Literature DB >> 25211402

Drug retention rates of second biologic agents after switching from tumor necrosis factor inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis in Japanese patients on low-dose methotrexate or without methotrexate.

Tomonori Kobayakawa1, Toshihisa Kojima, Nobunori Takahashi, Masatoshi Hayashi, Yuichiro Yabe, Atsushi Kaneko, Tomone Shioura, Kiwamu Saito, Yuji Hirano, Yasuhide Kanayama, Hiroyuki Miyake, Nobuyuki Asai, Koji Funahashi, Shinya Hirabara, Masahiro Hanabayashi, Shuji Asai, Naoki Ishiguro.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to explore drug retention rates of second biologic agents after switching from tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in clinical practice in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on low-dose methotrexate (MTX) or without MTX.
METHODS: A total of 169 RA patients who had been withdrawn from first-course TNFi therapy and received a different TNFi or tocilizumab (TCZ) as a second biologic agent were selected from the Tsurumai Biologics Communication Registry, an observational cohort database. Retention rates of second biologic treatment were compared by the type of first TNFi and second biologic agents.
RESULTS: Eighty-six patients received first-course infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab (ADA) therapy, and 83 patients received first-course etanercept (ETN) therapy. The former group had a significantly higher retention rate (IFX, 81.1%; ADA, 83.3%) of the second biologic therapy compared to the latter (56.6%, p < 0.001, log-rank test). Drug retention rates of the second biologic agent after switching from IFX/ADA were significantly higher with ETN (90.0%) and TCZ (94.7%) than with ADA/IFX (59.3%). Drug retention rates of the second biologic agent after switching from ETN were significantly higher with TCZ (75.9%) than with ADA/IFX (46.3%). The differences were significant even after adjusting for baseline clinical variables using the Cox proportional hazards model.
CONCLUSIONS: Drug retention rates of IFX and ADA after switching from the first TNFi were significantly lower compared to those of ETN and TCZ in patients on low-dose MTX or without MTX.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Methotrexate; Rheumatoid arthritis; Second-line drug; TNF inhibitor; Tocilizumab

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25211402     DOI: 10.3109/14397595.2014.953668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Rheumatol        ISSN: 1439-7595            Impact factor:   3.023


  4 in total

1.  [Switching within the active ingredient group or changing the mechanism of action. Data situation by failure of the first line biologic].

Authors:  A Rubbert-Roth
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 2.  The second decade of anti-TNF-a therapy in clinical practice: new lessons and future directions in the COVID-19 era.

Authors:  Gerasimos Evangelatos; Giorgos Bamias; George D Kitas; George Kollias; Petros P Sfikakis
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 3.580

3.  Treatment Persistence and Clinical Outcomes of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Cycling or Switching to a New Mechanism of Action Therapy: Real-world Observational Study of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in the United States with Prior Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Therapy.

Authors:  Wenhui Wei; Keith Knapp; Li Wang; Chieh-I Chen; Gary L Craig; Karen Ferguson; Sergio Schwartzman
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  Efficacy, retention, and safety of tofacitinib in real-life: Hur-bio monocentric experience

Authors:  Emre Bilgin; Furkan Ceylan; Emine Duran; Bayram Farisoğullari; Ertuğrul Çağri Bölek; Gözde Kübra Yardimci; Levent Kiliç; Alİ Akdoğan; Ömer Karadağ; Şaziye Şule Apraş Bilgen; Sedat Kiraz; Ali İhsan Ertenli; Umut Kalyoncu
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 0.973

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.