The concise, enantioselective total syntheses of (-)-citrinadin A and (+)-citrinadin B in a total of only 20 and 21 steps, respectively, from commercially available starting materials are described. Our strategy, which minimizes refunctionalization and protection/deprotection operations, features the highly diastereoselective, vinylogous Mannich addition of a dienolate to a chiral pyridinium salt to set the first chiral center. The absolute stereochemistry of this key center was then relayed by a sequence of substrate-controlled reactions, including a highly stereoselective epoxidation/ring opening sequence and an oxidative rearrangement of an indole to furnish a spirooxindole to establish the remaining stereocenters in the pentacyclic core of the citrinadins. An early stage intermediate in the synthesis of (-)-citrinadin A was deoxygenated to generate a dehydroxy compound that was elaborated into (+)-citrinadin B by a sequence of reaction identical to those used to prepare (-)-citrinadin A. These concise syntheses of (-)-citrinadin A and (+)-citrinadin B led to a revision of their stereochemical structures.
The concise, enantioselective total syntheses of (-)-citrinadin A and (+)-citrinadin B in a total of only 20 and 21 steps, respectively, from commercially available starting materials are described. Our strategy, which minimizes refunctionalization and protection/deprotection operations, features the highly diastereoselective, vinylogous Mannich addition of a dienolate to a chiral pyridinium salt to set the first chiral center. The absolute stereochemistry of this key center was then relayed by a sequence of substrate-controlled reactions, including a highly stereoselective epoxidation/ring opening sequence and an oxidative rearrangement of an indole to furnish a spirooxindole to establish the remaining stereocenters in the pentacyclic core of the citrinadins. An early stage intermediate in the synthesis of (-)-citrinadin A was deoxygenated to generate a dehydroxy compound that was elaborated into (+)-citrinadin Bby a sequence of reaction identical to those used to prepare (-)-citrinadin A. These concise syntheses of (-)-citrinadin A and (+)-citrinadin B led to a revision of their stereochemical structures.
Secondary metabolites
of fungi have a long and rich history as
an important reservoir of biologically active molecules having unusual
structures.[1] The marine-derived fungus Penicillium citrinum has been a source of a number
different classes of natural products,[2] and in 2004 and 2005 Kobayashi and co-workers reported the isolation
of the two related spirooxindole alkaloids (−)-citrinadin A
(1) and (+)-citrinadin B (2) (Figure 1), which exhibited notable activity against murineleukemia L1210 (1, IC50 6.2 μg/mL; 2, 10 μg/mL) and humanepidermoid carcinoma KB cells
(1, IC50 10 μg/mL).[3] The absolute and relative stereochemistry of the pentacyclic
cores of the citrinadins were assigned based upon a combination of
1D and 2D NMR experiments and electronic circular dichroism (ECD)
spectra. Specifically, ROESY correlations between protons on the N,N-dimethylvalinyl moiety and protons
on the E ring of a chlorohydrin derivative of citrinadin A were used
to assign the absolute stereochemical relationships in the E ring
relative to (S)-valine. Use of the negative first
Cotton effect observed in the ECD spectrum of this compound to assign
the absolute stereochemistry of the spirocenter as being S was consistent with ROESY data observed for (−)-citrinadin
A.[3b] The interpretation
of the ROESY data presumed a preferred orientation of the N,N-dimethylvalinyl side chain relative
to the E-ring. The absolute stereochemistry of the epoxide moiety
of citrinadin A was assigned as being (S) by comparing
its vibrational circular dichroism (VCD) spectrum with those of model
α-keto epoxides of known absolute stereochemistry.
Figure 1
Originally
proposed structures for citrinadins A (1) and B (2), PF1270A–C (3–5), and revised structures of citrinadins A (6) and B
(7).
A similar
group of alkaloids designated as PF1270 A–C (3–5, Figure 1)
were subsequently isolated from Penicillium waksmanii strain PF1270 by Kushida in 2007; PF1270 A (3), B (4) and C (5) exhibit submicromolar affinities
for human H3 histamine receptor (Ki 0.047,
0.12, and 0.22 μM, respectively).[4] Although the absolute stereochemistry of 3–5 was not assigned, the relative stereochemical relationships
between the pentacyclic core and the epoxy ketone side chain were
established by X-ray crystallographic analysis of 3.
