Literature DB >> 25213286

Potential risk of biochar-amended soil to aquatic systems: an evaluation based on aquatic bioassays.

A C Bastos1, M Prodana, N Abrantes, J J Keizer, A M V M Soares, S Loureiro.   

Abstract

It is vital to address potential risks to aquatic ecosystems exposed to runoff and leachates from biochar-amended soils, before large scale applications can be considered. So far, there are no established approaches for such an assessment. This study used a battery of bioassays and representative aquatic organisms for assessing the acute toxicity of water-extractable fractions of biochar-amended soil, at reported application rates (80 t ha(-1)). Biochar-amended aqueous soil extracts contained cadmium (Cd), cobalt (Co), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), manganese (Mn), zinc (Zn), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), arsenic (As) and mercury (Hg) (Σmetals 96.3 µg l(-1)) as well as the 16 priority PAHs defined by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Σ16PAHs 106 ng l(-1)) at contents in the range of current EU regulations for surface waters. Nevertheless, acute exposure to soil-biochar (SB) extracts resulted in species-specific effects and dose-response patterns. While the bioluminescent marine bacterium Vibrio fischeri was the most sensitive organism to aqueous SB extracts, there were no effects on the growth of the microalgae Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. In contrast, up to 20 and 25% mobility impairment was obtained for the invertebrate Daphnia magna upon exposure to 50 and 100% SB extract concentrations (respectively). Results suggest that a battery of rapid and cost-effective aquatic bioassays that account for ecological representation can complement analytical characterization of biochar-amended soils and risk assessment approaches for surface and groundwater protection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25213286     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-014-1344-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  37 in total

Review 1.  Underlying issues in bioaccessibility and bioavailability: experimental methods.

Authors:  K Hund-Rinke; W Kördel
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.291

2.  Water-extractable priority contaminants in LUFA 2.2 soil: back to basics, contextualisation and implications for use as natural standard soil.

Authors:  A C Bastos; M Prodana; J M M Oliveira; C F Calhôa; M J G Santos; A M V M Soares; S Loureiro
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Effect of sediment turbidity and color on light output measurement for Microtox Basic Solid-Phase Test.

Authors:  T Campisi; F Abbondanzi; C Casado-Martinez; T A DelValls; R Guerra; A Iacondini
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.086

4.  Elements uptake by metal accumulator species grown on mine tailings amended with three types of biochar.

Authors:  G Fellet; M Marmiroli; L Marchiol
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Screening for soil toxicity and mutagenicity using luminescent bacteria--a case study of the explosive 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT).

Authors:  Tobias Frische
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.291

6.  The water-soluble fraction of potentially toxic elements in contaminated soils: relationships between ecotoxicity, solubility and geochemical reactivity.

Authors:  L Rocha; S M Rodrigues; I Lopes; A M V M Soares; A C Duarte; E Pereira
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 7.086

7.  Quantifying the total and bioavailable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and dioxins in biochars.

Authors:  Sarah E Hale; Johannes Lehmann; David Rutherford; Andrew R Zimmerman; Robert T Bachmann; Victor Shitumbanuma; Adam O'Toole; Kristina L Sundqvist; Hans Peter H Arp; Gerard Cornelissen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Reduced bioaccumulation of PAHs by Lactuca satuva L. grown in contaminated soil amended with sewage sludge and sewage sludge derived biochar.

Authors:  Sardar Khan; Ning Wang; Brian J Reid; Alessia Freddo; Chao Cai
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 8.071

9.  Toxicity testing of 16 priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons using Lumistox.

Authors:  Andreas P Loibner; Oliver H J Szolar; Rudolf Braun; Doris Hirmann
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.742

10.  Assessment of the toxicity of mixtures of copper, 9,10-phenanthrenequinone, and phenanthrene to Daphnia magna: evidence for a reactive oxygen mechanism.

Authors:  Fangli Xie; Stephen A Koziar; Mark A Lampi; D George Dixon; Norwood P Warren; Uwe Borgmann; Xiao-Dong Huang; Bruce M Greenberg
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.742

View more
  6 in total

1.  Decrease in the genotoxicity of metal-contaminated soils with biochar amendments.

Authors:  Frédéric Rees; Adrien Dhyèvre; Jean Louis Morel; Sylvie Cotelle
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Biochar can mitigate co-selection and control antibiotic resistant genes (ARGs) in compost and soil.

Authors:  Chisom Ejileugha
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-05-27

3.  The influence of sunlight and oxidative treatment on measured PAH concentrations in biochar.

Authors:  Fathima N M Khalid; Doug Klarup
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 4.  Feasibility of biochar application on a landfill final cover-a review on balancing ecology and shallow slope stability.

Authors:  Xun-Wen Chen; James Tsz-Fung Wong; Charles Wang-Wai Ng; Ming-Hung Wong
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Combination of biochar amendment and phytoremediation for hydrocarbon removal in petroleum-contaminated soil.

Authors:  Tao Han; Zhipeng Zhao; Mark Bartlam; Yingying Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 6.  Post-processing of biochars to enhance plant growth responses: a review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sean C Thomas
Journal:  Biochar       Date:  2021-08-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.