| Literature DB >> 25210603 |
Aytul Corbacioglu1, Bulent Baysal1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study investigated the effects of serum estradiol (E2) and progesterone levels on preovulatory endometrial thickness and echogenicity in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) cycles for in vitro fertilization (IVF).Entities:
Keywords: Endometrium; Estradiol; In vitro fertilization; Progesterone; Ultrasound
Year: 2012 PMID: 25210603 PMCID: PMC4152181
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Fertil Steril ISSN: 2008-0778
Comparisons of variables between the groups according to endometrial thickness
| Variable | Group 1 (n = 51) | Group 2 (n = 182) | Group 3 (n = 8) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31.33 ± 5.09 | 31.38 ± 5.55 | 31.50 ± 5.86 | 0.99 | |
| 3025.39 ± 1379.53 | 3308.58 ± 1329.41 | 3309.37 ± 2031.31 | 0.42 | |
| 3079.75 ± 2010.33 | 3090.45 ± 1815.77 | 3232.33 ± 2617.99 | 0.98 | |
| 1.40 ± 1.06 | 1.52 ± 1.46 | 1.06 ± 0.33 | 0.70 | |
| 13.43 ± 7.81 | 12.71 ± 7.03 | 12 ± 8.7 | 0.77 | |
| 2.71 ± 0.64 | 2.80 ± 0.50 | 2.63 ± 0.52 | 0.37 | |
| 29.4 | 26.4 | 12.5 | 0.59 | |
* Values are mean ± SD.
Summary of demographic data
| 241 | ||
| 31.3 ± 5.4 | ||
| 7.3 ± 4.5 | ||
| 45.6 | ||
| 17 | ||
| 5 | ||
| 2.5 | ||
| 26.1 | ||
| 3.7 | ||
| 1.5 ± 1 | ||
* Values are mean ± SD.
Comparisons of variables between the groups according to endometrial echogenicity
| Variable | Trilaminar (n = 184) | Isoechogenic(n = 24) | Hyperechogenic (n = 33) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30.82 ± 5.33 | 33.04 ± 5.46 | 33.27 ± 5.57 | 0.01 | |
| 3133.32 ± 1334.31 | 3467.79 ± 1202.42 | 3731.06 ± 1549.09 | 0.04 | |
| 3112.40 ± 1678.30 | 2835.17 ± 2307.44 | 3190 ± 2552.42 | 0.79 | |
| 1.50 ± 1.38 | 1.81 ± 1.84 | 1.12 ± 0.59 | 0.25 | |
| 13.54 ± 7.37 | 11.79 ± 5.62 | 9.70 ± 6.72 | 0.01 | |
| 2.81 ± 0.49 | 2.83 ± 0.48 | 2.55 ± 0.71 | 0.02 | |
| 26.6 | 20.8 | 30.3 | 0.72 | |
* Values are mean ± SD.