A comparison of the structures of 1–5 reveals that the relative stereochemical relationships between the
pentacyclic core and the epoxy ketone moieties are opposite.Originally
proposed structures for citrinadins A (1) and B (2), PF1270A–C (3–5), and revised structures of citrinadins A (6) and B
(7).Interest in the citrinadinsby members of the synthetic community
has been driven by a combination of their unusual molecular architecture
coupled with their biological activity. The pentacyclic framework
comprises a spirooxindole that is connected by a cyclopentane ring
to a highly substituted quinolizidine ring. The pentacyclic ring system
of citrinadin A is punctuated with six stereocenters that include
two functionalized tertiary carbon atoms, two contiguous quaternary
carbon atoms, and there is an α–epoxy ketone moiety appended
to the aromatic ring. Several approaches to the citrinadins have been
published,[5] and the Wood group recently
completed the first total synthesis of (+)-citrinadin B using a convergent
strategy wherein the spirooxindole ring system and the piperidine
ring were joined via a [3 + 2] cycloaddition.[6] Simultaneous with the report of Wood and co-workers, we disclosed
the first total synthesis of (−)-citrinadin A[7] by a linear approach, in which the first chiral center
was created by an enantioselective vinylogous Mannich addition, and
the remaining stereocenters on the pentacyclic core were set by substrate
based control.[8] It is notable that these
two total syntheses led to revisions of the stereochemical structures
of citrinadin A and citrinadin B as being 6 and 7, respectively, thereby demonstrating that the relative stereochemical
relationships of the citrinadins in fact correspond to those reported
for PF1270A–C (3–5). Herein
we provide the details of our synthetic efforts toward the citrinadins
that culminated in the enantioselective total syntheses of (−)-citrinadin
A (6) and its congener (+)-citrinadin B (7).
Results and Discussion
First Generation Approach
Our initial
retrosynthetic
plan toward citrinadins A (6) and B (7)
was a convergent one and is outlined in Scheme 1. Because these two alkaloids share a closely related pentacyclic
skeleton, we envisioned a unified route for their synthesis that employed
the spirooxindole 9 as a common intermediate. For example,
coupling 9 with the organozinc reagent of an appropriately
substituted piperidine 11 (R1 = H, OR) would
give adducts that could be transformed into citrinadin A or citrinadinB via the pentacyclic intermediates 8. Specifically,
the 1,2-amino alcohol motif in 6 and 7 would
be established by selective epoxidation of 8 from the
more accessible face of the carbon–carbon double bond followed
by ring-opening, and the epoxy ketone could be introduced via a cross-coupling
reaction. In early work directed toward the citrinadins, we developed
a novel, oxidation/rearrangement approach for the enantioselective
synthesis of spirooxindoles that served as precursors of compounds
related to 9,[5a] but we found
that organozinc reagents related to 11 (R1 = H) were unstable, and attempts to induce their desired coupling
with 9 were unsuccessful. Accordingly, we adopted an
alternate strategy to generate a precursor of 8. This
plan featured a vinylogous Mannich reaction[9] involving a dienolate generated from 10 and the pyridinium
salt 12, the selection of which was inspired by related
work of Comins.[10] Implicit in this approach
was the hope that the spiro stereocenter in the dienolate derived
from 9 would either direct the diastereofacial outcome
in the addition to an achiral variant of 12 or that this stereocenter would not interfere with directive effects
of 12 bearing a chiral carbamate auxiliary.
