Literature DB >> 25209314

Study familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells.

Lu Han1, Yang Li1, Jason Tchao1, Aaron D Kaplan2, Bo Lin1, You Li1, Jocelyn Mich-Basso1, Agnieszka Lis2, Narmeen Hassan1, Barry London3, Glenna C L Bett4, Kimimasa Tobita1, Randall L Rasmusson2, Lei Yang5.   

Abstract

AIMS: Familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is one the most common heart disorders, with gene mutations in the cardiac sarcomere. Studying HCM with patient-specific induced pluripotent stem-cell (iPSC)-derived cardiomyocytes (CMs) would benefit the understanding of HCM mechanism, as well as the development of personalized therapeutic strategies. METHODS AND
RESULTS: To investigate the molecular mechanism underlying the abnormal CM functions in HCM, we derived iPSCs from an HCM patient with a single missense mutation (Arginine442Glycine) in the MYH7 gene. CMs were next enriched from HCM and healthy iPSCs, followed with whole transcriptome sequencing and pathway enrichment analysis. A widespread increase of genes responsible for 'Cell Proliferation' was observed in HCM iPSC-CMs when compared with control iPSC-CMs. Additionally, HCM iPSC-CMs exhibited disorganized sarcomeres and electrophysiological irregularities. Furthermore, disease phenotypes of HCM iPSC-CMs were attenuated with pharmaceutical treatments.
CONCLUSION: Overall, this study explored the possible patient-specific and mutation-specific disease mechanism of HCM, and demonstrates the potential of using HCM iPSC-CMs for future development of therapeutic strategies. Additionally, the whole methodology established in this study could be utilized to study mechanisms of other human-inherited heart diseases.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiomyocyte; Heart; Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; Induced pluripotent stem cells

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25209314      PMCID: PMC4217687          DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvu205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Res        ISSN: 0008-6363            Impact factor:   10.787


Introduction

Familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a primary disorder of cardiac muscle, and is associated with thickened ventricular wall and ventricular septum, increased myocardial fibrosis, disorganized myofibres, and always accompanied with arrhythmic heart beatings.[1] It is the most common autosomal dominant cardiovascular disease, with a prevalence of 1:500.[1] The overall annual mortality rate of HCM is 1–5%.[2,3] It is also the most common cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in young people, and accounts for one-third of all SCD in competitive athletes.[2] Mutations in over 11 genes, most of which encode sarcomeric proteins have been identified in HCM patients.[3] Mutations in β-myosin heavy chain (β-MHC or MYH7) account for ∼45% of all identified HCM cases.[3] Although medications and surgery can partially improve symptoms, no specific treatments to prevent or to arrest the development of HCM are available. At the cellular level, HCM is characterized by the enlarged cardiomyocytes (CMs) with increased protein synthesis, re-activated fetal cardiac gene expression, disrupted contractility, and electrical remodelling.[3,4] Many HCM mutations seem to induce abnormal heart contractility by perturbing Ca2+ cycling, CM force generation, and/or adenosine triphosphate (ATP) hydrolysis.[2] HCM-associated arrhythmias are caused by the electrical remodelling in the heart.[4,5] Despite the progresses in HCM study, a remarkable deficit still exists in the understanding of the molecular mechanism, which leads from sarcomeric mutations to the diverse HCM disease phenotypes. Currently, most mechanistic studies of HCM have been conducted in model systems, including transgenic and gene-targeted mice.[2] The difficulty to obtain heart tissues from healthy and HCM human hearts is the major obstacle for studying HCM using human cells. Recent advances in induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) circumvent this hurdle.[6] To date, single CMs have been derived from iPSCs of patients with Leopard Syndrome,[7] Long QT syndrome,[8,9] dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM),[10] and familial HCM[11] to model some aspects of disease phenotypes in vitro. However, the genome-wide study of disease mechanisms using CMs derived from patient-specific iPSCs remains unknown due to the difficulty of obtaining CMs from iPSC cultures with a high purity. In this study, we sought to establish a whole method for modelling heart disorders and studying mechanisms of inherited human heart diseases by using HCM patient-derived iPSCs as an example. Our HCM iPSCs carry a single missense mutation (R442G) in the MYH7 gene. As expected, HCM iPSC-derived CMs exhibited enlarged size, disorganized sarcomere structures and arrhythmic beatings. Using our established method,[12,13] CMs were obtained from HCM and control iPSCs with a high purity (∼90%), followed with whole transcriptome sequencing. A large number of genes responsible for ‘Cell Proliferation’ were increased in HCM iPSC-CMs compared with control iPSC-CMs. This revealed the possible molecular mechanism of HCM using patient-derived iPSCs. Additionally, HCM iPSC-CMs exhibited irregular Ca2+ handling and ion-channel functions. Furthermore, we found pharmaceutical reagents could prevent the developments of CM hypertrophy and electrical irregularities in HCM iPSC-CMs. Overall, this study established a new platform to study personalized mechanisms of inherited heart diseases by combining iPSC reprogramming, highly efficient CM generation, whole transcriptome sequencing, and electrophysiological analyses. It would benefit the future development of personalized therapies for human-inherited heart diseases.

