M Gram1, C Graversen2, S S Olesen1, A M Drewes3. 1. Mech-Sense, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark. 2. Mech-Sense, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; Mech-Sense, Department of Radiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark. 3. Mech-Sense, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; Center for Sensory-Motor Interactions (SMI), Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Denmark. Electronic address: amd@mech-sense.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate reliability of electroencephalography (EEG) during rest and tonic pain. Furthermore, changes in EEG between the two states as well as dynamics and relation to pain ratings were investigated. METHODS: On two separate days EEG was recorded in 39 subjects during rest and tonic pain (cold pressor test: left hand held in 2°C water for 2 min.) while pain intensity was rated continuously. Dynamic spectral analysis was performed on the EEG. Between-day reliability of spectral indices was assessed and correlations to pain ratings were investigated. RESULTS: EEG reliability was high during both states. The relative spectral indices increased in delta (1-4 Hz; P=0.0002), beta3 (18-32 Hz; P<0.0001) and gamma (32-70 Hz; P<0.0001) bands during tonic pain, and decreased in theta (4-8 Hz; P<0.0001), alpha1 (8-10 Hz; P<0.0001), alpha2 (10-12 Hz; P<0.0001) bands. Theta, beta3 and gamma bands correlated significantly to the area-under-curve of pain ratings, but only theta was dynamic and correlated to the pain ratings (R=0.88, P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: EEG assessed during tonic pain is a valid experimental pain model both in terms of reliability between days and in connection between cortical activity and pain perception. SIGNIFICANCE: EEG during tonic pain is more pain-specific and should be used in future basic and pharmacological studies.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate reliability of electroencephalography (EEG) during rest and tonic pain. Furthermore, changes in EEG between the two states as well as dynamics and relation to pain ratings were investigated. METHODS: On two separate days EEG was recorded in 39 subjects during rest and tonic pain (cold pressor test: left hand held in 2°C water for 2 min.) while pain intensity was rated continuously. Dynamic spectral analysis was performed on the EEG. Between-day reliability of spectral indices was assessed and correlations to pain ratings were investigated. RESULTS: EEG reliability was high during both states. The relative spectral indices increased in delta (1-4 Hz; P=0.0002), beta3 (18-32 Hz; P<0.0001) and gamma (32-70 Hz; P<0.0001) bands during tonic pain, and decreased in theta (4-8 Hz; P<0.0001), alpha1 (8-10 Hz; P<0.0001), alpha2 (10-12 Hz; P<0.0001) bands. Theta, beta3 and gamma bands correlated significantly to the area-under-curve of pain ratings, but only theta was dynamic and correlated to the pain ratings (R=0.88, P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: EEG assessed during tonic pain is a valid experimental pain model both in terms of reliability between days and in connection between cortical activity and pain perception. SIGNIFICANCE: EEG during tonic pain is more pain-specific and should be used in future basic and pharmacological studies.
Authors: Paul E Rapp; David O Keyser; Alfonso Albano; Rene Hernandez; Douglas B Gibson; Robert A Zambon; W David Hairston; John D Hughes; Andrew Krystal; Andrew S Nichols Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2015-02-04 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Mikkel Gram; Joachim Erlenwein; Frank Petzke; Deborah Falla; Michael Przemeck; Miriam I Emons; Michael Reuster; Søren S Olesen; Asbjørn M Drewes Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-10-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Moritz M Nickel; Elisabeth S May; Laura Tiemann; Paul Schmidt; Martina Postorino; Son Ta Dinh; Joachim Gross; Markus Ploner Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2017-01-07 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Moritz M Nickel; Son Ta Dinh; Elisabeth S May; Laura Tiemann; Vanessa D Hohn; Joachim Gross; Markus Ploner Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2019-09-09 Impact factor: 5.399