Scheme 1
First Generation
Retrosynthesis of Citrinadins
To evaluate the diastereoselectivity in the addition of
a dienolate
such as 10 to an achiral pyridinium salt, we synthesized
the functionalized spirooxindole 18 from 15 (Scheme 2), which was readily prepared in
64% overall yield from commercially
available 2,2-dimethylcyclohexane-1,3-dione (14) in four
straightforward steps that involved protection,[11] crossed Claisen condensation, enol triflate formation,
and methylation. Hydrolysis of the ketal moiety in 15, followed by phenylhydrazone formation and Fischerindole synthesis,
produced the tricyclic indole 16, which was protected
to give the Boc carbamate 17. Treatment of 17 with dimethyldioxirane (DMDO) gave an intermediate epoxide that
underwent a facile semipinacol rearrangement upon exposure to SiO2 to provide the spirooxindole 18.[5a,12] Several preliminary experiments to generate the dienolate from 18 suggested that the imide moiety might be unstable to these
reaction conditions, so the oxindole was reduced, and the intermediate N,O-hemiacetal was converted to the more
robust N,O-acetal 19. Deprotonation of 19 with lithium diisopropylamide
(LDA), followed by transmetalation with ZnCl2 and reaction
of the enolate thus formed with TIPS-pyridinium salt 12,[10b,10c] gave the adduct 21, which was
treated with K2CO3 in MeOH to induce cyclization.
A single diastereoisomeric pentacyclic product 22 was
isolated in ∼10% yield, but a NOESY experiment suggested the
relative stereochemistry at C(16) was opposite that required. It is
perhaps noteworthy that addition of 20 to the methoxypyridinium
salt 13, which lacks the TIPS group, gave a mixture (∼1:1)
of diastereomeric adducts. Based upon these preliminary experiments,
it appeared that substrate-control enforced by the stereochemistry
at the spirocenter C(3) of 19 was opposite that found
in the citrinadins.
Scheme 2
Addition of a Spirooxindole Dienolate to a Substituted
Pyridinium
Salt
Second Generation Approach
To address the undesired
stereochemical outcome in the vinylogous Mannich reaction of 19, we developed an alternate plan in which we envisioned
stereochemistry at C(16) of 23 might direct the stereoselectivity
of the oxidation/rearrangement to establish the requisite stereochemistry
at the C(3) spirocenter of 8 (Scheme 3). We also knew from early work that the stereochemistry of
spirooxindole formation could be controlled using a chiral auxiliary
on the indolenitrogen atom of 23,[5a] which would be accessible from 24 via a Fisher
indole reaction. Synthesis of the tricyclic intermediate 24 from its precursor 25 simply required N-deprotection and cyclization. A key step in this new approach involves
formation of 25 by a stereoselective, vinylogous Mannich
reaction between the dienolate derived from 15 and either
an iminium ion such as 26 or a pyridinium salt 27 bearing a chiral auxiliary, Xc. Mindful of precedent
that additions of small nucleophiles to piperidine-derived iminium
salts like 26 proceed to give cis-2,6-disubstituted
products as a consequence of the combined effects of A1,2-strain and stereoelectronic control,[13] we hypothesized that a more bulky nucleophile, such as a dienolate
derived from 15, might add to 26 via a boat-like
transition state to give a trans-2,6-disubstituted
piperidine. If this outcome was not observed, we would then use 27 as the electrophilic partner in the vinylogous Mannich
reaction in accord with the work of Comins.[10]
Scheme 3
Second Generation Approaches to the Citrinadins
Toward probing the diastereoselectivity of vinylogous
Mannich reactions
with substituted iminium ions 26, the dienol ether 28 and racemic 29, which was prepared by a procedure
reported by Rychnovsky,[14] were allowed
to react in the presence of TMSOTf to give a mixture (3:1) of isomeric
adducts 30 (Scheme 4). Because
it was impossible to assign the structure of the major isomer, this
mixture was subjected to N-debenzylation using transfer
hydrogenation, and the resulting amines 31 were subjected
to cyclization by heating in benzene to form lactams 32 and 33. The major diastereomer of this mixture was
purified by chromatography. Unfortunately, a NOESY experiment revealed
a nOe between the protons at C(12) and C(16) of this compound, suggesting
that the major product was 32. The vinylogous Mannich
reaction had thus proceeded preferentially with the undesired diastereofacial
selectivity.
