Laura E Dichtel1, Kevin C J Yuen, Miriam A Bredella, Anu V Gerweck, Brian M Russell, Ariana D Riccio, Michelle H Gurel, Patrick M Sluss, Beverly M K Biller, Karen K Miller. 1. Neuroendocrine Unit (L.E.D., B.M.K.B., K.K.M.) and Department of Radiology (M.A.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114; Neuroendocrine Unit (A.V.G., B.M.R., A.D.R., M.H.G.) and Clinical Pathology Core Laboratory (P.M.S.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114; and Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Clinical Nutrition (K.C.J.Y.), Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Obesity is associated with diminished GH secretion, which may result in the overdiagnosis of adult GH deficiency (GHD) in overweight/obese pituitary patients. However, there are no body mass index (BMI)-specific peak GH cutoffs for the glucagon stimulation test (GST), the favored dynamic test for assessing adult GHD in the United States. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine a peak GH cutoff level for the diagnosis of adult GHD in overweight/obese individuals using the GST. DESIGN: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study. SETTING: The study was conducted at Massachusetts General Hospital and Oregon Health and Science University. METHODS: A total of 108 subjects with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m(2) were studied: healthy controls (n = 47), subjects with total pituitary deficiency (TPD) (n = 20, ≥ 3 non-GH pituitary hormone deficiencies), and subjects with partial pituitary deficiency (PPD) (n = 41, 1-2 non-GH pituitary hormone deficiencies). INTERVENTION: The intervention consisted of a standard 4-hour GST. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was peak GH level on GST. RESULTS: Using the standard peak GH cutoff of 3 ng/mL, 95% of TPD cases (19 of 20), 80% of PPD (33 of 41), and 45% of controls (21 of 47) were classified as GHD. In receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis (controls vs TPD), a peak GH value of 0.94 ng/mL provided the greatest sensitivity (90%) and specificity (94%). Using a peak GH cutoff of 1 ng/mL, 6% of controls (3 of 47), 59% of PPDs (24 of 41), and 90% of TPDs (18 of 20) were classified as GHD. BMI (R = -0.35, P = .02) and visceral adipose tissue (R = -0.32, P = .03) negatively correlated with peak GH levels in controls. CONCLUSION: A large proportion of healthy overweight/obese individuals (45%) failed the GST using the standard 3 ng/mL GH cutoff. Overweight/obese pituitary patients are at risk of being misclassified as GHD using this cutoff level. A 1-ng/mL GH cutoff may reduce the overdiagnosis of adult GHD in overweight/obese patients.
CONTEXT: Obesity is associated with diminished GH secretion, which may result in the overdiagnosis of adult GH deficiency (GHD) in overweight/obese pituitarypatients. However, there are no body mass index (BMI)-specific peak GH cutoffs for the glucagon stimulation test (GST), the favored dynamic test for assessing adult GHD in the United States. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine a peak GH cutoff level for the diagnosis of adult GHD in overweight/obese individuals using the GST. DESIGN: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study. SETTING: The study was conducted at Massachusetts General Hospital and Oregon Health and Science University. METHODS: A total of 108 subjects with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m(2) were studied: healthy controls (n = 47), subjects with total pituitary deficiency (TPD) (n = 20, ≥ 3 non-GH pituitary hormone deficiencies), and subjects with partial pituitary deficiency (PPD) (n = 41, 1-2 non-GH pituitary hormone deficiencies). INTERVENTION: The intervention consisted of a standard 4-hour GST. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was peak GH level on GST. RESULTS: Using the standard peak GH cutoff of 3 ng/mL, 95% of TPD cases (19 of 20), 80% of PPD (33 of 41), and 45% of controls (21 of 47) were classified as GHD. In receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis (controls vs TPD), a peak GH value of 0.94 ng/mL provided the greatest sensitivity (90%) and specificity (94%). Using a peak GH cutoff of 1 ng/mL, 6% of controls (3 of 47), 59% of PPDs (24 of 41), and 90% of TPDs (18 of 20) were classified as GHD. BMI (R = -0.35, P = .02) and visceral adipose tissue (R = -0.32, P = .03) negatively correlated with peak GH levels in controls. CONCLUSION: A large proportion of healthy overweight/obese individuals (45%) failed the GST using the standard 3 ng/mL GH cutoff. Overweight/obese pituitarypatients are at risk of being misclassified as GHD using this cutoff level. A 1-ng/mL GH cutoff may reduce the overdiagnosis of adult GHD in overweight/obesepatients.
Authors: H Pijl; J G Langendonk; J Burggraaf; M Frölich; A F Cohen; J D Veldhuis; A E Meinders Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Miriam A Bredella; Anu V Gerweck; Eleanor Lin; Melissa G Landa; Martin Torriani; David A Schoenfeld; Linda C Hemphill; Karen K Miller Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2013-07-03 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: G Aimaretti; C Baffoni; L DiVito; S Bellone; S Grottoli; M Maccario; E Arvat; F Camanni; E Ghigo Journal: Eur J Endocrinol Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 6.664
Authors: Miriam A Bredella; Corey M Gill; Anu V Gerweck; Melissa G Landa; Vidhya Kumar; Scott M Daley; Martin Torriani; Karen K Miller Journal: Radiology Date: 2013-07-16 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Amir H Hamrahian; Kevin C J Yuen; Murray B Gordon; Karen J Pulaski-Liebert; James Bena; Beverly M K Biller Journal: Pituitary Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 4.107
Authors: Ana Beatriz Winter Tavares; Ignácio Antônio Seixas-da-Silva; Diego H S Silvestre; Maria Fernanda Castelar Pinheiro; Mario Vaisman; Flávia Lucia Conceição Journal: Endocrine Date: 2017-03-11 Impact factor: 3.633