 5.  The pro-tumorigenic host response to cancer therapies.

Authors:  Yuval Shaked
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Estimating Potency in High-Throughput Screening Experiments by Maximizing the Rate of Change in Weighted Shannon Entropy.

Authors:  Keith R Shockley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Identification of phenocopies improves prediction of targeted therapy response over DNA mutations alone.

Authors:  Hamza Bakhtiar; Kyle T Helzer; Yeonhee Park; Yi Chen; Nicholas R Rydzewski; Matthew L Bootsma; Yue Shi; Paul M Harari; Marina Sharifi; Martin Sjöström; Joshua M Lang; Menggang Yu; Shuang G Zhao
Journal:  NPJ Genom Med       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 6.083

8.  A pan-cancer study of the transcriptional regulation of uricogenesis in human tumours: pathological and pharmacological correlates.

Authors:  Zuzana Saidak; Christophe Louandre; Samy Dahmani; Chloé Sauzay; Sara Guedda; Bruno Chauffert; Denis Chatelain; Irene Ceballos-Picot; Antoine Galmiche
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.840

9.  Sequential analysis of transcript expression patterns improves survival prediction in multiple cancers.

Authors:  Jordan Mandel; Raghunandan Avula; Edward V Prochownik
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 4.430

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.