Scheme 4
Vinylogous Mannich Addition to a Substituted 1,2-Dehydropiperidine
Inspired by the seminal work
of Comins and Sahn,[10d] we then examined
the stereoselectivity of the addition
of the zinc dienolate 34 to the chiral pyridinium salt 35, which was generated in situ by the reaction
of 3-TIPS-4-methoxypyridine and the chloroformate derivative of (+)-trans-2-(α-cumyl)cyclohexanol [(+)-TCC] (Scheme 5). This reaction proceeded successfully to give 36 with high diastereoselectivity (dr = 92:8), and the absolute
stereochemistry at the newly created stereocenter at C(16) was initially
assigned by analogy with the extensive findings of Comins.[10] This preliminary assignment would later be verified
by X-ray crystallography of a derived intermediate (cf. Figure 2).
Scheme 5
Vinylogous Mannich Addition of a Dienolate
to a Chiral Pyridinium
Salt
Figure 2
X-ray structure of 56.
Having at long last discovered
a reliable and efficient strategy
to establish the requisite absolute stereochemistry at C(16) of the
citrinadins, we turned our attention to forming a suitable CDE tricyclic
intermediate (Scheme 6). In the event, exposure
of 36 to Cs2CO3 in methanol induced
removal of the chiral auxiliary, and spontaneous cyclization ensued
to provide the lactam 37 in 84% ee together with about
70% recovered (+)-TCC. Gratifyingly, we found that the optical purity
of 37 could be easily improved to 98% ee (chiral HPLC,
see Supporting Information) after a recrystallization.
Desilylation of the lactam 37 was most efficiently effected
employing excess TBAF and microwave heating to afford enone 38.
Scheme 6
Preparation of a Key Tricyclic Intermediate
The stereoselective 1,4-addition
of a methyl group to 38 proved to be more problematic
than anticipated, presumably owing
to the relatively planar nature of the tricyclic ring system. Additions
of simple methyl-derived cuprates and related reagents proceeded with
low (<2:1) diastereoselectivity. Similarly, the 1,4-additions of
organocopper reagents derived from metalated bis(phenylthio)methane[15] and tris(phenylthio)methane[16] were rather unselective and also low yielding. After extensive
experimentation, we eventually discovered that the organocopper reagent
generated from (dimethylphenylsilyl)methylmagnesium chloride[17] and CuBr·DMS added smoothly to 38 in the presence of BF3·OEt2 to give a
mixture of ketones that were directly reduced with high stereoselectivity
using l-selectride to give 39 in 71% yield over
two steps; 19% of the C(12) epimer of 39 was also isolated.
We resisted the temptation to protect the secondary hydroxyl group
and heated 39 with TBAF in a microwave oven to obtain
the unsaturated lactam 40.[18]At this juncture, the challenging tasks associated with stereoselective
elaboration of the spirooxindole ring and introduction of the amino
alcohol moiety were at hand. We first wanted to ascertain whether
the stereocenter at C(16) in a pentacyclic intermediate such as 41 might direct the stereochemical outcome of an oxidation/rearrangement
sequence to generate a spirooxindole. Because we wished to conserve
the more valuable, enantiomerically pure intermediates in the planned
exploratory experiments, we prepared the racemic ketal -40 from the product of the
vinylogous Mannich reaction of 13 and 34 in accord with the transformations outlined in Scheme 6. When -40 was
heated with o-chlorophenylhydrazine hydrochloride
in refluxing sulfuric acid (5% v/v), -41 was isolated in 69% yield (Scheme 7).[19] Toward converting -41 into the spirooxindole -43, a number of standard oxidants,
including OsO4, NBS, and Pb(OAc)4 were evaluated,[20] but mixtures of products were invariably obtained.
However, we found that treating -41 with tert-BuOCl, followed by exposure
of the intermediate chloroindolenines -42 to aqueous acid, provided a mixture (1.5:1 by 1HNMR) of diastereomeric spirooxindoles -43 as an inseparable mixture.[21] This result suggested that the resident chirality in -41 is too remote to influence
the diastereofacial selectivity of the chlorination of -41 to preferentially give the epimer
of -42 that is required
for the stereoselective formation of -43.
