Literature DB >> 25207466

Effect of infarct severity on regional and global left ventricular remodeling in patients with successfully reperfused ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Rolf Symons1, Pier Giorgio Masci, Kaatje Goetschalckx, Kostas Doulaptsis, Stefan Janssens, Jan Bogaert.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between myocardial infarction ( MI myocardial infarction ) severity at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and regional and global postinfarction left ventricular ( LV left ventricular ) remodeling.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This HIPAA-compliant study was institutional review board approved. In 186 patients, reperfused ST segment elevation MI myocardial infarction (mean age ± standard deviation, 59 years ± 11) was prospectively studied the first week and 4 months after infarction. Microvascular obstruction ( MVO microvascular obstruction ) and intramyocardial hemorrhage ( IMH intramyocardial hemorrhage ) helped define three infarct severity groups: S0, no MVO microvascular obstruction or IMH intramyocardial hemorrhage (n = 68); S1, MVO microvascular obstruction , no IMH intramyocardial hemorrhage (n = 84); and S2, MVO microvascular obstruction and IMH intramyocardial hemorrhage (n = 34).
RESULTS: were compared in 40 control patients (mean age, 58 years ± 10). One-way analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc Bonferroni correction was used. Follow-up analysis was performed with paired Student t test or Mann-Whitney U test. Results Infarct severity was positively related (P < .001) to peak of troponin I, inflammatory biomarkers, area at risk, and infarct volume and inversely related to myocardial salvage ratio, systolic wall thickening ( SWT systolic wall thickening ) in the infarct, and adjacent myocardium and LV left ventricular ejection fraction ( EF ejection fraction ). At follow-up, LV left ventricular EF ejection fraction significantly improved in S0 and S1 (S0: 53% ± 8 to 56% ± 8, P < .001; S1: 48% ± 8 to 52% ± 10, P = .006), while S2 adversely remodeled with increase in LV left ventricular end-diastolic (175 mL ± 35 to 201 mL ± 40) and end-systolic (100 mL ± 24 to 115 mL ± 29) volumes (P < .001). SWT systolic wall thickening recovery in the infarct (S0: 32% ± 21 to 42% ± 24, P < .001; S1: 19% ± 13 to 29% ± 19, P < .001; S2: 11% ± 9 to 15% ± 15, P = .22) and adjacent (S0: 41% ± 19 to 52% ± 21, P < .001; S1: 32% ± 11 to 38% ± 16, P = .002; S2: 24% ± 13 to 29% ± 14, P = .092) and remote (S0: 54% ± 18 to 62% ± 20, P = .002; S1: 53% ± 18 to 57% ± 20, P = .092; S2: 50% ± 35 to 53% ± 22, P = .75) myocardium was related to infarct severity. LV left ventricular wall thinning with LV left ventricular mass decrease occurred at follow-up (S0: 110 g ± 27 to 100 g ± 27, P < .001; S1: 115 g ± 24 to 109 g ± 26, P = .019; S2: 134 g ± 35 to 117 g ± 27, P = .043).
CONCLUSION: MVO microvascular obstruction and IMH intramyocardial hemorrhage significantly affect postinfarct myocardial and LV left ventricular remodeling; hemorrhagic infarcts behave worse than nonhemorrhagic infarcts, with lack of functional recovery and adverse LV left ventricular remodeling extending to remote myocardium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25207466     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14132746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  9 in total

1.  Cardiac magnetic resonance-tissue tracking for the early prediction of adverse left ventricular remodeling after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Min Jae Cha; Jeong Hyun Lee; Hye Na Jung; Yiseul Kim; Yeon Hyeon Choe; Sung Mok Kim
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Correlation of CT-based regional cardiac function (SQUEEZ) with myocardial strain calculated from tagged MRI: an experimental study.

Authors:  Amir Pourmorteza; Marcus Y Chen; Jesper van der Pals; Andrew E Arai; Elliot R McVeigh
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Predictors of left ventricular remodeling after ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Tom Hendriks; Minke H T Hartman; Pieter J J Vlaar; Niek H J Prakken; Yldau M Y van der Ende; Chris P H Lexis; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Iwan C C van der Horst; Erik Lipsic; Robin Nijveldt; Pim van der Harst
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Cardiac remodeling following reperfused acute myocardial infarction is linked to the concomitant evolution of vascular function as assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Olivier Huttin; Damien Mandry; Romain Eschalier; Lin Zhang; Emilien Micard; Freddy Odille; Marine Beaumont; Renaud Fay; Jacques Felblinger; Edoardo Camenzind; Faïez Zannad; Nicolas Girerd; Pierre Y Marie
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 5.364

5.  Radiomics of Non-Contrast-Enhanced T1 Mapping: Diagnostic and Predictive Performance for Myocardial Injury in Acute ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Quanmei Ma; Yue Ma; Tongtong Yu; Zhaoqing Sun; Yang Hou
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 6.  Role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Jan Bogaert; Ingo Eitel
Journal:  Glob Cardiol Sci Pract       Date:  2015-07-02

7.  Myocardial Hemorrhage After Acute Reperfused ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Relation to Microvascular Obstruction and Prognostic Significance.

Authors:  David Carrick; Caroline Haig; Nadeem Ahmed; Margaret McEntegart; Mark C Petrie; Hany Eteiba; Stuart Hood; Stuart Watkins; M Mitchell Lindsay; Andrew Davie; Ahmed Mahrous; Ify Mordi; Samuli Rauhalammi; Naveed Sattar; Paul Welsh; Aleksandra Radjenovic; Ian Ford; Keith G Oldroyd; Colin Berry
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.792

8.  Impact of Early ST-Segment Changes on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance-Verified Intramyocardial Haemorrhage and Microvascular Obstruction in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients.

Authors:  Song Ding; Zheng Li; Heng Ge; Zhi-Qing Qiao; Yi-Lin Chen; Ao-Lei Andong; Fan Yang; Ling-Cong Kong; Meng Jiang; Ben He; Jun Pu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 9.  Fibrosis after Myocardial Infarction: An Overview on Cellular Processes, Molecular Pathways, Clinical Evaluation and Prognostic Value.

Authors:  Renato Francesco Maria Scalise; Rosalba De Sarro; Alessandro Caracciolo; Rita Lauro; Francesco Squadrito; Scipione Carerj; Alessandra Bitto; Antonio Micari; Gianluca Di Bella; Francesco Costa; Natasha Irrera
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.