Methods

Generation of HCM patient-specific iPSCs

Skin biopsy was collected from a 37-year-old female patient with diagnosed HCM through the IRB of B.L. at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC). This study was approved by University of Pittsburgh ethics review board and conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki. Patient consent was obtained for the use of fibroblasts. Dermal fibroblasts were reprogrammed to generate iPSCs by using retrovirus carrying SOX2, KLF4, OCT4, and c-MYC, respectively, as previously described.[6]

Animals

All animal studies conformed to the principles of the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH publication no. 85–23, revised 1996), and Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved all protocols. Non-obese diabetic/severe combined immune deficiency (NOD/SCID) mice were anaesthetized in a chamber with the introduction of 100% CO2 for 7–10 min. Euthanasia was accomplished by cervical dislocation.

Teratoma formation

It was conducted as a service in the transgenic core of Magee Women's Hospital, UPMC. 1×106 undifferentiated iPSCs were suspended in 10 μL Matrigel (BD Biosciences) and injected to the subrenal capsule of 8-week-old SCID/NOD mice. Eight weeks after cell delivery, tumours were explanted for haematoxylin and eosin staining.

Human iPSC culture and cardiac differentiation

Two healthy control iPSC lines were used here. The human S3-iPS4 has been previously generated[7] and the human Y1 iPSCs was established from healthy fibroblasts as previously described.[13] Both control iPSCs have been fully characterized.[7,13] The control and HCM iPSCs were maintained on MEFs with regular human embryonic stem-cell medium containing 10 ng/mL bFGF. iPSCs were differentiated into CMs using our previously established protocol.[12,13] The EBs were dissociated at around Day 24, seeded into 6-well plates and cultured as monolayers for additional 5 days. The drug treatments were performed with the CM monolayers. All growth factors were from R&D systems.

Whole-exome sequencing of patient-specific iPSCs

Genomic DNA was extracted from two clones of HCM iPSC clones for whole-exome sequencing. Details are available in the Supplementary material online.

Calcium imaging

The contractile CMs were incubated with media containing a Ca2+ indicator (Rhod-2 AM). Intracellular Ca2+ transients (CaiT) were optically recorded with a high spatiotemporal resolution CMOS camera as previously described.[13]

Whole transcriptome sequencing and data analysis

The whole transcriptomes of control S3-iPS4 and HCM iPSC-CMs C12 and C17 were sequenced and functional pathway enrichment was analysed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA). (http://www.ingenuity.com/products/pathways_ analysis. html).[14] See Supplementary material online for details.

Quantitative PCR analysis

Real-time quantitative PCR (q-PCR) was performed on a 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) with Fast SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). Results were analysed with EXCEL, normalized to Cyclophinin G (CYPG) gene expression. Primer sequences are described in Supplementary material online, .

Electrophysiological recordings

Cardiac action potentials and ionic currents were recorded from iPSC-derived single CMs. See Supplementary material online for details.

Microelectrode array recording

iPSC-derived beating EBs were dissociated and seeded onto multi-electrode chambers to form synchronized monolayers for recording field potential duration (FPD), beating frequency (beats per minute, BPM) and interspike intervals (ISI). Signals were acquired with a MED64 amplifier (Multi Channel Systems) and digitalized by MC_rack and MC_datatool.

Data analysis

Electrophysiological data were analysed using pClamp 9 (Axon Instruments). Data are shown as means ± SD of three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed with Student's unpaired t-test and ANOVA. Two-tailed P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

HCM iPSC reprogramming and genotyping

From the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, we obtained skin biopsy from a 37-year-old female with diagnosed cardiac hypertrophy. Fibroblasts were grown out from the skin sample, followed with retroviral infection of four reprogramming factors OCT4, SOX2, KLF4, and c-MYC.[6] Four iPSC clones were established (Figure ). Next we conducted whole genomic DNA deep-sequencing of HCM iPSCs to identify disease-causing gene variants using the SOLiD™ Sequencing System (Life Technologies). Our whole-exome data were analysed by filtering coding variants against dbSNP138, 1000Genomes, and NHLBI EVS Exome databases. Full list of novel coding variants (<0.8% MAF in databases mentioned) are provided (Supplementary material online, ). We noted that MYH7 C1324G was the only mutation present in genes known to cause HCM and this specific mutation has been previously identified to cause HCM in patients.[15] This C1324G mutation results in an Arginine to Glycine substitution at the amino acid position 442 (R442G) of MYH 7 protein and was confirmed using Sanger sequencing (Figure ). Pluripotency of HCM iPSCs was validated by immunostaining of OCT4, NANOG, TRA-1-60, and SSEA4, AP (AP) live staining (Figure ), q-PCR detection of NANOG, SOX2, OCT4 expressions in HCM iPSCs (Figure ), and the teratoma formation assay with in vivo generation of three germ layers (Figure ). A stable chromosomal integrity (46, XX) was revealed by karyotyping (Figure ). As previously described,[6] the diminishment of retroviral transgenes was detected in HCM iPSCs (Supplementary material online, ). Taken together, all these data reveal the successful generation of HCM patient-specific iPSCs. Establishment and characterization of HCM iPSCs. (A) Reprogramming of HCM dermal fibroblasts to iPSCs showing pluripotent stem cell morphology with positive AP staining and expression of pluripotency markers, OCT4, NANOG, TRA1-60, and SSEA4. Scale bars, 100 µm. (B) Sanger sequencing to confirm the R442G heterozygous missense mutation in the MYH7 gene from HCM patient-derived iPSCs. (C) Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of human ES cell line H1 and HCM iPSC clone12 and clone17 for detecting the expression of pluripotency marker genes OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG (n = 3). (D) Teratoma formation with HCM iPSCs showing three embryonic germ layers. Scale bar, 50 µm. (E) Karyotyping of HCM iPSCs.

