Literature DB >> 25213192

Empirical Bayes Gaussian likelihood estimation of exposure distributions from pooled samples in human biomonitoring.

Xiang Li1, Anthony Y C Kuk, Jinfeng Xu.   

Abstract

Human biomonitoring of exposure to environmental chemicals is important. Individual monitoring is not viable because of low individual exposure level or insufficient volume of materials and the prohibitive cost of taking measurements from many subjects. Pooling of samples is an efficient and cost-effective way to collect data. Estimation is, however, complicated as individual values within each pool are not observed but are only known up to their average or weighted average. The distribution of such averages is intractable when the individual measurements are lognormally distributed, which is a common assumption. We propose to replace the intractable distribution of the pool averages by a Gaussian likelihood to obtain parameter estimates. If the pool size is large, this method produces statistically efficient estimates, but regardless of pool size, the method yields consistent estimates as the number of pools increases. An empirical Bayes (EB) Gaussian likelihood approach, as well as its Bayesian analog, is developed to pool information from various demographic groups by using a mixed-effect formulation. We also discuss methods to estimate the underlying mean-variance relationship and to select a good model for the means, which can be incorporated into the proposed EB or Bayes framework. By borrowing strength across groups, the EB estimator is more efficient than the individual group-specific estimator. Simulation results show that the EB Gaussian likelihood estimates outperform a previous method proposed for the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys with much smaller bias and better coverage in interval estimation, especially after correction of bias.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gaussian likelihood; bias correction; biomonitoring; empirical Bayes estimation; lognormal distribution; pooled samples

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25213192     DOI: 10.1002/sim.6304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  2 in total

1.  Confidence interval estimation for pooled-sample biomonitoring from a complex survey design.

Authors:  Samuel P Caudill
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 9.621

2.  Varying-coefficient regression analysis for pooled biomonitoring.

Authors:  Dewei Wang; Xichen Mou; Yan Liu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.571

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.