Scheme 7
Preliminary Experiment To Induce Stereoselective Formation
of a Spirooxindole
The finding that the oxidation/rearrangement of 41 was not very selective clearly mandated a change in strategy
for
the end game of the synthesis. We considered the possibility of introducing
a chiral carbamate on the indolenitrogen atom because we had previously
shown that reactions of such compounds with DMDO followed by rearrangement
of the intermediate epoxide could be highly diasteroselective.[5a] However, such an approach suffered from the
need to use a second chiral auxiliary as a stoichiometric reagent,
so we considered that plan to be stereochemically inefficient relative
to exploiting substrate control to establish relative stereochemistry
following the diastereoselective vinylogous Mannich reaction. We were
thus intrigued by an alternative approach in which the amino alcohol
moiety in 45 was envisioned to direct the stereochemical
course of an oxidation/rearrangement sequence to furnish 44 (Scheme 8).
Scheme 8
Revised Endgame for
the Synthesis of the Citrinadins
The transformation of enantiomerically pure 40 into 45 was surprisingly straightforward. Epoxidation
of 40 with peroxytrifluoroacetic acid in the presence
of sodium
carbonate was highly diastereoselective, proceeding from the more
accessible, slightly convex face to furnish a single epoxide 47 (Scheme 9).[22] Although this epoxidation could also be performed in unbuffered
media, the ketal moiety suffered hydrolysis under those conditions.
The reaction of epoxide 47 with aqueous methylamine in
a sealed tube also occurred with high diastereoselectivity to deliver
the requisite amino alcohol 46 in 95% yield. Heating 46 with o-bromophenylhydrazine hydrochloride
in aqueous sulfuric acid provided the indole 45 in 81%
yield; trace amounts of the debromo derivative of 45 were
observed by LCMS.[23]
Scheme 9
Preparation of Pentacyclic
Indole Core 45
The stage was now set to test the feasibility of creating
the critical
spirocenter at C(3) by a substrate-controlled oxidation/rearrangement
of 45. Anticipating that some of the reactions might
be troublesome, we again decided to perform our exploratory experiments
using 45, which was
conveniently prepared from -40 following the sequence of reactions depicted in Scheme 9. As noted previously, creation of spirooxindoles
from indolesby oxidation followed by skeletal rearrangement is well
documented.[19,20] However, inducing such a transformation
on indole 45 proved
to be much more challenging than anticipated, and many established
protocols did not give the desired spirocyclic product. The functionality
present in 45 appeared
to conspire against us, but we were reluctant to indulge in a series
of unpredictable protecting group maneuvers.In early studies
with model systems, we had examined the possible
use of Davis’ oxaziridine 48 to induce the oxidation
and rearrangement of simple indoles to generate spirooxindoles, but
these efforts were unsuccessful. Driven by desperation and inspired
by several reports of Williams, who recently used oxaziridines in
elegant syntheses of spirooxindole alkaloids related to the notoamides,[24] we treated 45 with an excess of 48 and isolated a
moderately stable epoxide that was exposed acetic acid to initiate
a facile semipinacol rearrangement (Scheme 10). Gratifyingly, the structure of the product was established by
X-ray crystallography to be the desired spirooxindole 50. The stereochemical outcome of
this sequence is consistent with a hydroxyl group-directed delivery
of 48 to the bottom face of -45 to give 49.