CM differentiation and genome-wide transcriptional profiling

In this study, two healthy human iPSC lines S3-iPS4 and Y-1 were used as normal controls. Both of them were generated and fully characterized as previously described.[7,13] Both control and HCM iPSCs were differentiated into CMs using our established method[13] (Supplementary material online, ), which was modified from our previous cardiac differentiation protocol with human embryonic stem cells.[12] This protocol has been previously utilized for modelling Leopard Syndrome (LS)-associated HCM, DCM, and familial HCM with patient-derived iPSCs.[7,10,11] In this study, we screened multiple HCM iPSC clones and found two clones (HCM C12 and C17) could give rise to CMs with a high purity (Figure ). Thus CMs were obtained from HCM and control S3-iPS4 iPSCs, followed by whole transcriptome sequencing using an Ion Torrent Sequencer (Life Technologies). In order to minimize the possible differences from HCM iPSC clones, CMs generated from the two iPSC clones were utilized for sequencing. The CM gene expressions from two HCM iPSC clones were then averaged and compared with that from the control iPSCs. Approximately 15% (∼2000 genes) of all sequenced genes exhibited significant expression changes (>2-folds) in HCM iPSC-CMs vs. control iPSC-CMs (Figure ).[14] Next, we examined the biofunctional enrichment of differentially expressed genes by using IPA (Ingenuity Systems Pathway Analysis Software). Interestingly, the up-regulated genes in HCM CMs vs. control CMs were mostly associated with ‘Cell Proliferation and Movement’ biofunctional categories (Figure ). The sequencing results from CMs of two HCM iPSC clones were very consistent (Supplementary material online, ). This indicated that this group of genes, which regulate cell proliferation in HCM iPSC-CMs, might play an essential role in the developing of HCM. Therefore, we next utilized IPA to establish a functional gene connection network with all the up-regulated genes enriched in the IPA ‘Proliferation of cells’ category (Figure ) (Supplementary material online, ). Interestingly, several genes, including WNT1, CDH1, CXCR4, FGF8, and CCL2 were found to be central regulators in this network, implying their critical role during the developing of human HCM. Previous studies indicated that the canonical Wnt/β-Catenin pathway could regulate cell proliferation in the early stage of heart development.[16,17] Additionally, activation of non-canonical Wnt pathway stimulates calcium release within CMs and in turn triggers the Calcineurin-NFAT signalling pathway, which is essential for activating cardiac growth and remodelling genes during cardiac hypertrophy.[18] Consistent with this observation, we found an increased level of nuclear NFATC4 in HCM iPSC-CMs when compared with control iPSC-CMs via immunostaining (Figure  and C). Besides WNT signalling pathway, the expression levels of FGF8 and FGF receptor-FGFR4 were increased in HCM iPSC-CMs. FGF signalling has been previously shown to regulate myocytes proliferation,[19-21] as well as to induce hypertrophy of CMs.[22-24] Moreover, the critical roles of CDH1 and CXCR4 in cancer cell proliferation have been previously studied,[25,26] albeit unclear in cardiac hypertrophy. However, it has been reported that WNT signalling could interact with CDH1 and CXCR4 in urothelial cells and neural progenitors.[27,28] Figure  shows the relative levels of some differentially expressed genes in HCM vs. control CMs from the whole-transcriptional sequencing analysis, which include HCM-related genes EDN1, NFACT4, NPPA, and NPPB and fibrosis-related genes COL1A1 and COL9A2. This gene expression change pattern is highly consistent with previous HCM studies in other models[29] and was validated by q-PCR (Supplementary material online, ). Altogether, this analysis for the first time sought to explore the personalized molecular mechanism of human HCM using patient-derived iPSCs, indicating a cell-intrinsic mechanism to promote CM growth in this HCM patient. CM differentiation and gene expression profile of HCM iPSC-CMs. (A) The ratios of beating embryoid bodies (n = 4 for each line) at Day 22 of iPSC differentiation and ratios of CMs derived from day 22 EBs of control and HCM iPSCs. Cardiac Troponin T (CTNT) is a marker for CMs. (B) CMs derived from control S3-iPS4 and two clones of HCM iPSCs were used for whole transcriptome sequencing with an Ion Torrent Sequencer (Life Technologies). FPKMs from CMs of two HCM clones and control iPSCs (n = 3, each sample) were averaged and compared, which revealed both up-regulated and down-regulated genes in HCM iPSC-CMs (left panel). Ingenuity IPA bio-functional enrichment analysis was conducted with the up-regulated genes in HCM CMs, with the top enriched bio-functional categories shown in right panel. (C) The connection network of genes enriched in the Proliferation of Cells category. (D) Expression fold changes of HCM-related genes in HCM iPSC-CMs vs. control iPSC-CMs from Y1 and S3 iPSCs. Fold changes were represented as mean ± S.D in a log2 form. Phenotypic characterization of HCM iPSC-CMs. (A) Representative immunofluorescent images showing increased cell size and nuclear translocated NFATC4 in HCM iPSC-CMs. White frames indicated the multinucleation in HCM iPSC-CMs. Scale bars, 10 µm. (B) Quantification of CM size. n = 105. (C) Ratio of NFATC4 nuclear translocation in control and HCM iPSC-CMs. n = 169. (D) Representative immunostaining of CTNT and α-Actinin to show the sarcomere disorganization in HCM iPSC-CMs. Scale bars, 10 µm. (E) Ratio of sarcomere disorganization in control and HCM iPSC-CMs. n = 150. (F) Transmission Electron Microscopy images of myofibrillar organization in control and HCM iPSC-CMs. Scale bars, 500 nm. Z, Z band. Red arrows indicate the disorganized myofibrils. Error bars show SD. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. (Student's t-test).

