Rolf Symons1, Pier Giorgio Masci, Kaatje Goetschalckx, Kostas Doulaptsis, Stefan Janssens, Jan Bogaert. 1. From the Departments of Radiology (R.S., K.D., J.B.) and Cardiovascular Diseases (K.G., S.J.), Gasthuisberg University Hospital, Herestraat 49, Leuven BR 3000, Belgium; and Department of Cardiology, Fondazione CNR/Regione Toscana G. Monasterio, Pisa, Italy (P.G.M.).
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between myocardial infarction ( MI myocardial infarction ) severity at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and regional and global postinfarction left ventricular ( LV left ventricular ) remodeling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This HIPAA-compliant study was institutional review board approved. In 186 patients, reperfused ST segment elevation MI myocardial infarction (mean age ± standard deviation, 59 years ± 11) was prospectively studied the first week and 4 months after infarction. Microvascular obstruction ( MVO microvascular obstruction ) and intramyocardial hemorrhage ( IMH intramyocardial hemorrhage ) helped define three infarct severity groups: S0, no MVO microvascular obstruction or IMH intramyocardial hemorrhage (n = 68); S1, MVO microvascular obstruction , no IMH intramyocardial hemorrhage (n = 84); and S2, MVO microvascular obstruction and IMH intramyocardial hemorrhage (n = 34). RESULTS: were compared in 40 control patients (mean age, 58 years ± 10). One-way analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc Bonferroni correction was used. Follow-up analysis was performed with paired Student t test or Mann-Whitney U test. Results Infarct severity was positively related (P < .001) to peak of troponin I, inflammatory biomarkers, area at risk, and infarct volume and inversely related to myocardial salvage ratio, systolic wall thickening ( SWT systolic wall thickening ) in the infarct, and adjacent myocardium and LV left ventricular ejection fraction ( EF ejection fraction ). At follow-up, LV left ventricular EF ejection fraction significantly improved in S0 and S1 (S0: 53% ± 8 to 56% ± 8, P < .001; S1: 48% ± 8 to 52% ± 10, P = .006), while S2 adversely remodeled with increase in LV left ventricular end-diastolic (175 mL ± 35 to 201 mL ± 40) and end-systolic (100 mL ± 24 to 115 mL ± 29) volumes (P < .001). SWT systolic wall thickening recovery in the infarct (S0: 32% ± 21 to 42% ± 24, P < .001; S1: 19% ± 13 to 29% ± 19, P < .001; S2: 11% ± 9 to 15% ± 15, P = .22) and adjacent (S0: 41% ± 19 to 52% ± 21, P < .001; S1: 32% ± 11 to 38% ± 16, P = .002; S2: 24% ± 13 to 29% ± 14, P = .092) and remote (S0: 54% ± 18 to 62% ± 20, P = .002; S1: 53% ± 18 to 57% ± 20, P = .092; S2: 50% ± 35 to 53% ± 22, P = .75) myocardium was related to infarct severity. LV left ventricular wall thinning with LV left ventricular mass decrease occurred at follow-up (S0: 110 g ± 27 to 100 g ± 27, P < .001; S1: 115 g ± 24 to 109 g ± 26, P = .019; S2: 134 g ± 35 to 117 g ± 27, P = .043). CONCLUSION: MVO microvascular obstruction and IMH intramyocardial hemorrhage significantly affect postinfarct myocardial and LV left ventricular remodeling; hemorrhagic infarcts behave worse than nonhemorrhagic infarcts, with lack of functional recovery and adverse LV left ventricular remodeling extending to remote myocardium.