Scheme 10
Synthesis of Racemic Pentacyclic Core of Citrinadin
A: The Initial
Plan
We had thus successfully prepared
the pentacyclic core characteristic
of citrinadins A and B. The euphoria associated with achieving this
milestone was short-lived, however, because all efforts to selectively
reduce the tertiary δ-lactam moiety in 50 in the presence of the secondary γ-lactam
to cleanly give 44 using
a variety of hydride reducing agents were uniformly unsuccessful.[25] Alane was found to be the best reagent, giving 44 along with the products
from reduction of the γ-lactam and both lactams in variable
yields. Attempts to optimize the reduction by varying reaction temperature
and amount of alane failed to improve the chemoselectivity.To avoid the problems associated with the unselective lactam reduction,
we decided to reverse the steps and reduce the lactam in -45 prior to the oxidation/rearrangement
sequence (Scheme 11). In the event, reduction
of -45 with the complex
of alane and dimethylethylamine (DMEA)[20b,25b] delivered -51 in excellent yield. We
found it was necessary to protonate the basic amino groups in -51 to protect them from oxidation
under the conditions of the next step. Accordingly, sequential treatment
of -51 with trifluoroacetic
acid (TFA) and then an excess of Davis’ oxaziridine 48 directly delivered the spirooxindole -53 as a single diastereoisomer, presumably via the
intermediate epoxide -52. To our dismay, however, X-ray crystallographic analysis revealed
that the product was -53, wherein the relative stereochemistry at C(3) is opposite
that present in the citrinadins. The aberrant stereochemical
outcome of this oxidation relative to that of -45 can be rationalized if the protonated,
axial N-methylammonium group in 51 directs the oxidation by Davis’ oxaziridine 48 from the top face to give 52, which then undergoes rearrangement leading to the
formation of the undesired spirooxindole 53.
Scheme 11
Successful Synthesis of Racemic Pentacyclic
Core of Citrinadin A
This analysis suggested that a bulky Lewis or Brønsted
acid
might associate with the axial secondary amine group, thereby blocking
the top face of 51 and
enforcing approach of Davis’ oxaziridine 48 from
the bottom face. Indeed, we had utilized this tactic to direct the
stereochemistry of chlorination of an indole ring in our successful
syntheses of the Strychnos alkaloidsakuammicine
and strychnine.[26] A variety of Brønsted
acids (e.g., AcOH, camphorsulfonic acid, and TsOH) and Lewis acids
(e.g., AlEt3, SnCl4, ZnCl2 and BF3·OEt2) were screened, but none of these led
to the desired spirooxindole 44. We eventually discovered that treating -51 sequentially with pyridinium p-toluenesulfonate (PPTS), excess of Davis’ oxaziridine 48, and then acetic acid provided the spirooxindole -44 as a single stereoisomer,
the structure of which was unambiguously determined by X-ray analysis.
The apparently unique role that PPTS plays in controlling the stereochemical
outcome of this oxidation is not understood, but we tentatively surmise
that ion-pairing effects may be involved that render oxidation from
the top face of -51 sterically
unfavorable.Having thus validated our approach to the stereoselective
synthesis
of the pentacyclic core of the citrinadins, it was necessary to prepare 44 in enantiomerically pure form and to install the dimethyl
valine side chain on the hydroxyl group at C(14) and the epoxy ketone
side chain on the aromatic ring to complete the synthesis of citrinadin
A (6). In the event, following the procedures outlined
in Scheme 11, enantiomerically pure 45 was readily transformed into enantiomerically pure 44 (Scheme 12). After unsuccessfully investigating
the possibility of converting the aryl bromide group in 44 directly into an α,β-unsaturated ketone using a carbonylative
cross-coupling reaction we had previously developed,[27] we turned to a stepwise procedure that commenced with the
Sonogashira coupling between 44 and 3-methylbut-1-yne
to furnish the alkyne 55.[28]O-Acylation of the hydroxyl group at C(14) with N,N-dimethyl-l-valine in the presence
of 1-ethyl-3-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)carbodiimide (EDCI)
and 4-N,N-dimethylaminopyridine