Detecting sarcomere organization

At the cellular level, HCM is characterized by the enlarged CM size with disrupted contractility, implying the disorganized sarcomeres in HCM CMs.[1,2] First, CMs from control and HCM iPSCs were immunostained for a CM marker, Cardiac Troponin T (CTNT) (Figure ). Compared with the control, HCM iPSC-CMs exhibit a significantly larger surface area (Figure ) and an increased ratio of nuclear located NFATC4 (51.35 vs. 16.95%, n = 169) (Figure  and C). These results indicate a hypertrophic phenotype in HCM iPSC-CMs as previously described.[7] Next, Confocal microscopy detected an increased ratio of disrupted sarcomeres in HCM iPSC-CMs vs. control iPSC-CMs (42 vs.17%, n = 150) (Figure  and E). Lastly, using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), well-organized myofibrils with clearly defined Z bands were observed in the control iPSC-CMs, whereas the perturbed myofibrils with disorganized Z lines were found in the HCM iPSC-CMs (Figure , Supplementary material online, ). All these results demonstrate the disrupted sarcomere organizations in HCM iPSC-CMs, implying mechanical abnormalities in HCM myocardium.

Electrophysiological behaviour of single HCM iPSC-CMs

HCM is generally associated with susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmia, multiple electrophysiological abnormalities, and heart failure.[1,5,30] Therefore, we first examined action potentials of single CM ventricular-like properties using whole cell patch clamp. The intracellular recording revealed a marked increase in action potential duration (APD) prolongation (Figure  and Supplementary material online, ), and an increase in the degree of variability in HCM iPSC-CMs compared with control iPSC-CMs (CTL, n = 23; HCM, n = 41) (Figure ). The average APDs at 90% repolarization (APD90) and 50% repolarization (APD50) of spontaneous beating HCM iPSC-CMs were significantly longer than those of control iPSC-CMs (APD 90: 560.5 ± 81.3 vs. 910.4 ± 86.9 ms and APD50: 429.3 ± 84.1 vs. 756.4 ± 82.2 ms) (Figure ) and suggested a change in action potential shape to a less triangular shape in HCM iPSC-CMs vs. control iPSC-CMs (Figure ). Similar results were observed with the electrically stimulated, as opposed to spontaneously fired, HCM and control iPSC-CMs (Supplementary material online, ). Interestingly, the change of APDs was also accompanied by changes in action potentials shape. While many action potentials had the characteristic rounded shape of the control cells (Figure , CTL), there were 4 out of 25 CMs in the HCM group displaying an extremely exaggerated notch response (Figure , HCM left) in morphology, which was not seen in matched controls or human HCM iPSC-CMs from a recent report.[4,11] Electrophysiological analyses of HCM iPSC-CMs. (A) Representative action potential recordings from single control and HCM iPSC-CMs. (B) APD50 and APD90 distributions of spontaneously beating CMs. (CTL, n = 23; HCM, n = 41) (C) Quantification of APD50/90 of control and HCM iPSC-CMs. **P < 0.01. (D) Representative MEA extracellular recording from control and HCM iPSC-CMs. HCM iPSC-CMs exhibit elevated arrhythmogenicity. Red arrows indicate the premature beats. (E) Interspike interval (ISI) distribution in control and HCM iPSC-CMs. (F) Quantification of arrhythmogenic events in control and HCM iPSC-CMs. **P < 0.01. (n = 12) (Student's t-test). (G) Beating rhythm analysis of monolayer CMs using the RTCA system. Irregular beating pattern was observed from the HCM iPSC-CMs. (H) Quantification of beating rhythm irregularity during a period of 10 h. Data were collected for every 10 min (n = 10). Error bars show SD. **P < 0.01. (Student's t-test).

