Literature DB >> 25211606

A retrospective study using the pressure ulcer scale for healing (PUSH) tool to examine factors affecting stage II pressure ulcer healing in a Korean acute care hospital.

Kyung Hee Park1.   

Abstract

Stage II pressure ulcers (PUs) should be managed promptly and appropriately in order to prevent complications. To identify the factors affecting Stage II PU healing and optimize care, the electronic medical records of patients with a Stage II PU in an acute care hospital were examined. Patient and ulcer characteristics as well as nutritional assessment variables were retrieved, and ulcer variables were used to calculate Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) scores. The effect of all variables on healing status (healed versus nonhealed) and change in PUSH score for healing rate were compared. Records of 309 Stage II PUs from 155 patients (mean age 61.2 ± 15.2 [range 5-89] years, 182 [58.9%] male) were retrieved and analyzed. Of those, 221 healed and 88 were documented as not healed at the end of the study. The variables that were significantly different between patients with PUs that did and did not heal were: major diagnosis (P = 0.001), peripheral arterial disease (P = 0.007), smoking (P = 0.048), serum albumin ( <2.5 g/dL) (P = 0.002), antidepressant use (P = 0.035), vitamin use (P = 0.006), history of surgery (P <0.001), PU size (P = 0.003), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) score (P = 0.020), Braden scale score (P = 0.003), and mean arterial pressure (MAP, mm Hg) (P = 0.026). The Cox proportional hazard model showed a significant positive difference in PUSH score change -indicative of healing - when pressure-redistribution surfaces were used (P <0.001, HR = 2.317), PU size was small (≤3.0 cm2, P = 0.006, HR = 1.670), MAP (within a range of 52-112 mm Hg) was higher P = 0.010, HR = 1.016), and patients were provided multivitamins (P = 0.037, HR=1.431). The results of this study suggest strategies for healing Stage II PUs in the acute care setting should include early recognition of lower-stage PUs, the provision of static pressure-redistribution surfaces and multivitamins, and maintaining higher MAP may facilitate healing and prevent deterioration. Further prospective research is warranted to verify the effect of these interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25211606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage        ISSN: 0889-5899            Impact factor:   2.629


  4 in total

1.  The Association between Malnutrition and Pressure Ulcers in Elderly in Long-Term Care Facility.

Authors:  Lenche Neloska; Katerina Damevska; Andjelka Nikolchev; Lidija Pavleska; Biljana Petreska-Zovic; Milenko Kostov
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2016-08-22

2.  Potential prognostic factors for delayed healing of common, non-traumatic skin ulcers: A scoping review.

Authors:  David A Jenkins; Sundus Mohamed; Joanne K Taylor; Niels Peek; Sabine N van der Veer
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Relationship between Braden Scale scores and acute kidney injury among patients with acute coronary syndrome: a multicentre retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Zhichao Li; Bofu Liu; Dongze Li; Yu Jia; Lei Ye; Xiaoyang Liao; Zhi Zeng; Zhi Wan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Epidermal grafting versus split-thickness skin grafting for wound healing (EPIGRAAFT): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Muholan Kanapathy; Nadine Hachach-Haram; Nicola Bystrzonowski; Keith Harding; Afshin Mosahebi; Toby Richards
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 2.279

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.