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between myocardial infarction ( MI myocardial infarction ) severity at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and regional and global postinfarction left ventricular ( LV left ventricular ) remodeling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This HIPAA-compliant study was institutional review board approved. In 186 patients, reperfused ST segment elevation MI myocardial infarction (mean age ± standard deviation, 59 years ± 11) was prospectively studied the first week and 4 months after infarction. Microvascular obstruction ( MVO microvascular obstruction ) and intramyocardial hemorrhage ( IMH intramyocardial hemorrhage ) helped define three infarct severity groups: S0, no MVO microvascular obstruction or IMH intramyocardial hemorrhage (n = 68); S1, MVO microvascular obstruction , no IMH intramyocardial hemorrhage (n = 84); and S2, MVO microvascular obstruction and IMH intramyocardial hemorrhage (n = 34). RESULTS: were compared in 40 control patients (mean age, 58 years ± 10). One-way analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc Bonferroni correction was used. Follow-up analysis was performed with paired Student t test or Mann-Whitney U test. Results Infarct severity was positively related (P < .001) to peak of troponin I, inflammatory biomarkers, area at risk, and infarct volume and inversely related to myocardial salvage ratio, systolic wall thickening ( SWT systolic wall thickening ) in the infarct, and adjacent myocardium and LV left ventricular ejection fraction ( EF ejection fraction ). At follow-up, LV left ventricular EF ejection fraction significantly improved in S0 and S1 (S0: 53% ± 8 to 56% ± 8, P < .001; S1: 48% ± 8 to 52% ± 10, P = .006), while S2 adversely remodeled with increase in LV left ventricular end-diastolic (175 mL ± 35 to 201 mL ± 40) and end-systolic (100 mL ± 24 to 115 mL ± 29) volumes (P < .001). SWT systolic wall thickening recovery in the infarct (S0: 32% ± 21 to 42% ± 24, P < .001; S1: 19% ± 13 to 29% ± 19, P < .001; S2: 11% ± 9 to 15% ± 15, P = .22) and adjacent (S0: 41% ± 19 to 52% ± 21, P < .001; S1: 32% ± 11 to 38% ± 16, P = .002; S2: 24% ± 13 to 29% ± 14, P = .092) and remote (S0: 54% ± 18 to 62% ± 20, P = .002; S1: 53% ± 18 to 57% ± 20, P = .092; S2: 50% ± 35 to 53% ± 22, P = .75) myocardium was related to infarct severity. LV left ventricular wall thinning with LV left ventricular mass decrease occurred at follow-up (S0: 110 g ± 27 to 100 g ± 27, P < .001; S1: 115 g ± 24 to 109 g ± 26, P = .019; S2: 134 g ± 35 to 117 g ± 27, P = .043). CONCLUSION:MVO microvascular obstruction and IMH intramyocardial hemorrhage significantly affect postinfarct myocardial and LV left ventricular remodeling; hemorrhagic infarcts behave worse than nonhemorrhagic infarcts, with lack of functional recovery and adverse LV left ventricular remodeling extending to remote myocardium.
Authors: Amir Pourmorteza; Marcus Y Chen; Jesper van der Pals; Andrew E Arai; Elliot R McVeigh Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-12-26 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Tom Hendriks; Minke H T Hartman; Pieter J J Vlaar; Niek H J Prakken; Yldau M Y van der Ende; Chris P H Lexis; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Iwan C C van der Horst; Erik Lipsic; Robin Nijveldt; Pim van der Harst Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-04-07 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: David Carrick; Caroline Haig; Nadeem Ahmed; Margaret McEntegart; Mark C Petrie; Hany Eteiba; Stuart Hood; Stuart Watkins; M Mitchell Lindsay; Andrew Davie; Ahmed Mahrous; Ify Mordi; Samuli Rauhalammi; Naveed Sattar; Paul Welsh; Aleksandra Radjenovic; Ian Ford; Keith G Oldroyd; Colin Berry Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Renato Francesco Maria Scalise; Rosalba De Sarro; Alessandro Caracciolo; Rita Lauro; Francesco Squadrito; Scipione Carerj; Alessandra Bitto; Antonio Micari; Gianluca Di Bella; Francesco Costa; Natasha Irrera Journal: Med Sci (Basel) Date: 2021-03-01