Electrophysiological behaviour of CM monolayers

Next, we sought to evaluate the electrophysiological properties from the multicellular level. Microelectrode array (MEA) was used to measure the field potentials of CM clusters (Supplementary material online, ).[9] The extracellular recording exhibited prolonged and dispersed interspike intervals (ISI) in HCM iPSC-CMs compared with control iPSC-CMs (Figure ). The recording of irregular potentials in HCM iPSC-CMs (Figure  and E, Supplementary material online, ) led to increased arrhythmogenic events (19% in HCM vs. 4% in control, Figure ). Lastly, an increased irregular contractility was detected from synchronized HCM iPSC-CM monolayers using the Real-Time Cell Analyzer (RTCA, Roche) (Figure  and H, Supplementary material online, ). All these indicate the electrophysiological abnormalities of HCM iPSC-CMs.

Calcium transient behaviour in HCM iPSC-CMs

Myocyte excitation–contraction coupling is stringently regulated, in part, through the modulation of calcium (Ca2+) influx release and removal sequestration.[31] Calcium influx through L-type calcium channels and calcium release from sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) contribute importantly to APD formation and have a key role in arrhythmia.[32] We analysed Ca2+ handling in HCM and control iPSC-CMs using optical mapping. Compared with control CMs, HCM CMs exhibited a significant irregularity of calcium transient (Figure  and B). The resting level of Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) was significantly elevated in HCM CMs compared with control CMs (21% increase, n = 51) (Figure  and D). In the heart, Ca2+ enters the myocytes through the voltage-gated L-type Ca2+ channels, which in turn triggers Ca2+-mediated Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) by the ryanodine receptor (RYR2). During diastole, Ca2+ reuptake into the SR is mediated by the SR Ca2+ -ATPase (SERCA). Therefore, we measured the SR Ca2+ storage with caffeine treatment, which induces the Ca2+ release from SR into cytoplasm. HCM CMs exhibited a lower Ca2+ transient increase after caffeine administration, indicating a depressed Ca2+ storage in the SR of HCM CMs (Figure  and F), which could be due to the decreased level of RYR2 (Supplementary material online, ). In addition, Ca2+ transient of HCM CMs exhibited a delayed decay time, indicating compromised diastole of HCM CMs (Figure , P = 2.05E-07), which could be caused by the decreased SERCA2A expression in HCM CMs (Figure ) as previously observed.[33,34] Furthermore, we measured the voltage- gated L-type Ca2+ current. The HCM CMs showed a pronounced increase of Ca2+ currents compared with control CMs (Figure , upper panel). Cav1.2, which is a major subunit of Ca2+ channel expressed in CMs,[35,36] showed an increased level in HCM CMs when compared with control CMs (Figure , lower panel). Additionally, increased sodium and outward potassium currents were observed in HCM CMs than in control CMs (Figure  and J, Supplementary material online, ). Taken together, HCM iPSC-CMs exhibited altered ion channel and SR functions, consistent with previous HCM studies in animal and human cells.[11,30] These findings suggest that the abnormal calcium handling of HCM iPSC-CMs due to the single MYH7 mutation could play an essential role in the pathogenesis of HCM. Analysis of calcium handling and ion channels. (A) Representative calcium transient optical mapping indicating irregular calcium transients in HCM iPSC-CMs (Red arrows). (B) Quantification of calcium irregularity in control and HCM iPSC-CMs (n = 30). (C) Representative calcium transient mapping showing elevated resting [Ca2+]i in HCM CMs. (D) Quantification of resting [Ca2+]i in control and HCM CMs (n = 51). (E) Representative image of calcium release in control and HCM CMs post caffeine (5 mM) treatment. (F) Quantification of relative Ca2+ storage in SR (n = 11 control, n = 9 HCM). (G) Quantification of calcium transient decay time in control and HCM CMs. (n = 48 control, n = 50 HCM, P = 2.05E-07). (H) Measurement of ICa followed depolarizing potentials of −130 to 50 mV in 10 mV increments (n = 6) and western blot of Cav1.2 in control and HCM CMs. (I) Measurement of Na+ current magnitudes followed depolarizing potentials of −130 to 50 mV in 10 mV increments (n = 31) and western blot of SCN5A in control and HCM CMs. (J) Measurement of outward K+ currents followed depolarizing potentials of −130 to 50 mV in 10 mV increments (n = 10) and western blot of Kv4.2 in control and HCM CMs. Current-to-Voltage (I–V) relationships were normalized with respect to cell capacitance. Error bars show SD. *P < 0.05. (Student's t-test).

