PURPOSE: An acute reduction in blood pressure observed after a single bout of exercise is termed post-exercise hypotension (PEH). In contrast to moderate intensity aerobic exercise, little is known about the PEH response following high-intensity interval exercise. The present purpose is to assess how sex and training status impact PEH following high-intensity interval exercise. METHODS: Cardiac volumes and function via echocardiography were measured in 40 normotensive, endurance-trained (ET) and normally active (NA) men and women (Age ± SD = 30.5 ± 5.7) following high-intensity interval cycle exercise. Continuous measurements of ECG and beat-by-beat blood pressure were collected before and 30 min post-exercise for determination of cardiovagal baroreflex function (BRS and αLF), spectral analysis of heart rate and systolic blood pressure (SBP LF). RESULTS: Post-exercise systolic BP was significantly reduced from baseline, occurring to a greater degree in ET compared with NA (-12.9 vs. -5.3 mmHg, P = 0.008), while mean arterial pressure was similarly reduced in all groups (-4.6 mmHg, P = 0.003). Despite reduced SVI and TPRI, CI was increased post-exercise (P < 0.01). ET experienced a greater decrease in αLF (P = 0.037) and increase in SBP LF (P = 0.017) than NA. Lean body mass was a significant predictor of change in SBP LF (Std. β = 0.735, P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: These results characterize greater depressions in cardiovagal baroreflex function, and increased sympathetic activity, following vigorous exercise in endurance-trained individuals compared with normally active participants. This heightened sympathovagal balance after high-intensity exercise may be a compensatory mechanism in response to greater peripheral blood flow demands following vigorous exercise.
PURPOSE: An acute reduction in blood pressure observed after a single bout of exercise is termed post-exercise hypotension (PEH). In contrast to moderate intensity aerobic exercise, little is known about the PEH response following high-intensity interval exercise. The present purpose is to assess how sex and training status impact PEH following high-intensity interval exercise. METHODS: Cardiac volumes and function via echocardiography were measured in 40 normotensive, endurance-trained (ET) and normally active (NA) men and women (Age ± SD = 30.5 ± 5.7) following high-intensity interval cycle exercise. Continuous measurements of ECG and beat-by-beat blood pressure were collected before and 30 min post-exercise for determination of cardiovagal baroreflex function (BRS and αLF), spectral analysis of heart rate and systolic blood pressure (SBP LF). RESULTS: Post-exercise systolic BP was significantly reduced from baseline, occurring to a greater degree in ET compared with NA (-12.9 vs. -5.3 mmHg, P = 0.008), while mean arterial pressure was similarly reduced in all groups (-4.6 mmHg, P = 0.003). Despite reduced SVI and TPRI, CI was increased post-exercise (P < 0.01). ET experienced a greater decrease in αLF (P = 0.037) and increase in SBP LF (P = 0.017) than NA. Lean body mass was a significant predictor of change in SBP LF (Std. β = 0.735, P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: These results characterize greater depressions in cardiovagal baroreflex function, and increased sympathetic activity, following vigorous exercise in endurance-trained individuals compared with normally active participants. This heightened sympathovagal balance after high-intensity exercise may be a compensatory mechanism in response to greater peripheral blood flow demands following vigorous exercise.
Authors: John H Eisenach; Leah R Gullixson; Susan L Kost; Michael J Joyner; Stephen T Turner; Wayne T Nicholson Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2011-12-22
Authors: Nisha Charkoudian; John R Halliwill; Barbara J Morgan; John H Eisenach; Michael J Joyner Journal: J Physiol Date: 2003-10-15 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: José González-Alonso; Stefan P Mortensen; Tina D Jeppesen; Leena Ali; Horace Barker; Rasmus Damsgaard; Niels H Secher; Ellen A Dawson; Stéphane P Dufour Journal: J Physiol Date: 2008-03-13 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Joyce M Evans; L Christine Ribeiro; Fritz B Moore; Siqi Wang; Qingguang Zhang; Vladimir Kostas; Connor R Ferguson; Jorge Serrador; Michael Falvo; Michael B Stenger; Nandu Goswami; Jon C Rask; Jeffrey D Smith; Charles F Knapp Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2015-10-05 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Matthew J Graham; Samuel J E Lucas; Monique E Francois; Stasinos Stavrianeas; Evelyn B Parr; Kate N Thomas; James D Cotter Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Miriam C Wolters; Julia Schmetzer; Christine V Möser; Lisa Hahnefeld; Carlo Angioni; Dominique Thomas; Nerea Ferreirós; Gerd Geisslinger; Ellen Niederberger Journal: Cells Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 6.600