Literature DB >> 25209721

High definition versus standard definition white light endoscopy for detecting dysplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus.

S S Sami1, V Subramanian2, W M Butt1, G Bejkar1, J Coleman1, J Mannath3, K Ragunath1.   

Abstract

High-definition endoscopy systems provide superior image resolution. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of high definition compared with standard definition endoscopy system for detecting dysplastic lesions in patients with Barrett's esophagus. A retrospective cohort study of patients with non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus undergoing routine surveillance was performed. Data were retrieved from the central hospital electronic database. Procedures performed for non-surveillance indications, Barrett's esophagus Prague C0M1 classification with no specialized intestinal metaplasia on histology, patients diagnosed with any dysplasia or cancer on index endoscopy, and procedures using advanced imaging techniques were excluded. Logistic regression models were constructed to estimate adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals comparing outcomes with standard definition and high-definition systems. The high definition was superior to standard definition system in targeted detection of all dysplastic lesions (odds ratio 3.27, 95% confidence interval 1.27-8.40) as well as overall dysplasia detected on both random and target biopsies (odds ratio 2.36, 95% confidence interval 1.50-3.72). More non-dysplastic lesions were detected with the high-definition system (odds ratio 1.16, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.33). There was no difference between high definition and standard definition endoscopy in the overall (random and target) high-grade dysplasia or cancers detected (odds ratio 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.83-1.04). Trainee endoscopists, number of biopsies taken, and male sex were all significantly associated with a higher yield for dysplastic lesions. The use of the high-definition endoscopy system is associated with better targeted detection of any dysplasia during routine Barrett's esophagus surveillance. However, high-definition endoscopy cannot replace random biopsies at present time.
© 2014 International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barrett's esophagus; dysplasia; endoscopy; high definition; surveillance

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25209721     DOI: 10.1111/dote.12283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  15 in total

Review 1.  Development of Quality Indicators for Endoscopic Eradication Therapies in Barrett's Esophagus: The TREAT-BE (Treatment With Resection and Endoscopic Ablation Techniques for Barrett's Esophagus) Consortium.

Authors:  Sachin Wani; V Raman Muthusamy; Nicholas J Shaheen; Rena Yadlapati; Robert Wilson; Julian A Abrams; Jacques Bergman; Amitabh Chak; Kenneth Chang; Ananya Das; John Dumot; Steven A Edmundowicz; Glenn Eisen; Gary W Falk; M Brian Fennerty; Lauren Gerson; Gregory G Ginsberg; David Grande; Matt Hall; Ben Harnke; John Inadomi; Janusz Jankowski; Charles J Lightdale; Jitin Makker; Robert D Odze; Oliver Pech; Richard E Sampliner; Stuart Spechler; George Triadafilopoulos; Michael B Wallace; Kenneth Wang; Irving Waxman; Srinadh Komanduri
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Evaluation of Dysplasia in Barrett Esophagus.

Authors:  Seth A Gross; Joseph Kingsbery; Janice Jang; Michelle Lee; Abraham Khan
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2018-04

Review 3.  Optimizing the diagnosis and therapy of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Juan A Muñoz-Largacha; Hiran C Fernando; Virginia R Litle
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Quality Indicators in Endoscopic Ablation for Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Samuel Han; Sachin Wani
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-06

Review 5.  Endoscopic imaging of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Mariam Naveed; Kerry B Dunbar
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-03-10

6.  Design and validation of a diffuse reflectance and spectroscopic microendoscope with poly(dimethylsioxane)-based phantoms.

Authors:  Gage J Greening; Amy J Powless; Joshua A Hutcheson; Sandra P Prieto; Aneeka A Majid; Timothy J Muldoon
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2015-03-09

Review 7.  Role of endoscopy in early oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Jayan Mannath; Krish Ragunath
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 8.  Best Practices in Surveillance for Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Joseph R Triggs; Gary W Falk
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2020-10-21

Review 9.  Evolving management of metaplasia and dysplasia in Barrett's epithelium.

Authors:  Richard P T Evans; Moustafa Mabrouk Mourad; Simon G Fisher; Simon R Bramhall
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Prevention Strategies for Esophageal Cancer-An Expert Review.

Authors:  Elisa Marabotto; Gaia Pellegatta; Afscin Djahandideh Sheijani; Sebastiano Ziola; Patrizia Zentilin; Maria Giulia De Marzo; Edoardo Giovanni Giannini; Matteo Ghisa; Brigida Barberio; Marco Scarpa; Imerio Angriman; Matteo Fassan; Vincenzo Savarino; Edoardo Savarino
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.