Pharmaceutical treatment of HCM CMs

HCM patient iPSC-CMs provide an in vitro model to evaluate therapeutic benefits of pharmaceutical agents. Both control and HCM iPSC-CMs were treated with a β-adrenergic agonist, isoproterenol, which is known to trigger cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure in animals.[37,38] Administration of 1 μM isoproterenol (Iso) for 5 days increased the beating frequencies of control and HCM CMs (Figure ), and significantly elevated premature beats and irregular beating rates in HCM CMs (Figure , D and Supplementary material online, ). We next tested the response of HCM CMs to several drug reagents, which are currently in clinical use for HCM therapy. First, β1-adrenergic blocker metoprolol (Meto, 10 μM) was added into HCM CMs post-isoproterenol treatment. Metoprolol significantly decreased beating irregularity and reduced arrhythmia in HCM CMs (Figure , C and E). Because Ca2+ influx through L-type Ca2+ channel contributes importantly to arrhythmia induction,[31,39] we next applied a Ca2+ channel blocker, verapamil (100 nM), to HCM CMs post-metoprolol treatment. This continuous treatment with verapamil for additional 4 days completely eliminated irregular beats in HCM CMs (Figure , C and E). Verapamil treatment ameliorated calcium handling abnormalities and depressed beating rhythm irregularity in HCM CMs, probably through decreasing the resting Ca2+ level and shortening Ca2+ transient duration (Supplementary material online, ). In addition, long-term treatment of verapamil with high concentrations (>250 nM) could induce the cessation of spontaneous beating in iPSC-CMs (data not shown), indicating the feasibility of using human iPSC-CMs for drug safety testing. Lastly, we continuously treated HCM CMs with pinacidil (1 µM) post verapamil. Pinacidil is a KATP channel opener and clinically used as an antihypertensive drug. However, it induced irregular interspike intervals in the HCM CMs (Figure ). These results revealed a personalized response of HCM iPSC-CMs to drug reagents and indicate the significance of using patient-specific iPSC-CMs for developing personalized therapeutic strategies for human HCM. Pharmaceutical treatment of HCM iPSC-CMs. (A) Representative field potentials (MEA) of baseline and post-adrenergic agonist isopreterenol treatment from control and HCM iPSC-derived monolayer CMs. (B) Field potential trace of sequential drug treatments with isopreterenol, metoprolol, verapamil, and pinacidil in HCM iPSC-derived monolayer CMs by MEA. (C) Change of interspike interval of field potentials in HCM CMs after sequential drug treatments. (D) Quantification of arrhythmic events in control and HCM CMs after isopreterenol treatment (n = 5). (E) Quantification of arrhythmic events in HCM CMs with isopreterenol, metopronol, or verapamil treatment, respectively (n = 5) (ANOVA analysis). (F) Representative immunostaining images of HCM CMs without/with the treatment of 10 nM Trichostatin A (TSA) for 3 days. Scale bars, 20 µm. (G) Quantification of size change of HCM CM (n = 77). (H) Ratio of NFATC4 nuclear translocation in HCM CMs (n = 164). (I) Representative Ca2+ transient of HCM CMs with/without TSA (10 nM) treatment for 3 days. (J) Quantification of Ca2+ transient irregularity in HCM CMs (n = 30). (K) Quantification of resting Ca2+ in HCM CMs (n = 30). Error bars show SD. *P < 0.05. (Student's t-test). Previous studies indicated that inhibition of histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity could prevent the progress of cardiac hypertrophy in animal and cellular HCM models.[40-42] However, the mechanism of HDACs in suppressing cardiac hypertrophy remains unclear. In this study, we tested whether Trichostatin A (TSA), which is a pan-inhibitor of histone deacetylases, could prevent the development of disease phenotypes in HCM iPSC-CMs. Remarkably, continuous administration of TSA (10 nM) for 3 days significantly ameliorated various hypertrophic phenotypes of HCM CMs, including the decreased CM size (Figure  and G, n = 83, P < 0.05) and suppressed NFATC nuclear translocation (Figure  and H. 51.35 vs. 31.93%, n = 169, P < 0.05). TSA also suppressed calcium irregularity (20 vs. 10%, Figure  and J) by decreasing the resting [Ca2+]i (Figure ). Altogether, our results indicate that TSA could possibly prevent cellular hypertrophy through decreasing the cytosolic Ca2+ overload of the HCM iPSC-CMs, demonstrating the feasibility of using HCM iPSC-CMs for future evaluating and screening of therapeutic compounds.

