Treatment of (E)-1-(methoxymethylene)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene with styryl diazoacetates in the presence of catalytic amounts of the dirhodium complex Rh2(S-DOSP)4 provides a highly enantioenriched hexacyclic product with 10 new stereogenic centers. The transformation proceeds by a cascade sequence starting with a double cyclopropanation of a benzene ring, followed by a Cope rearrangement of a divinylcyclopropane and then an intramolecular Diels-Alder cycloaddition.
Treatment of (E)-1-(methoxymethylene)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene with styryl diazoacetates in the presence of catalytic amounts of the dirhodium complex Rh2(S-DOSP)4 provides a highly enantioenriched hexacyclic product with 10 new stereogenic centers. The transformation proceeds by a cascade sequence starting with a double cyclopropanation of a benzene ring, followed by a Cope rearrangement of a divinylcyclopropane and then an intramolecular Diels-Alder cycloaddition.
The rhodium(II)-catalyzed reaction
of diazo compounds generates highly reactive carbenoid intermediates
under very mild conditions. The energy released on formation of dinitrogen
can be harnessed to generate unstable, high energy products that are
often capable of initiating a cascade sequence of reactions.[1,2] We have developed a number of such cascade sequences from vinyl
diazoacetates, including the stereoselective synthesis of cycloheptadienes
via the tandem cyclopropanation/Cope rearrangement[3] and the combined C–H functionalization/Cope rearrangement/retro-Cope
rearrangement.[4] Recently, we also developed
an enantioselective six-step cascade sequence that provides cyclopentanes
containing four new stereogenic centers from the union of allylic
alcohols and vinyl diazoacetates.[5] In this
paper, we describe our discovery of a novel complexity-generating
cascade sequence involving a tandem double-aromatic cyclopropanation/Cope
rearrangement/Diels–Alder reaction, which generates highly
enantioenriched hexacyclic products with 10 new stereogenic centers
in a single transformation.During the course of a recent study
of the Rh(II)-catalyzed combined
C–H functionalization/Cope rearrangement (CHCR) of enol ethers,[6] our group synthesized the α-tetralone-derived
enol ethers 1a and 1b (Scheme 1). Treatment of the less hindered Z-enol
ether, 1a, with vinyl diazoacetate 2a and
1 mol % of the Rh2(S-DOSP)4 catalyst (5) under standard CHCR conditions, provides
enoate 3 in excellent yield with high levels of diastereo-
and enantioselectivity.[6] Owing to the results
of our previous studies of the CHCR of geo-isomeric enol ethers,[6] we had expected that the more hindered E-enol ether 1b would fail to undergo the CHCR
and suspected that this compound would undergo C–H insertion
at the electronically activated benzylic methylene site.[7] However, to our surprise, treatment of 1b with vinyl diazoacetate 2a under the same
reaction conditions provides the complex polycyclic product 4a in modest yield as a single diastereoisomer and 94% ee.
Scheme 1
Divergent Reactivity of Enol Ethers 1a and 1b–
Reaction
conditions: 1 equiv
of substrate (0.25 mmol), 1.2 equiv of 2a added dropwise
over 3 h, 1 mol % of Rh2(S-DOSP)4, hexanes, −25 °C.
Isolated yields reported.
Enantiomeric exccess determined by HPLC analysis after purification.
Divergent Reactivity of Enol Ethers 1a and 1b–
Reaction
conditions: 1 equiv
of substrate (0.25 mmol), 1.2 equiv of 2a added dropwise
over 3 h, 1 mol % of Rh2(S-DOSP)4, hexanes, −25 °C.Isolated yields reported.Enantiomeric exccess determined by HPLC analysis after purification.Notably, this transformation generates six new
bonds, four new
rings, and 10 new stereogenic centers (including two all-carbon quaternary
stereogenic centers) in a single transformation. Considering the remarkable
complexity generating nature of this transformation, we decided to
explore the scope and generality of the transformation. No evidence
for the formation of CHCR or C–H insertion products was observed.
As this transformation requires incorporation of two molecules of
vinyl diazoacetate 2a into the enol ether 1b, the yield of 4 is substantially improved by increasing
the equivalency of vinyl diazoacetate as well as by elevating the
reaction temperature and increasing the catalyst loading to 2 mol
%. In addition, improved yields were observed for faster addition
times of the vinyl diazoacetate to the reaction (addition over 15
min as opposed to 3 h) due to a reduction in the formation of undesired
pyrazole byproduct.[8] Under these improved
reaction conditions, polycyclic compound 4a is obtained
in 76% yield and 94% ee as a single diastereoisomer (Figure 1, entry 1). Having developed optimized reaction
conditions for the synthesis of 4a, we subsequently explored
the scope of this reaction with respect to the diazo coupling partner.
As shown in Figure 1, a variety of styryl diazoacetates
react effectively to provide the corresponding hexacyclic products
in good to excellent yield (52–94%) with uniformly high levels
of asymmetric induction (94–97% ee). However, higher yields are generally achieved for more electron-deficient
diazo substrates (82–94% yield, Figure 1, entries 6–8), which experience a slower rate of competitive
pyrazolization.
Figure 1
Scope of vinyl diazoacetates in polycyclic formation.
Reaction
conditions: 2.1 equiv of 2a added dropwise over 15 min
at 0 °C to 1b and 2 mol % Rh2(S-DOSP)4 in hexanes at 0 °C followed warming
to rt for 30 min and then heating under reflux for 2 h. Isolated yields
reported. Enantiomeric excess determined by HPLC analysis after purification.