(DMAP) provided 56 in excellent yield.[29] The absolute and relative stereochemistry of 56 was established unequivocally by X-ray crystallography (Figure 2). The gold-promoted
oxidation of 56 using 2-bromopyridine N-oxide according to a method reported by Zhang gave the enone 57.[30] Finally, diastereoselective
epoxidation of 57 to deliver a mixture (5:1) of 6 and 58, respectively, was achieved by applying
an Enders protocol for the enantioselective synthesis of (S)-epoxides from α,β-unsaturated ketones using
(S,S)-N-methylpseudoephedrine
as the chiral ligand.[31]
Scheme 12
First Total Synthesis
of (−)-Citrinadin A (6)
X-ray structure of 56.The CD spectrum of the synthetic 6 thus obtained
as
the free base is identical with that reported by Kobayashi for (−)-citrinadin
A,[3b] whereas the CD spectrum for 58 is very different (Figure 3). The 1H and 13CNMR data of the free base forms of 6 and 58 are wholly consistent with their assigned
structures, and the 1H and 13CNMR data of 6 as its putative bis-hydrochloride salt, which was formed
upon standing in CDCl3, are also in good agreement with
those reported for a bis-salt of (−)-citrinadin A (see Supporting Information).[3] Because we were unable to obtain an authentic sample of (−)-citrinadin
A or its bis-salt, a direct comparison of natural material with the
synthetic sample was not possible. Nevertheless, the CD spectrum of
synthetic 1 coupled with the crystallographic data for 56 strongly suggests that the correct stereochemical structure
of (−)-citrinadin A is 6, so the absolute stereochemistry
of the pentacyclic core of the citrinadins is opposite that assigned by Kobayashi.[3] Notably,
this revised structure is in agreement with the findings of Wood and
co-workers, who completed the first total synthesis of (+)-citrinadinB.[6]
Figure 3
(a) CD Spectra of 6 and 58. (b) CD spectra
of citrinadins A and B. Adapted with permission from (3b). Copyright 2005 American
Chemical Society.
(a) CD Spectra of 6 and 58. (b) CD spectra
of citrinadins A and B. Adapted with permission from (3b). Copyright 2005 American
Chemical Society.Further corroboration
of the correctness of the stereochemical
assignment of (−)-citrinadin A as being that shown in 6 was obtained by the independent synthesis of 1, the compound that Kobayashi had assigned as being (−)-citrinadin
A (Scheme 13).[3] In
the event, the vinylogous Mannich reaction of the zinc dienolate of 15 with the chiral pyridinium salt 35, which has (−)-TCC as the chiral
auxiliary, provided the adduct 36 in 61% yield (dr = 94:6). Following the same sequence of
reactions described for the conversion of 36 into 57 (Schemes 6, 9, and 12), 36 was transformed into 59 in 4.2% overall
yield over 14 steps. It is significant that en route to 59, the absolute configuration of -44 was unambiguously established by X-ray crystallography
(Figure 4). Diastereoselective epoxidation
of enone 59 with (S,S)-N-methylpseudoephedrine according to the Enders protocol afforded
a separable mixture (2:1) of 60 and 1.[31] The CD spectra of neither the major isomer 60 nor 1 matches the CD spectrum for (−)-citrinadin
A reported by Kobayashi (Figure 5).[3b] On the contrary, the CD spectrum of 60 is clearly opposite to that of naturally occurring (−)-citrinadin
A. This observation is consistent with the absolute stereochemistry
of the pentacyclic core of 60 being enantiomeric to that
of (−)-citrinadin A, which must therefore have the stereochemical
structure depicted in 6.
Scheme 13
Synthesis of (−)-Citrinadin
A Isomer 1
Figure 4
X-ray structure of . A molecule
of CHCl2 and AcOH was removed for clarity.
Figure 5
CD Spectra of 60, 1, and 6.
X-ray structure of . A molecule
of CHCl2 and AcOH was removed for clarity.CD Spectra of 60, 1, and 6.
Total Synthesis of (+)-Citrinadin
B
The difference
between citrinadin A (6) and citrinadin B (7) is the presence of a dimethyl valine ester at C(14). Accordingly,
one may envisage that deoxygenation at C(14) of a late stage intermediate
in the synthesis of citrinadin A would give a precursor of citrinadinB. In several exploratory experiments, we examined the feasibility
of deoxygenating -50 and -44 using procedures
reported by Barton[32] and Myers,[33] but because mixtures of products were obtained,
we turned to the removal of the C(14) hydroxyl group an earlier stage.