Discussion

Human MYH7 gene contains 38 exons. Up to 45% of familial HCM individuals carry mutations in MYH7.[3] Over 1000 mutations have been identified to cause HCM and many are in the different functional domains of MYH7 protein, which may account for the phenotypic diversity in HCM patients. In addition, the same MYH7 mutation can result in a variable disease penetrance and phenotypic severity in patients. All these indicate that, beyond the MYH7 mutations, the patient-specific genetic backgrounds significantly contribute to the varying clinical symptoms. Currently, most mechanistic studies of HCM have been conducted in model systems, including transgenic and gene-targeted mice.[2] However, given the genetic heterogeneity of HCM patients, the limited HCM animal models could not represent the over 1000 mutations in HCM patients. Thus, the development of translational therapy of HCM, especially the personalized medicine, requires the uncovering of personalized disease mechanism as a first step. Recently, CMs have been derived from iPSCs of patients with various inherited heart diseases,[7,9-11] and were utilized to model some aspects of disease phenotypes. However, the progress of disease modelling with iPSCs requires more personalized approaches, such as the genome-wide study of patient-specific disease mechanism. In this study, by conducting whole transcriptome-sequencing with CMs enriched from HCM and control iPSCs, we for the first time explored the patient-specific and mutation-specific HCM disease mechanism using patient-derived iPSCs. Our whole-transcriptional analysis suggested the possible important roles of several signalling pathways in the development of CM hypertrophy. In particular, we found WNT1 could be a central regulator of cell proliferation in human HCM iPSC-CMs, implying that WNT1 could be a potential therapeutic target of human HCM. Additionally, increased expression levels of Notch signalling pathway genes, such as DLL1/4 and FGF pathway genes, such as FGF8/FGFR4, were observed in HCM iPSC-CMs, indicating that multiple signalling pathways have been involved in the developing of HCM. Our next study is to conduct a comprehensive analysis of all differentially expressed genes in HCM vs. control iPSC-CMs, with a specific focus on genes enriched into multiple signalling pathways and the interactions of those signalling pathways, which could provide deeper insights into the molecular mechanism of HCM. Additionally, previous genotype–phenotype correlation studies have shown significant variability in the phenotype expression of HCM among affected individuals with identical disease-causing mutations, which suggest the possible existence of modifier genes that determine the disease phenotypic severities in HCM patients.[43] However, functional modifier genes in HCM largely remain unclear. It is our expectation that the technologies developed in this report, such as whole transcriptome sequencing and phenotypic assessments, together with the existing knowledge from large-scale genome-wide studies of HCM, could uncover and validate functional modifier genes in individual HCM patient. Consistent with the previous report,[11] our HCM iPSC-CMs exhibited enlarged cellular size, disrupted sarcomere structures, and disorganized CM myofibrils, indicating the compromised contraction machinery in HCM iPSC-CMs. In addition, we observed an abnormal Ca2+ handling in our HCM iPSC-CMs (Arg442Gly), which is similar to previous observations from HCM iPSC-CMs with a different MYH7 mutation (Arg663His).[11] The administration of verapamil could suppress the arrhythmic beats in both studies, indicating the imbalance of Ca2+ homeostasis is the major cause of arrhythmogenic events in MYH7 mutation-caused HCM. HCM iPSC-CMs (Arg442Gly) of this study did not exhibit an increased ratio of delayed afterdepolarizations (DAD), which was found in the previous Arg663His HCM iPSC-CMs.[11] However, we observed elongated APDs and exaggerated notch response in APD morphology in our HCM iPSC-CMs (Arg442Gly). All these differences suggest the possible impact of patient-specific genetic background on the disease phenotypic diversity, or the mutations on the different functional domains of MYH7 protein could lead to the differing electrophysiological irregularities. This is consistent with the previous observations that mutations within the head vs. tail domain of MYH7 could cause different levels of severities of cardiac hypertrophy and incidences of SCD in HCM patients.[44,45] Our findings demonstrated a combined defect of L-type calcium influx and intracellular [Ca2+]i handling in HCM iPSC-CMs (Arg442Gly), which might be caused by elevated expression of calcium channel protein Cav1.2. The HCM iPSC-CMs also exhibited the reduced function of calcium induced calcium release (CICR) from SR, which is consistent with the decreased expressions of RYR2 and SERCA2 in HCM iPSC-CMs. In addition, HCM iPSC-CMs showed pronounced increases of sodium, and outward potassium transient currents. Dysfunction in ion-channel homeostasis is the major trigger of cardiac arrhythmias, which is a serious complication in most HCM patients.[4,46] Thus, a major therapeutic target in HCM is to limit the development of life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia. Current medical management of HCM-associated arrhythmia, such as using β-blocker and calcium blocker, has remained unchanged over the past decades. We tested the response of our HCM iPSC-CMs to those anti-arrhythmia pharmaceutical reagents, and found reduced arrhythmia post drug administration. In addition, administration of TSA in our HCM iPSC-CMs eliminated irregular beatings and decreased the intracellular [Ca2+]i. Taken together, our results highlight the potential of iPSC-based technology for the future screening of pharmaceutical drugs to suppress HCM-associated arrhythmia. Here we compared the disease phenotypes between HCM and two healthy control iPSC-CMs. Given the recent development of human genome-editing tools such as CRISPR,[47] it would be ideal as our next study to generate an isogenic control by correcting the MYH7 mutation in HCM iPSCs, which could be utilized to further confirm that abnormal CM phenotypes are caused by the specific MYH7 mutation. Some of our observations from HCM iPSC-CMs might not be exactly the same as previous HCM studies, which aimed to summarize common disease phenotypes from all clinical HCM patients. For example, a recent study from Coppini et al.[4] analysed the electrophysiological properties of CMs isolated from 26 HCM patients with/without genetic mutations. The prolonged action potentials with increased late sodium and calcium currents were observed in that report, which are similar as our observations in this study. Opposite to our study, decreased repolarizing K+ currents and no significant changes of Nav1.5 expressions were found from 10 of 26 HCM patients, which were claimed as representative phenotypic properties for all HCM patients in that report. However, due to the lack of genotyping information from those HCM patients, it is not clear whether such differences were due to the different patient backgrounds or varying HCM mutations. It is important to note that in the current report, we sought to examine the patient-specific and mutation-specific HCM disease phenotype and mechanism, whereas Coppini's paper sought to summarize common HCM phenotypes from a group of HCM patients with varying genetic backgrounds and mutations. Although some of our results look different, the difference lies in our different views from a single vs. a group of HCM patients.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at

Funding

This work is supported by the University of Pittsburgh start-up, NIH UL1 TR000005 (University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science Institute, the Vascular Medicine Institute, the Hemophilia Center of Western Pennsylvania, and the Institute for Transfusion Medicine), and AHA SDG Grant (#11SDG5580002) to L.Y.; NIH R21 HL094402 and COMMONWEALTH OF PA (4100061184) to K.T.; NIH T32-HL76124 to J.T.; AHA GIA and NIH HL062465 to R.L.R.; National Heart and Lung Institute, HL093631 to G.C.L.B. Funding to pay the Open Access publication charges for this article was provided by University of Pittsburgh Start-up to L.Y.
  47 in total

1.  Expression profiling reveals distinct sets of genes altered during induction and regression of cardiac hypertrophy.

Authors:  C J Friddle; T Koga; E M Rubin; J Bristow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Electrophysiological remodeling in hypertrophy and heart failure.