Scope of vinyl diazoacetates in polycyclic formation.
Reaction
conditions: 2.1 equiv of 2a added dropwise over 15 min
at 0 °C to 1b and 2 mol % Rh2(S-DOSP)4 in hexanes at 0 °C followed warming
to rt for 30 min and then heating under reflux for 2 h. Isolated yields
reported. Enantiomeric excess determined by HPLC analysis after purification.The structure and absolute configuration
of this novel hexacylic
product were confirmed by X-ray crystallography of 4e (Figure 2). The complex polycyclic compound
features a cagelike architecture, the strained nature of which can
be observed in the central tetrasubstituted alkene, which is twisted
from planarity by approximately 18°. The absolute configuration
of the other polycyclic compounds (4) is assigned by
analogy.[9]
Figure 2
Crystal structure of 4e establishes
the relative and
absolute configuration of polycyclic products.
Crystal structure of 4e establishes
the relative and
absolute configuration of polycyclic products.We subsequently explored the arene substrate scope of this
transformation
(Scheme 2). We were interested in examining
the reactivity of the β-tetralone-derived enol ether 6 as it is electronically similar to 1b. We anticipated
that this compound would be a substrate for the double cyclopropanation/Cope
rearrangement, providing a product that would be unable to undergo
the final Diels–Alder reaction. However, this aryl substrate
undergoes a simple, but highly enantioselective, C–H insertion
at the activated benzylic methylene to provide diene 7.[10] Substitution of the aryl ring completely
blocks cyclopropanation of the arene. In the case of the 7-methoxytetralone-derived
enol ether, 8, C–H insertion occurs at the activated
benzylic position. Perhaps more surprisingly, compound 10 gave mixture of products and 11 failed to react under
these reaction conditions. To date, we have found the E-enol ether 1b to be a privileged substrate for the
formation of this hexacyclic product.
Scheme 2
Attempted Cascade
Reactions of Other Aryl Substrates
Our proposed mechanism for this cascade sequence is shown
in Scheme 3. An enantio- and diastereoselective
double cyclopropanation
of enol ether 1b would provide bis-cyclopropane 13. After the initial cyclopropanation to form cyclohexadiene 12, a second and more rapid cyclopropanation from the unhindered
face would provide 13. Thus, the absolute configuration
of the product is set during the first cyclopropanation step. The
stereoselective double cyclopropanation of aromatic rings by donor/acceptor
carbenoids has been observed previously.[11] A subsequent divinylcyclopropane rearrangement[3] of 13 would form tetracycle 14. The bis-cyclopropane 13 contains two divinylcyclopropanes.
We attribute the regioselectivity of the divinylcyclopropane rearrangement
to a steric interaction between the aryl group of the unreactive styrene
and the methoxy enol ether in the boat-like transition state I that would be required for this rearrangement. Finally,
a proximity-induced Diels–Alder reaction in 14 would yield the hexacyclic compound 4.[12]
Scheme 3
Proposed Mechanism of Polycyclic Compound Formation
The successful formation of 4 requires the initial
cyclopropanation to be highly site-, diastereo-, and enantioselective.
It is well-established that vinyl diazoacetates undergo highly diastereoselective
cyclopropanations, and Rh2(S-DOSP)4 is an exceptional chiral catalyst for these types of transformations.[8a,13] The site selectivity can be understood by considering the well-explored
transition-state models for asymmetric cyclopropanation of electron-rich
alkenes by Rh2(S-DOSP)4 (Scheme 4).[8a,13,14] The cyclopropanation is a concerted asynchronous process in which
there is buildup of positive charge on one of the alkenecarbons during
the cyclopropanation.[14] The rhodium carbenes
of donor/acceptor carbenes are sterically demanding and preferentially
initiate the cyclopropanation at the least substituted carbon of the
alkene.[14] As it is well-established that
cyclopropanation of a 1,4-disubstituted benzene ring does not occur,[7,11] we assume the site for greater initial bond formation during the
cyclopropanation would not be adjacent to a ring substituent. Four
possible orientations (II–V) would
fit this criterion, although only transition state II would avoid steric interference with the “wall” of
the catalyst and is electronically favored for delocalization of the
positive charge build up into the methoxy group. A reaction proceeding
through transition state II would generate 12, which on further reaction would generate 4 with the
observed absolute configuration.
Scheme 4
Stereochemical Analysis of the First
Cyclopropanation Step
In conclusion, we have discovered a novel and high complexity-generating
reaction of styryl diazoacetates and the α-tetralone-derived
enol ether 1b that features an enantioselective double-cyclopropanation/Cope
rearrangement/Diels–Alder cascade. The formation of polycyclic
compound 4 demonstrates the capacity of reactive Rh(II)carbenoid intermediates to form strained and high energy products.
Although this reaction has a broad scope with respect to the styryldiazo
component, the arene scope is extremely limited, only succeeding with
enol ether 1b. These studies demonstrate the subtle controlling
factors of the substrate on the chemoselectivity of donor/acceptor
rhodium carbene reactions.
Authors: Simon J Hedley; Dominic L Ventura; Paulina M Dominiak; Cara L Nygren; Huw M L Davies Journal: J Org Chem Date: 2006-07-07 Impact factor: 4.354