Literature DB >> 25212115

Is it possible to predict office hysteroscopy failure?

Luigi Cobellis1, Maria Antonietta Castaldi2, Valentino Giordano1, Pasquale De Franciscis1, Giuseppe Signoriello3, Nicola Colacurci1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a clinical tool, the HFI (Hysteroscopy Failure Index), which gives criteria to predict hysteroscopic examination failure. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a retrospective diagnostic test study, aimed to validate the HFI, set at the Department of Gynaecology, Obstetric and Reproductive Science of the Second University of Naples, Italy. The HFI was applied to our database of 995 consecutive women, who underwent office based to assess abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), infertility, cervical polyps, and abnormal sonographic patterns (postmenopausal endometrial thickness of more than 5mm, endometrial hyperechogenic spots, irregular endometrial line, suspect of uterine septa). Demographic characteristics, previous surgery, recurrent infections, sonographic data, Estro-Progestins, IUD and menopausal status were collected. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the ability of the model to identify patients who were correctly identified (true positives) divided by the total number of failed hysteroscopies (true positives+false negatives). Positive and Negative Likelihood Ratios with 95%CI were calculated.
RESULTS: The HFI score is able to predict office hysteroscopy failure in 76% of cases. Moreover, the Positive likelihood ratio was 11.37 (95% CI: 8.49-15.21), and the Negative likelihood ratio was 0.33 (95% CI: 0.27-0.41).
CONCLUSION: Hysteroscopy failure index was able to retrospectively predict office hysteroscopy failure.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hysteroscopy failure; Infertility; Mathematical model; Office hysteroscopy; Statistics

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25212115     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  2 in total

1.  Does "no-touch" technique hysteroscopy increase the risk of infection?

Authors:  Evrim Ebru Kovalak
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-06-27

Review 2.  Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in Perimenopausal Women: The Role of Hysteroscopy and Its Impact on Quality of Life and Sexuality.

Authors:  Salvatore Giovanni Vitale; Rafał Watrowski; Fabio Barra; Maurizio Nicola D'Alterio; Jose Carugno; Thozhukat Sathyapalan; Ilker Kahramanoglu; Enrique Reyes-Muñoz; Li-Te Lin; Bulent Urman; Simone Ferrero; Stefano Angioni
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.