Timothy L Jackson1, Usha Chakravarthy2, Jason S Slakter3, Alyson Muldrew4, E Mark Shusterman5, Denis O'Shaughnessy5, Mark Arnoldussen5, Michael E Gertner6, Linda Danielson7, Darius M Moshfeghi8. 1. School of Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: t.jackson1@nhs.net. 2. Queen's University of Belfast, Consultant in Ophthalmology, The Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland. 3. Digital Angiography Reading Center, Great Neck, New York. 4. Centre for Vision and Vascular Science, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland. 5. Oraya Therapeutics, Inc, Newark, California. 6. Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California. 7. The International Drug Development Institute, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. 8. Byers Eye Institute, Horngren Family Vitreoretinal Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the safety and efficacy of low-voltage, external-beam, stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled, multicenter, clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 230 participants with neovascular AMD who received ≥ 3ranibizumab or bevacizumab injections within the preceding year and requiring treatment at enrollment. METHODS: Participants received 16 Gray, 24 Gray, or sham SRT. All arms received pro re nata (PRN) ranibizumab for 12 months, with PRN bevacizumab or ranibizumab thereafter. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean number of PRN injections; best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA); loss of <15 Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters; change in optical coherence tomography central subfield thickness; and change in angiographic total lesion area and choroidal neovascularization (CNV) area. RESULTS: At year 2, the 16 and 24 Gray arms received fewer PRN treatments compared with sham (mean 4.5, P = 0.008; mean 5.4, P = 0.09; and mean 6.6, respectively). Change in mean BCVA was -10.0, -7.5, and -6.7 letters for the 16 Gray, 24 Gray, and sham arms, respectively, with 46 (68%), 51 (75%), and 58 participants (79%), respectively, losing <15 letters. Mean central subfield thickness decreased by 67.0 μm, 55.4 μm, and 33.3 μm, respectively. Mean total active lesion area increased by 1.0, 4.2, and 2.7 mm(2), respectively. Mean CNV area decreased by 0.1 mm(2) in all groups. An independent reading center detected microvascular abnormalities in 6 control eyes and 29 SRT eyes, of which 18 were attributed to radiation; however, only 2 of these possibly affected vision. An exploratory subgroup analysis found that lesions with a greatest linear dimension ≤ 4 mm (the size of the treatment zone) and a macular volume greater than the median (7.4 mm(3)) were more responsive to SRT, with 3.9 PRN injections versus 7.1 in comparable sham-treated participants (P = 0.001) and mean BCVA 4.4 letters superior to sham (P = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of SRT significantly reduces intravitreal injections over 2 years. Radiation can induce microvascular change, but in only 1% of eyes does this possibly affect vision. The best response occurs when AMD lesions fit within the treatment zone and they are actively leaking.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To determine the safety and efficacy of low-voltage, external-beam, stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled, multicenter, clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 230 participants with neovascular AMD who received ≥ 3 ranibizumab or bevacizumab injections within the preceding year and requiring treatment at enrollment. METHODS:Participants received 16 Gray, 24 Gray, or sham SRT. All arms received pro re nata (PRN) ranibizumab for 12 months, with PRN bevacizumab or ranibizumab thereafter. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean number of PRN injections; best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA); loss of <15 Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters; change in optical coherence tomography central subfield thickness; and change in angiographic total lesion area and choroidal neovascularization (CNV) area. RESULTS: At year 2, the 16 and 24 Gray arms received fewer PRN treatments compared with sham (mean 4.5, P = 0.008; mean 5.4, P = 0.09; and mean 6.6, respectively). Change in mean BCVA was -10.0, -7.5, and -6.7 letters for the 16 Gray, 24 Gray, and sham arms, respectively, with 46 (68%), 51 (75%), and 58 participants (79%), respectively, losing <15 letters. Mean central subfield thickness decreased by 67.0 μm, 55.4 μm, and 33.3 μm, respectively. Mean total active lesion area increased by 1.0, 4.2, and 2.7 mm(2), respectively. Mean CNV area decreased by 0.1 mm(2) in all groups. An independent reading center detected microvascular abnormalities in 6 control eyes and 29 SRT eyes, of which 18 were attributed to radiation; however, only 2 of these possibly affected vision. An exploratory subgroup analysis found that lesions with a greatest linear dimension ≤ 4 mm (the size of the treatment zone) and a macular volume greater than the median (7.4 mm(3)) were more responsive to SRT, with 3.9 PRN injections versus 7.1 in comparable sham-treated participants (P = 0.001) and mean BCVA 4.4 letters superior to sham (P = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of SRT significantly reduces intravitreal injections over 2 years. Radiation can induce microvascular change, but in only 1% of eyes does this possibly affect vision. The best response occurs when AMD lesions fit within the treatment zone and they are actively leaking.
Authors: Timothy L Jackson; Cristina Soare; Caroline Petrarca; Andrew Simpson; James E Neffendorf; Robert Petrarca; Alyson Muldrew; Tunde Peto; Usha Chakravarthy; Luke Membrey; Richard Haynes; Mark Costen; David Steel; Riti Desai Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Carrie M Carr; John C Benson; David R DeLone; Felix E Diehn; Dong Kun Kim; Kenneth W Merrell; Alex A Nagelschneider; Ajay A Madhavan; Derek R Johnson Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2021-01-04 Impact factor: 2.804