Larissa J Lee1, Paula Bu, Colleen Feltmate, Akila N Viswanathan. 1. *Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; †Harvard Medical School; and ‡Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes including disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for women with node-positive, high-grade adenocarcinoma of the uterus. METHODS: Database review identified 73 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIC 1/2 grade 3 endometrial cancer diagnosed from 1995 to 2009. Study inclusion required total abdominal hysterectomy/bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and negative chest imaging. Histologic subtypes were endometrioid (22, 30%), papillary serous (20, 27%), clear cell (9, 12%), mixed (21, 29%), and undifferentiated (1, 1%). Adjuvant treatment was chemotherapy with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in 55 patients (75%), EBRT alone in 14 (19%), chemotherapy in 2 (3%), and no adjuvant therapy in 2 (3%). RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 50 months, DFS/OS rates at 5 years were 44%/53%, respectively. Intraperitoneal relapse was more common in patients with positive cytology (30% vs 6%, P = 0.02) and nonendometrioid histology (16% vs 4%, P = 0.3). By histologic subtype, 5-year DFS/OS rates were 59%/82% for grade 3 endometrioid, 25%/30% for serous, 22%/17% for clear cell, and 50%/51% for mixed histology (P = 0.1/P < 0.001). The 5-year DFS/OS rates were 56%/68% for those who received both chemotherapy and EBRT. Among patients treated with adjuvant EBRT, pelvic control was 93%. CONCLUSIONS: For node-positive, high-grade endometrial cancer, patients with endometrioid and mixed histologic subtypes had better clinical outcomes than did those with serous and clear cell cancers. Distinct patterns of relapse were observed with a greater risk of intraperitoneal failure for nonendometrioid histologic subtypes. Future studies are needed to define the optimal chemotherapy regimen and radiation fields.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes including disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for women with node-positive, high-grade adenocarcinoma of the uterus. METHODS: Database review identified 73 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIC 1/2 grade 3 endometrial cancer diagnosed from 1995 to 2009. Study inclusion required total abdominal hysterectomy/bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and negative chest imaging. Histologic subtypes were endometrioid (22, 30%), papillary serous (20, 27%), clear cell (9, 12%), mixed (21, 29%), and undifferentiated (1, 1%). Adjuvant treatment was chemotherapy with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in 55 patients (75%), EBRT alone in 14 (19%), chemotherapy in 2 (3%), and no adjuvant therapy in 2 (3%). RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 50 months, DFS/OS rates at 5 years were 44%/53%, respectively. Intraperitoneal relapse was more common in patients with positive cytology (30% vs 6%, P = 0.02) and nonendometrioid histology (16% vs 4%, P = 0.3). By histologic subtype, 5-year DFS/OS rates were 59%/82% for grade 3 endometrioid, 25%/30% for serous, 22%/17% for clear cell, and 50%/51% for mixed histology (P = 0.1/P < 0.001). The 5-year DFS/OS rates were 56%/68% for those who received both chemotherapy and EBRT. Among patients treated with adjuvant EBRT, pelvic control was 93%. CONCLUSIONS: For node-positive, high-grade endometrial cancer, patients with endometrioid and mixed histologic subtypes had better clinical outcomes than did those with serous and clear cell cancers. Distinct patterns of relapse were observed with a greater risk of intraperitoneal failure for nonendometrioid histologic subtypes. Future studies are needed to define the optimal chemotherapy regimen and radiation fields.
Authors: Laura L Holman; Navdeep Pal; David A Iglesias; Pamela T Soliman; Nyla Balakrishnan; Ann Klopp; Russell R Broaddus; Nicole D Fleming; Mark F Munsell; Karen H Lu; Shannon N Westin Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2017-04-30 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Nicole Concin; Carien L Creutzberg; Ignace Vergote; David Cibula; Mansoor Raza Mirza; Simone Marnitz; Jonathan A Ledermann; Tjalling Bosse; Cyrus Chargari; Anna Fagotti; Christina Fotopoulou; Antonio González-Martín; Sigurd F Lax; Domenica Lorusso; Christian Marth; Philippe Morice; Remi A Nout; Dearbhaile E O'Donnell; Denis Querleu; Maria Rosaria Raspollini; Jalid Sehouli; Alina E Sturdza; Alexandra Taylor; Anneke M Westermann; Pauline Wimberger; Nicoletta Colombo; François Planchamp; Xavier Matias-Guiu Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2021-02 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Nick M Spirtos; Danielle Enserro; Howard D Homesley; Susan K Gibbons; David Cella; Robert T Morris; Koen DeGeest; Roger B Lee; David S Miller Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2019-04-30 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Yi-Jou Tai; Heng-Cheng Hsu; Ying-Cheng Chiang; Yu-Li Chen; Chi-An Chen; Wen-Fang Cheng Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-07-18 Impact factor: 3.390