Literature DB >> 25209125

Genotoxicity analysis of cerium oxide micro and nanoparticles in Wistar rats after 28 days of repeated oral administration.

Monika Kumari1, Srinivas Indu Kumari2, Paramjit Grover3.   

Abstract

The applications of cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeO2 NPs; nanoceria) extend to polishing agents, diesel fuel additives and as a putative antioxidant in therapeutics. Therefore, understanding the long-term toxic effects of CeO2 NPs is of particular importance. This study investigated the 28 days of repeated toxicity of 30, 300 and 600 mg/kg body weight (bw)/day of nanoceria and CeO2 microparticles (MPs) in Wistar rats after oral exposure. Genotoxicity was analysed using comet, micronucleus (MN) and chromosomal aberration (CA) assays. The results demonstrated a significant increase in DNA damage in peripheral blood leukocytes and liver, MN and CA in bone marrow as well as MN in peripheral blood after exposure to CeO2 NPs at 300 and 600 mg/kg bw/day. Significant alterations were observed in alkaline phosphatase and lactate dehydrogenase activity in serum and reduced glutathione content in the liver, kidneys and brain at 300 and 600 mg/kg bw/day in a dose-dependent manner. Conversely, CeO2 MPs did not induce any significant toxicological changes. A much higher absorptivity and significant tissue distribution of CeO2 NPs was perceived in comparison to CeO2 MPs in a dose-dependent manner. A substantial fraction of CeO2 NPs was cleared by urine and faeces. Histopathological analysis revealed that CeO2 NPs caused alterations in liver, spleen and brain. Further, distinct difference in the data among genders was not obvious. In general, the results suggested that prolonged oral exposure to nanoceria has the potential to cause genetic damage, biochemical alterations and histological changes after retention in vital organs of rats at high concentrations.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25209125     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/geu038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  13 in total

Review 1.  Cerium oxide nanoparticles in neuroprotection and considerations for efficacy and safety.

Authors:  Beverly A Rzigalinski; Charles S Carfagna; Marion Ehrich
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2016-11-08

2.  Genotoxic effects of chromium oxide nanoparticles and microparticles in Wistar rats after 28 days of repeated oral exposure.

Authors:  Shailendra Pratap Singh; Srinivas Chinde; Sarika Srinivas Kalyan Kamal; M F Rahman; M Mahboob; Paramjit Grover
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Biodistribution, cardiac and neurobehavioral assessments, and neurotransmitter quantification in juvenile rats following oral administration of aluminum oxide nanoparticles.

Authors:  Ninell P Mortensen; Maria Moreno Caffaro; Purvi R Patel; Rodney W Snyder; Scott L Watson; Shyam Aravamudhan; Stephanie A Montgomery; Timothy Lefever; Susan J Sumner; Timothy R Fennell
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 3.628

4.  Anodically Grown Titania Nanotube Induced Cytotoxicity has Genotoxic Origins.

Authors:  M Sheikh Mohamed; Aida Torabi; Maggie Paulose; D Sakthi Kumar; Oomman K Varghese
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Cerium oxide and barium sulfate nanoparticle inhalation affects gene expression in alveolar epithelial cells type II.

Authors:  Daniela Schwotzer; Monika Niehof; Dirk Schaudien; Heiko Kock; Tanja Hansen; Clemens Dasenbrock; Otto Creutzenberg
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 10.435

6.  Effects from a 90-day inhalation toxicity study with cerium oxide and barium sulfate nanoparticles in rats.

Authors:  Daniela Schwotzer; Heinrich Ernst; Dirk Schaudien; Heiko Kock; Gerhard Pohlmann; Clemens Dasenbrock; Otto Creutzenberg
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 9.400

7.  Cerium dioxide nanoparticles exacerbate house dust mite induced type II airway inflammation.

Authors:  Kirsty Meldrum; Sarah B Robertson; Isabella Römer; Tim Marczylo; Lareb S N Dean; Andrew Rogers; Timothy W Gant; Rachel Smith; Terry D Tetley; Martin O Leonard
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 9.400

Review 8.  Synthesis and biomedical applications of nanoceria, a redox active nanoparticle.

Authors:  Neelam Thakur; Prasenjit Manna; Joydeep Das
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 10.435

9.  The potential ameliorative impacts of cerium oxide nanoparticles against fipronil-induced hepatic steatosis.

Authors:  Lamiaa Wasef; Yaser H A Elewa; Atef M K Nassar; Yasser S El-Sayed; Dalia Samak; Ahmed Noreldin; Norhan Elshony; Hamida Saleh; Shaimaa M A Hassan; Abdullah A Saati; Helal F Hetta; Gaber El-Saber Batiha; Masakazu Umezawa; Hazem M Shaheen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of nanoceria systemic distribution in rats suggests dose- and route-dependent biokinetics.

Authors:  Ulrika Carlander; Tshepo Paulsen Moto; Anteneh Assefa Desalegn; Robert A Yokel; Gunnar Johanson
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.