Literature DB >> 25211161

Advances in genetic prenatal diagnosis and screening.

Emily E Hardisty1, Neeta L Vora.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Prenatal diagnostic and screening tests are routinely offered to all women in pregnancy. Advances in technology have led to an expansion in available testing. As technology improves, women are facing increasingly complex decisions regarding the quantity and quality of information they wish to have regarding their fetus. RECENT
FINDINGS: Professional guidelines support the use of chromosomal microarray analysis as a first-tier test in place of standard karyotype for the evaluation of fetal chromosomes when one or more anomaly is detected by ultrasound. These same guidelines indicate that either chromosomal microarray analysis or standard karyotype can be offered for prenatal diagnosis with a phenotypically normal fetus. Additionally, recent work continues to validate the use of noninvasive prenatal testing for the detection of aneuploidy in the high-risk population. This testing utilizes cell-free DNA in the maternal circulation to predict fetal karyotype with greater sensitivity and specificity than maternal serum screening or first trimester screening. Data continue to accumulate supporting noninvasive prenatal testing use in an all-risk or low-risk population. Additionally, noninvasive prenatal testing is clinically available to screen for a select number of microdeletion syndromes, broadening the scope of population-based screening to include conditions not previously evaluated, although there are limited data available regarding this application.
SUMMARY: As prenatal diagnosis becomes increasingly complex, there is a need for the education of both patients and providers regarding the benefits and limitations of the testing strategies available to them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25211161     DOI: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr        ISSN: 1040-8703            Impact factor:   2.856


  5 in total

1.  Comparing genetic counselor's and patient's perceptions of needs in prenatal chromosomal microarray testing.

Authors:  Sarah A Walser; Katherine S Kellom; Steven C Palmer; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Changes in and Efficacies of Indications for Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis of Cytogenomic Abnormalities: 13 Years of Experience in a Single Center.

Authors:  Jinlai Meng; Chelsea Matarese; Julianna Crivello; Katherine Wilcox; Dongmei Wang; Autumn DiAdamo; Fang Xu; Peining Li
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-07-05

3.  Performance Evaluation of NIPT in Detection of Chromosomal Copy Number Variants Using Low-Coverage Whole-Genome Sequencing of Plasma DNA.

Authors:  Hongtai Liu; Ya Gao; Zhiyang Hu; Linhua Lin; Xuyang Yin; Jun Wang; Dayang Chen; Fang Chen; Hui Jiang; Jinghui Ren; Wei Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Non-invasive prenatal screening for Emanuel syndrome.

Authors:  Yuqin Luo; Jie Lin; Yixi Sun; Yeqing Qian; Liya Wang; Min Chen; Minyue Dong; Fan Jin
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  False-Positive Maternal Serum Screens in the Second Trimester as Markers of Placentally Mediated Complications Later in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Christy L Pylypjuk; Joel Monarrez-Espino
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.434

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.