Thus, Barton deoxygenation of 40 afforded 61 in 73% yield (Scheme 14). Epoxidation of 61 using buffered peroxytrifluoroacetic acid gave epoxide 62 (77% yield) as a single stereoisomer, and when 62 was heated with aqueous methylamine, the desired amino alcohol 63 was isolated in 94% yield. The Fisher indole reaction of 63 with o-bromophenylhydrazine hydrochloride
furnished the pentacyclic indole 64, which was then converted
into the spirooxindole 65 in 34% overall yield by sequential
hydride reduction of the tertiary lactam, indole oxidation with Davis’
oxaziridine 48, and acid-catalyzed rearrangement of the
intermediate epoxide. The aryl bromide moiety of 65 was
then elaborated via a Sonogashira coupling with 3-methylbut-1-yne
to furnish the alkyne 66 that was processed to the enone 67 in 68% overall yield from 65 by reaction with
2-bromopyridine N-oxide in the presence of gold.[30] Finally, epoxidation of enone 67 using the Enders procedure[31] afforded
a separable mixture of 7 and 68 (dr = 2.5:1).
The CD spectrum of major isomer 7 was in agreement with
CD data obtained for natural (+)-citrinadin (B), and the spectral
data (1H and 13CNMR) of the synthetic 7 thus isolated were consistent with those reported by Wood.[6]
Scheme 14
Total Synthesis of (+)-Citrinadin B
Summary and Conclusions
In summary, we completed the enantioselective total syntheses of
(−)-citrinadin A (6) and (+)-citrinadin B (7) by concise sequences of reactions involving only 20 and
21 steps, respectively, from commercially available starting materials.
The brevity of the approach was enabled by minimizing protecting group
operations and unproductive refunctionalization. The syntheses of 6 and 7 feature a highly diastereoselective,
vinylogous Mannich reaction of a dienolate with a chiral pyridinium
salt to establish the first stereogenic center. The stereochemical
efficiency of the syntheses was then possible because the chirality
of this carbon atom was exploited to introduce the remaining stereocenters
of the pentacyclic core in a linear sequence of reactions that were
subject to substrate-control. Notable stereoselective transformations
include an epoxidation/ring opening sequence and an oxidation/rearrangement
of an indole to furnish a spirooxindole. Our completion of the syntheses
of 6 and 7 coupled with the corroborative
findings of Wood[6] led to the revision of
the stereochemical structures from those that were originally proposed
as being 1 and 2, respectively, by Kobayashi,[3b] who relied upon ROESY and ECD data to assign
absolute and relative stereochemical relationships in the pentacyclic
cores of the citrinadins. The misassignment of the absolute stereochemistry
of the citrinadin structures by Kobayashi serves as a reminder of
the potential pitfalls associated with using ROESY, as well as ECD,
when assigning stereochemistry, especially when other stereoisomers
are not available for comparison.
Authors: Muhammad Saleem; Muhammad Shaiq Ali; Shafqat Hussain; Abdul Jabbar; Muhammad Ashraf; Yong Sup Lee Journal: Nat Prod Rep Date: 2007-03-22 Impact factor: 13.423
Authors: Thomas J Greshock; Alan W Grubbs; Ping Jiao; Donald T Wicklow; James B Gloer; Robert M Williams Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2008 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Jason P Burke; Zhiguo Bian; Subrata Shaw; Bin Zhao; Craig M Goodwin; Johannes Belmar; Carrie F Browning; Dominico Vigil; Anders Friberg; DeMarco V Camper; Olivia W Rossanese; Taekyu Lee; Edward T Olejniczak; Stephen W Fesik Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Zhiwen Liu; Fanglong Zhao; Boyang Zhao; Jie Yang; Joseph Ferrara; Banumathi Sankaran; B V Venkataram Prasad; Biki Bapi Kundu; George N Phillips; Yang Gao; Liya Hu; Tong Zhu; Xue Gao Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-07-06 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Monica E McCallum; Genessa M Smith; Takanori Matsumaru; Ke Kong; John A Enquist; John L Wood Journal: J Antibiot (Tokyo) Date: 2016-03-09 Impact factor: 2.649