Literature DB >> 25212528

Induction chemoradiation therapy prior to esophagectomy is associated with superior long-term survival for esophageal cancer.

P J Speicher1, X Wang2, B R Englum1, A M Ganapathi1, B Yerokun1, M G Hartwig1, T A D'Amico1, M F Berry1,3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the role of induction chemoradiation in the treatment of potentially resectable locally advanced (T2-3N0 and T1-3N+) esophageal cancer utilizing a large national database. The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried for all patients undergoing esophagectomy for clinical T2-3N0 and T1-3N+ esophageal cancer of the mid- or lower esophagus. Patients were stratified by the use of induction chemoradiation therapy versus surgery-first. Trends were assessed with the Cochran-Armitage test. Predictors of receiving induction therapy were evaluated with multivariable logistic regression. A propensity-matched analysis was conducted to compare outcomes between groups, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate long-term survival. Within the NCDB, 7921 patients were identified, of which 6103 (77.0%) were treated with chemoradiation prior to esophagectomy, while the remaining 1818 (23.0%) were managed with surgery-first. Use of induction therapy increased over time, with an absolute increase of 11.8% from 2003-2011 (P < 0.001). As revealed by the propensity model, induction therapy was associated with higher rates of negative margins and shorter hospital length of stay, but no differences in unplanned readmission and 30-day mortality rates. In unadjusted survival analysis, induction therapy was associated with better long-term survival compared to a strategy of surgery-first, with 5-year survival rates of 37.2% versus 28.6%, P < 0.001. Following propensity score matching analysis, the use of induction therapy maintained a significant survival advantage over surgery-first (5-year survival: 37.9% vs. 28.7%, P < 0.001). Treatment with induction chemoradiation therapy prior to surgical resection is associated with significant improvement in long-term survival, even after adjusting for confounders with a propensity model. Induction therapy should be considered in all medically appropriate patients with resectable cT2-3N0 and cT1-3N+ esophageal cancer, prior to esophagectomy.
© 2014 International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  National Cancer Database; esophageal cancer; esophageal surgery; induction therapy; outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25212528      PMCID: PMC4362812          DOI: 10.1111/dote.12285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  22 in total

1.  T2N0M0 esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Thomas W Rice; David P Mason; Sudish C Murthy; Gregory Zuccaro; David J Adelstein; Lisa A Rybicki; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Effects of neoadjuvant therapy on perioperative morbidity in elderly patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Alberto Ruol; Giuseppe Portale; Carlo Castoro; Stefano Merigliano; Matteo Cagol; Francesco Cavallin; Vanna Chiarion Sileni; Luigi Corti; Sabrina Rampado; Mario Costantini; Ermanno Ancona
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone in squamous-cell cancer of the esophagus.

Authors:  J F Bosset; M Gignoux; J P Triboulet; E Tiret; G Mantion; D Elias; P Lozach; J C Ollier; J J Pavy; M Mercier; T Sahmoud
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-07-17       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Combined modality therapy of cT2N0M0 esophageal cancer: the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.

Authors:  Panteleimon Kountourakis; Arlene M Correa; Wayne L Hofstetter; Jeffrey H Lee; Manoop S Bhutani; David C Rice; Ritsuko Komaki; Dipen M Maru; William A Ross; Ara Vaporciyan; Stephen G Swisher; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  A comparison of multimodal therapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  T N Walsh; N Noonan; D Hollywood; A Kelly; N Keeling; T P Hennessy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for resectable cancer of the oesophagus: a randomised controlled phase III trial.

Authors:  Bryan H Burmeister; B Mark Smithers; Val Gebski; Lara Fitzgerald; R John Simes; Peter Devitt; Stephen Ackland; David C Gotley; David Joseph; Jeremy Millar; John North; Euan T Walpole; James W Denham
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  The roles of neoadjuvant radiotherapy and lymphadenectomy in the treatment of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Naveenraj Solomon; Ying Zhuge; Michael Cheung; Dido Franceschi; Leonidas G Koniaris
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Survival effect of neoadjuvant radiotherapy before esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end-results study.

Authors:  Amanda L Schwer; Ari Ballonoff; Robert McCammon; Kyle Rusthoven; Ralph B D'Agostino; Tracey E Schefter
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 9.  Concurrent radiation therapy and chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy for localized esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  B A Bates; F C Detterbeck; S A Bernard; B F Qaqish; J E Tepper
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Phase III trial of trimodality therapy with cisplatin, fluorouracil, radiotherapy, and surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer: CALGB 9781.

Authors:  Joel Tepper; Mark J Krasna; Donna Niedzwiecki; Donna Hollis; Carolyn E Reed; Richard Goldberg; Krystyna Kiel; Christopher Willett; David Sugarbaker; Robert Mayer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  6 in total

1.  Impact of Positive Margins on Survival in Patients Undergoing Esophagogastrectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey Javidfar; Paul J Speicher; Matthew G Hartwig; Thomas A D'Amico; Mark F Berry
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Pathologic Complete Response Is an Independent Predictor of Improved Survival Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Raed M Alnaji; William Du; Emmanuel Gabriel; Smit Singla; Kristopher Attwood; Hector Nava; Usha Malhotra; Steven N Hochwald; Moshim Kukar
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Patterns and predictors of failure following tri-modality therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Talha Shaikh; Mark A Zaki; Michael M Dominello; Elizabeth Handorf; Andre A Konski; Steven J Cohen; Anthony Shields; Philip Philip; Joshua E Meyer
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.089

4.  Association Between Clinically Staged Node-Negative Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and Overall Survival Benefit From Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation.

Authors:  Emmanuel Gabriel; Kristopher Attwood; William Du; Rebecca Tuttle; Raed M Alnaji; Steven Nurkin; Usha Malhotra; Steven N Hochwald; Moshim Kukar
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 14.766

5.  Patterns of Use of Induction Therapy for T2N0 Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Kristen E Rhodin; Vignesh Raman; Oliver K Jawitz; Soraya L Voigt; Norma E Farrow; David H Harpole; Betty C Tong; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 6.  Remnant lymph node metastases after neoadjuvant therapy and surgery in patients with pathologic T0 esophageal carcinoma impact on prognosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hong-Wei Lv; Yin Li; Mei-Hong Zhou; Ji-Wei Cheng; Wen-Qun Xing
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.889

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.