Authors:  G F Tomaselli; E Marbán
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 10.787

Review 3.  Structure and regulation of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels.

Authors:  W A Catterall
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 13.827

Review 4.  The molecular genetic basis for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  A J Marian; R Roberts
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.000

Review 5.  Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Barry J Maron
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-03-13       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Late sodium current inhibition reverses electromechanical dysfunction in human hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Raffaele Coppini; Cecilia Ferrantini; Lina Yao; Peidong Fan; Martina Del Lungo; Francesca Stillitano; Laura Sartiani; Benedetta Tosi; Silvia Suffredini; Chiara Tesi; Magdi Yacoub; Iacopo Olivotto; Luiz Belardinelli; Corrado Poggesi; Elisabetta Cerbai; Alessandro Mugelli
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Reduced myocardial sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+)-ATPase mRNA expression and biphasic force-frequency relations in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  F Somura; H Izawa; M Iwase; Y Takeichi; R Ishiki; T Nishizawa; A Noda; K Nagata; Y Yamada; M Yokota
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-08-07       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  The L-type calcium channel inhibitor diltiazem prevents cardiomyopathy in a mouse model.

Authors:  Christopher Semsarian; Imran Ahmad; Michael Giewat; Dimitrios Georgakopoulos; Joachim P Schmitt; Bradley K McConnell; Steven Reiken; Ulrike Mende; Andrew R Marks; David A Kass; Christine E Seidman; J G Seidman
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Regulation of proliferation of the fetal myocardium.

Authors:  M T Armstrong; D Y Lee; P B Armstrong
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.780

10.  SDF1alpha/CXCR4 signaling stimulates beta-catenin transcriptional activity in rat neural progenitors.

Authors:  Yongquan Luo; Jingli Cai; Haipeng Xue; Mark P Mattson; Mahendra S Rao
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 3.046

View more
  77 in total

Review 1.  Modelling sarcomeric cardiomyopathies with human cardiomyocytes derived from induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Lorenzo R Sewanan; Stuart G Campbell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Mechanism of automaticity in cardiomyocytes derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Jong J Kim; Lei Yang; Bo Lin; Xiaodong Zhu; Bin Sun; Aaron D Kaplan; Glenna C L Bett; Randall L Rasmusson; Barry London; Guy Salama
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 5.000

Review 3.  Untangling the Biology of Genetic Cardiomyopathies with Pluripotent Stem Cell Disease Models.

Authors:  Jan W Buikema; Sean M Wu
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  The Application of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells in Cardiac Disease Modeling and Drug Testing.

Authors:  Lingqun Ye; Xuan Ni; Zhen-Ao Zhao; Wei Lei; Shijun Hu
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 5.  Cardiac myosin-binding protein C (MYBPC3) in cardiac pathophysiology.

Authors:  Lucie Carrier; Giulia Mearini; Konstantina Stathopoulou; Friederike Cuello
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 3.688

Review 6.  New approaches to establish genetic causality.

Authors:  Elizabeth M McNally; Alfred L George
Journal:  Trends Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 6.677

7.  Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy-linked mutation in troponin T causes myofibrillar disarray and pro-arrhythmic action potential changes in human iPSC cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Lili Wang; Kyungsoo Kim; Shan Parikh; Adrian Gabriel Cadar; Kevin R Bersell; Huan He; Jose R Pinto; Dmytro O Kryshtal; Bjorn C Knollmann
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 5.000

8.  Deficient cMyBP-C protein expression during cardiomyocyte differentiation underlies human hypertrophic cardiomyopathy cellular phenotypes in disease specific human ES cell derived cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Andre Monteiro da Rocha; Guadalupe Guerrero-Serna; Adam Helms; Carly Luzod; Sergey Mironov; Mark Russell; José Jalife; Sharlene M Day; Gary D Smith; Todd J Herron
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 5.000

9.  Identification and Functional Characterization of a Novel CACNA1C-Mediated Cardiac Disorder Characterized by Prolonged QT Intervals With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, Congenital Heart Defects, and Sudden Cardiac Death.

Authors:  Nicole J Boczek; Dan Ye; Fang Jin; David J Tester; April Huseby; J Martijn Bos; Aaron J Johnson; Ronald Kanter; Michael J Ackerman
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-08-07

10.  Generation of electrophysiologically functional cardiomyocytes from mouse induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Hongran Wang; Yutao Xi; Yi Zheng; Xiaohong Wang; Austin J Cooney
Journal:  Stem Cell Res       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.